In much of the literature, corporate social responsibility (CSR) does not have a clear working definition. Therefore, this paper will address many aspects of CSR. For instance, Gee and Norton (2013) conducted a study pertaining to the responsibility and implications of CSR. The primary conclusion of this study explained societies and stakeholders are dependent on organizational leaders to produce wealth through their organizations. Moreover, the findings from this study indicated that stakeholders view corporations and its role in society responsible and accountable for its actions. Therefore, CSR is an imperative interaction between leaders, organizations, society, and stakeholders.
The interaction of CSR enhances financial, social, and environmental
…show more content…
Bogart (2014) research focused on organizational theory, corporate governance, corporate social responsibility, and leadership influence. Bogart (2014) postulated that the board of directors fundamentally influenced CSR efforts in the U.S. organizations and corporate social responsible leaders. This study also encouraged organizations to implement innovative approaches in leadership and corporate social responsibility to realize company and stakeholder value. This article also provides the framework and expectations for organizations to benefit society (Bogart, …show more content…
The judges considered the following characteristics: creativity, innovation, sound planning, implementation, and outcomes (PR, 2013). Moreover, MGM Resorts considers CSR as “diversity philanthropy and community engagement, and environmental sustainability” (PR,
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is the way a corporation achieves a balance between its economic, social, and environmental responsibilities in its operations so as to address shareholder and other stakeholder expectations. In general, when firms hold this wider encouraging role on the public by being engaged with stakeholders, a variety of profit can be produced for both company and the stakeholders. A key inclination is the combination of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) into the organization strategy, culture, mission and communications. By incorporating corporate citizenship into the company it is no longer an additional “nice thing to do” or something made to obey laws or regulations. Instead, corporate responsibility has become something business leaders and workforce want to engage in, frequently because executives who believe in the long-term see business profit. The four types of social responsibilities a...
It demonstrates that there can be no universal approach that would suit all relatively similar organizations. First of all, management always has to consider mentality, values, and norms existing in their local community, while also keeping in mind the attitudes existing in other communities and in the global market. At the same time, internal interests are no less significant in this matter, which is why great sensitivity is needed in the process of CSR creation and establishment. Thus, this article addresses both internal and external aspects of CSR as the parts of inseparable whole. It does not have independent and divided sections for each part as they are discussed in connection to one another, which is a realistic representation of an organizational decision-making process. In this way, the authors provide a practically applicable guideline that may be used to determine the most suitable CSR initiative, the methods of communicating this initiative to stakeholders, the resources that can and should be used, and the ways to involve stakeholders in the process of implementation as active participants rather than mere
Corporate social responsibility is globally defined as operating a business in a way that meets or exceeds the ethical, legal, commercial and public expectations that society has of business. The concern of CSR has drastically increased over the last two decades. It has enhanced interactions between governments, businesses, society and internationally. In the past, businesses primarily focus themselves with the economic results of their decisions. Now, businesses must also reflect on the legal, ethical, moral and social consequences of their decisions. Corporate Social Responsibility is no longer defined by how much money a company contributes to charity, but by its overall involvement in activities that improve the quality of people’s lives.
“Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is the continuing commitment by business to behave ethically and contribute to economic development while improving the quality of life of the workforce and their families as well as of the local community and society at large” (Holme and Watts (2000) p.8). For many years business have cared solely on money however in recent years businesses have started to take interest in CSR and helping society welfare. This paper will discuss if Corporate Social Responsibility is likely to become a game changer in the near future.
An organization’s Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) drives them to look out for the different interests of society. Most business corporations undertake responsibility for the impact of their organizational pursuits and various activities on their customers, employees, shareholders, communities and the environment. With the high volume of general competition between different companies and organizations in varied fields, CSR has become a morally imperative commitment, more than one enforced by the law. Most organizations in the modern world willingly try to improve the general well-being of not only their employees, but also their families and the society as a whole.
Enterprises lay high emphasis on corporate social responsibility instead of being profitable tools. It is essential for all the enterprises to focus on corporate social responsibility which can help the organization creates long-term sustainability for corporate success. More specifically, corporate social responsibility can be referred as a process which is aim to embrace responsibility for the organization’s actions. Moreover, it can have a benefit to the people who are regarded as stakeholders, like employees, consumers and communities, which is based on its activities. Also, Tai (2014) states that corporate social responsibility is considered as corporate citizenship which tends to be an obligation that can protect, foster, and enhance
Business organizations regularly run into demands from various stakeholders groups when conducting day-to-day business. These demands are generated from employees, customers, suppliers, community groups, governments, and shareholders. Thus, according to Goodpaster, any person or group of people that can shape or can be shaped by attainment of the objectives by an organization is considered a stakeholder. Most business organizations recognize and understand their responsibilities to these groups and endeavor to honor and fulfill them. These responsibilities are often communicated to the public by a statement of principles or beliefs. For many business organizations, corporate social responsibility (CSR) has become an essential and integral part of their business. Thus, this paper discusses the two CSR views: the classical view and the stakeholder view. Furthermore, I believe that the stakeholder view has brought ethical concerns to the forefront of businesses, and an argument shall be made that businesses would improve both socially and economically if CSR, guided by God’s love, was integrated into their strategic planning.
Burke and Logsdon (1996) focus on strategic CSR by outlining five dimensions: centrality, specificity, proactivity, voluntarism and visibility. They define centrality by measuring how close a firm’s CSR fits with its mission. They propose this measurement can supply both feedback and direction for the company’s future. A firm’s specificity measures the ability of the firm to absorb the benefit...
What is CSR? CSR or Corporate Social Responsibility indicates the actions or conducts that have strategic importance to companies. CSR has been defined as a company’s efforts or obligations in reducing and getting rid of any detrimental effects on the community and maximizing long-term beneficial effects to the company and community in which it operates (Mohr et al, 2001, cited Trendafilova et al, 2013). CSR usually starts with the general emphasis that businesses are not only responsible to generate economic returns for shareholders, but are also responsible to the environment and to other stakeholders. This is usually known as the “triple bottom line” – the company’s returns for investors, the environment and stakeholders (Markley, 2014). In today’s modern business environment, CSR is undoubtedly important because whenever possible, customers would like to purchase goods from companies they trust; suppliers want to develop business partnerships with companies they can entrust; employees want to work for companies they have a high regard for and NGO’s want to work with companies seeking possible solutions in areas of common concern. Pleasing each of these stakeholder groups enable companies to maximize their obligations to their shareholders who gain most when the needs of other stakeholder groups are met (Waldman et al, 2010).
In recent years, companies are becoming socially responsible and now stakeholders almost expect a company to have CSR policies. Therefore, in twentieth century, corporate social responsibility (CSR) became an important development in public life (Barnett, ND).Corporate social responsibility is defined as “the ways in which an organisation exceeds the minimum obligations to stakeholders specified through regulation and corporate governance” (Johnson, Schools and Whittington, N.D cited in March, 2012). Stakeholders can be defined as “those individuals or groups who depend on the organisation to fulfil their own goals and on whom, in turn, the organisation depends” (Johnson, Schools and Whittington, N.D cited in March, 2012). There are many purposes for this essay, the first purpose is to descried the key principles of corporate social responsibility and explain their importance for stakeholders. Secondly, is to show how far this company follows those principles in order to be accountable to at least three of its stakeholders. In this essay, three stakeholders, environment, customers and employees will be evaluated respectively and the key principles of the stakeholders will be examined.
A corporations CSR should be shaped in order to fit the goals of the corporation, although every corporation’s CSR should differ, since most have different goals and different communities behind them. The CSR should be molded into fitting the corporation’s goals in order to make it easier on the corporation in giving back to the community while achieving its goals. For example, a corporation located in a desert wishes to be more efficient, by reducing water usage it is not only creating lower costs, which result in higher revenue, but also helps the community by not taking up so much water. Taking this into consideration, it is critical that the corporation goals and values are established and clear throughout the corporation, they should be developed by the board or directors and CEO, and the highest managerial level should stress their importance to the rest of the corporation. By making the goals and values at the top branch of the corporate hierarchy, it will be simpler for the corporates community to develop in order to nurture those goals and values. Therefore, a corporation can reach the “shared-value,” a value for both its shareholders and community in a simpler manner that can result benefiting the corporation in the end as well. Throughout the article many examples are given of actual corporations that have benefited and changed their CSR in order to fit their goals, therefore, providing solid proof that these methods work. Nevertheless, as acknowledged by the author’s themselves, most of the corporations taken into consideration where one’s that Harvard CSR students were employed
Corporate leadership has changed, thanks to organizations such as Enron. Leaders and organizations must be social responsible, in order to succeed in the 21st century business environment. According to Peloza and Shang (2011), corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities create stronger relationships between firms and stakeholders. C.S.R. can improve the image of an organization and its leader. Leaders understand
CSR is the carrier of many names such as “citizenship”, “social performance”, “corporate conscience” or “sustainable responsible business” (Fontaine, 2013).
Now-a-days it is considered that CSR is one of the major concerns of organization’s business ethics. Companies increasingly increase their corporate social responsibility (CSR) and ethical management accepting the positive impact on the bottom line. The vast bulk of Standard & Poor’s 500 companies publish sustainability reports unfolding their program challenges and achievements. These pre-emptive efforts can pr...
In the current time of growth and progression, individuals should know that how a business not only flourish but sustain itself. Making profit is one of the main targets of every corporates but it must not be the only one. When an individual builds a company in order to do business, they should be well aware of their contribution towards the society as well as their business and employees in it. It is total strategy of all. We should be able to realize every increment contributes of it. One of the major factors that affect a business is how well it participates in Corporate Social Responsibility. According to (Werther & Chandler, 2006) corporate social responsibility (CSR) refers to a business practice that involves participating in initiatives that benefits the society. In authenticity, there is a whole lot to argue about it. There are no major guidelines that decides either a business is participating in Corporate Social Responsibility; what might be considered a Business practicing CSR to some, can still not be accepted for it by others. CSR may be restrained a term which his highly flexible. This paper will discuss about Corporate Social Responsibility and its