Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact Of Social Media In Modern Society
Impact Of Social Media In Modern Society
The influence of social media in modern life
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact Of Social Media In Modern Society
In today’s society, social media is a huge part of the average American’s life. This is especially true for the younger generation. From Facebook to Twitter to Instagram to YouTube, there are many online platforms the general public can log on to. Not only can people interact with friends and family online, but they can also check up on celebrities. Among these celebrities are this year’s presidential candidates and important political leaders. For example, Bernie Sanders. Even the president, Barack Obama, can be found online. Online access also allows people to post about the candidates and express their political opinions. It gives them a chance to discuss with others that may share or disagree with their political opinions. Citizens can …show more content…
The presidential campaign helps to inform citizens of the ideas and motives of the candidate. Online websites help to spread their ideas and beliefs to more of the population. Furthermore, not every person has access to watch political debates and interviews on a television. Web pages like Facebook and YouTube, give people a chance to view these programs on a mobile phone, tablet, or computer. This gives people on-the-go an opportunity to follow the news. America is a particularly fast paced, busy nation. For instance, someone can watch an interview on Facebook while taking a train to work. This convenience helps to involve busier citizens with politics. Social media also is an excellent way for presidential candidates to interact with followers. A website like Twitter gives candidates the chance to share events they may be having. This promotes their events and encourages extra people to become involved. Indubitably, there is a multitude of positive points between social media and …show more content…
Just about anyone has the ability to post online. This allows people to spread false information. This is notably common on Twitter. A person will post a false statement or a picture of a fake article to circulate lies. People will retweet to help extend these fabricated allegations without verifying if it is actually true. Online news pages will sometimes diffuse these accusations by releasing an article of the actual truth. However, not every erroneous rumor is proved incorrect. This can sway people’s political opinions based on the fraudulent material. Another issue with social media and the presidential election is that it can cause conflict between fellow citizens. People have the ability to post their political beliefs online as stated in the previous paragraph. This can cause conflict between people who support different candidates. For instance, someone who supports Hillary Clinton may attack a Donald Trump supporter by pointing out that they believe Donald trump is a racist, a sexist, and endorses white supremacy. Likewise, a Donald Trump supporter may criticize a Hillary Clinton supporter for standing behind who they believe is a liar. This causes tension between citizens and creates plenty of problems. Lastly, this year’s presidential candidates are eminently sophomoric over social media. For one thing, both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump
The purpose of this article is to persuade the reader that social media is the new alternative to mainstream big money ads for politicians. Cary’s intended audience is politicians, political campaign managers and politically engaged citizens. The tone of this article is informative but slightly opinionated. While Cary does back up her claims with notable quotes and statistics the main support for her argument is her professional opinion. Cary was formerly the
A great example of social media being used for politics is with the recent presidential campaigns. Social media began being used in presidential campaigns by President Barack Obama. Obama’s campaign in 2008 was considered the “Facebook election” since he used the social media platform Facebook to connect with the public. Now, mostly all presidential candidates use at least one social media
In the current time, it seems like one cannot go a day without using at least one social media website. This might be especially true among groups of teenagers and young adults. Social media became a vital part of daily life that feeds people with several types of information constantly. Political news is a type of information that can reach the people through the means of social media. Since presidents are constantly seeking new strategies to increase their communication with the public in order to spread their political message, they utilize the different social media websites. Hence, social media became a platform to spread political message. It is not surprising that now the majority of political officials and candidates have social media accounts more than ever before, such as a Twitter account.
Though many have accepted what the outcome has been, there are a few people, like ourselves, who wanted to breakdown these social media statistics and research why many other candidates were not represented enough nor being advertised in our newsfeed except for the candidates we “favored.” And while most might become bias when it comes to social media and how it is involved in politics and presidential campaigns, Facebook has become the most highlighted website for audiences to keep up to date with candidates and their involvement as well as the leading website for false clickbait news. This literature review will uncover the truth behind seeing such advertisements on our Facebook pages and why we see what they want us to see and not what we
The need to embrace, understand and utilize social media has come from the top down, literally. President Obama won the election largely due to money raised from grassroots donations and by reaching people through social media. Additionally, the President signed the “Open Government Directive” which makes transparency in government a requirement on all levels. This directive has a handful of unprecedented benefits. For the first time ever, all federal agencies were required to have two way communication with citizens. Additionally, citizens could make suggestions, vote up or down others’ ideas, and have an active voice in government through Twitter or replying to blog posts which was previously seen as near impossible.
Social media provides rich opportunities for youth to get engaged in civic participation by providing space for public debate and political discussions. Skoric (2015) points out that “… scholars have focused on new media forms as a locus for areas of civic and political participation” (p. 187). As reported by Lin, Cheong, Kim and Jung (2010), there is a positive association between the social media use and civic participation. For instance, social media platforms provide a huge amount of political information, from news on politics to political campaigns (Skoric, 2015). With today’s widespread use of social media platforms, heavy social media users, especially youth, are actively exposed to political information. Zhang (2013) argues that “… [Youth] was far more actively involved in online politics” (p. 257). Therefore, it will be beneficial for Singapore People’s Party to capitalize on this trend so as to create possibilities and awareness for greater youth
Specifically, American presidential candidates’ actions on social media like Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Myspace, has evolved over time in order to have direct contact with potential voters. Despite being…, the 2004 presidential campaign is the commencement of digital media and some forms of social media (). However, because of the text-based nature of the Internet, the lack of videos and images was not conducive to reaching a wide audience or attracting potential supporters. The subsequent presidential campaign of 2008 truly established the foundation for personal and immediate communication between candidates and the people through social media, including the use of images, infographics, and videos. In fact, during the 2008 presidential campaign, “16 of the 19 candidates linked on their campaign websites to an official Myspace account” (Pew Research Center 2016, 34), the most popular form of social media at the time.
Through social media, back and fourth connections are made possible. Politicians are brought down from being giant unreachable celebrities, to everyday people with a Twitter profile. Individuals no longer have to wait for the next political debate or a rally to take in
After reading this article I came to the conclusion that yes, social media does play a big part in political campaigns and it is not just superficial topics. Social media can completely change how a person sees a candidate just by a 140 character tweet. The way this happens is through repetition of seeing the same tweet or vine over and over again. This can either create a hate or love for that specific person. Before social media there was only newspapers and the news to receive information. Because of this there was not horribly petty jokes that are about Donald Trump’s hair engraved into your brain everyday over and over
According to President Barack Obama in his 2011 State of the Union Speech, “In a single generation, revolutions in technology have transformed the way we live, work and do business.” (Obama 2011) President Obama has used technology throughout his presidency to get his opinion and belief out in the world. Due to the prevalence of phones like iPhones or Androids, people always have access to news and social media in their pockets. Social media has helped politicians because they are able, for instance, to tweet during a situation that impacts the country, which people are able to see on their cell phones.
Candidates are able to talk to supporters or even non supporters through social media. The online community of social media allows for candidates to see what people like and dislike. It also allows for candidates to set dates and events that supporters can come to. Social media is an easy place for political rallies and protests to be set up among the community. In this century, social media is all the rage, even in politics.
In an age where social media sits at the forefront of global connectivity and communication, the political arena has never had been more exposed the unpredictable nature of public engagement and response. It shouldn’t come as a surprise that the formality and ceremony of traditional political engagement has, to an extent, been abandoned. Throughout the course of the 2016 United States presidential elections, celebrities have used their status and personal platforms to voice their stance in the debate and name their preferred candidate. As prominent leaders of the digital sphere, the value of the celebrity voice as a vehicle for political endorsement is on the rise.
These social media tools allow politicians to speak directly to voters without spending a dime. It keeps them from reaching voters through paid advertising or earned media. It's also become very common for political campaigns to produce commercials and publish them for free on you tube instead of or in addition to paying for time on television or the radio. Alot of times journalists covering campaigns will write about those you tube ads, essentially broadcasting their message to a wider audience at no cost to the politicians. Twitter and facebook have become instrumental in organizing campaigns.
The researchers present findings that indicate that a politician’s popularity in the voting booth may be related to the frequency with which the candidate is talked about on social media. The researchers goes on to discuss how further research may conclude that social media has a bigger impact on voting outcomes than traditional forms of media, and how that could potentially shape the future of voting.
Social media including Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Youtube, Flicker, internet websites, and blogs are becoming mainstream attracting a younger more technology savvy voter. Many candidates in the last elections learned to use these mediums so not to overlook tech savvy voters and learned how to use these to their advantage. Candidates took to the internet to raise awareness, state views, and even successfully raised donations. Social media was able to provide instant feedback on the standing of a candidate often days or weeks sooner than a more traditional poll.