Optorical Analysis Of 'Animals In The Wild'

1125 Words3 Pages

Passage/Quote #1: "Animals in the wild lead lives of compulsion and necessity within an unforgiving social hierarchy in an environment where the supply of fear is high and the supply of food low and where territory must constantly be defended and parasites forever endured. What is the meaning of freedom in such a context? Animals in the wild are, in practice, free neither in space nor in time, nor in their personal relations” (16). Response/Reaction: This section is at the center of Pi 's logic on flexibility. He doesn 't characterize flexibility by an absence of bars, yet by the capacity to practice choice with one 's chance, space, and relations. Creatures, and anybody whose survival is persistently debilitated, don 't have this extravagance.
This being thus, misery is the thing that Pi fears most, and this tiger, perilous and fatal as it seems to be, stands in the middle of Pi and sadness, diverting Pi from falling into it. Because of being there for each other, Pi and Richard spare one another from misery. This quote makes me glad that I have a family. Being distant from everyone else and not knowing your family since you were born is terrible. Pi 's parents died on the boat and the main reason he has not took his own particular life is the presence of Richard Parker. Neither one of the creatures needs to be separated from everyone
Which is the better story, the story with animals or the story without animals? ' Mr. Okamoto: 'That 's an interesting question? ' Mr. Chiba: 'The story with animals. ' Mr. Okamoto: 'Yes. The story with animals is the better story. ' Pi Patel: 'Thank you. And so it goes with God. '"(317).
Response: This key passage from the book was one of the most influential quotes I have ever read. It is intriguing that after so much battle and hopelessness, Pi still keeps to his three religions and regularly shouts out "Jesus!" or starts loving Allah of the Muslim religion in times of satisfaction. It demonstrates the amount of confidence this man really has. Many people would have just said that there was no god if this circumstance would be permitted to let happen, however Pi 's line of reasoning does not stray that route by any stretch of the

Open Document