Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
who does the inspector in an inspector calls represent
who does the inspector in an inspector calls represent
who does the inspector in an inspector calls represent
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Priestley's character's usually represent social attitudes and political views (Nightingale). How does Priestley convey his beliefs through the Inspector and Birling family? Priestley conveys his beliefs through the Inspector and the Birling family in various ways. Priestly believed in ?social conscience? that we are all responsible for each other. Priestly never believed in the class system as he thought it was very unjust and divided everyone, especially poorer people, in a poorer way. Priestly?s view is shown through the Inspector in a rather convincing way which makes the audience think like an inspector. The inspector is the voice of reason, justice and socialism. In the play Birling believes in the ?Survival of the fittest? This is a motto that the inspector and Priestley do not believe. Birling believes that only the rich have the right to live and the poor and the disabled do not. Priestly has conveyed his believes in a dramatic style ? Birling is the antithesis to the Inspector which creates a successful contrast. We get a hint of Birling?s social snobbery when he says, ?When Crofts and Birlings are no longer competing but are working together- for lower costs and higher prices? This shows us how Birling regards money ? it is one of the, if not the most important thing in his life. Priestley sees Birling?s wealth as a problem ? if he didn?t have the money factory Birling would probably show more empathy towards people. Priestley believed people who have money think they are very important and do not emphasise with poorer people. He believed that it is very unjust because you cannot chose the family you are born in. Priestly?s political views are shown when Birling refers to be Lord Mayor, he believes th... ... middle of paper ... ...ildish- trying not to fact the facts? She understands that the police inspector is there to be his social conscience and so it does not matter if he was really an inspector. Sheila becomes a ?mini inspector? as she approaches his way of thinking. She is the only one who realises Eric was the person who the Inspector was talking about. She even tries to explain to Sybil Birling who at first takes no notice, ?Mother- I begged you and begged you to stop? In the novel, Priestley uses Birling to the antithesis of the Inspector whereas Sheila supports him. At the end, the audience should be on the side of Eva and the Inspector and against Birling because of his coldness. The audience should also like Sheila more because she is really caring- she even begins to question her own fiancé about the death of ?the victim? rather than focus on her own betrayed feelings.
Birling who looks down on a lower working class person, Eva Smith. When Mrs. Birling says “As if a girl of that sort would ever refuse money!” infers that Mrs. Birling is prejudice against the working-class girls. Furthermore, she also believes that do not have morals or dignity as they will take any money from people. This lets the audience know that Mrs. Birling looks down on all working-class woman as they don’t have the same level of status, income, and respect as her, thus showing her lack of remorse when talking ill about the less fortunate and how she thinks highly of herself. Mrs. Birling says this quote loudly and confidently, shown by the exclamation mark, to convey her instant thoughts about the lower class and that what she is saying is correct. The following lines by the inspector, said in a stern manner, shadows what Priestley himself would have said to Mrs. Birling because what she said is completely against the idea of everyone being part of “one body” therefore making the atmosphere tenser within the characters and the audience. This built up tension clearly indicates to the audience how Priestley feels about this topic and how important it is for him to educate his audience about treating people from different social classes with respect and
An Inspector Calls was written in 1945 but set in 1912. The play shows the stark difference between 1912 and 1945. J. B. Priestley reveals the errors of society and the faults of capitalism as well as the bias of the upper class and social status. As a firm believer in the concepts of socialism, he uses this play to expose society’s poor attitudes to the working class of the period. The way they treat Eva Smith reflects on how many of the working class may have been treated by their social superiors. Eva was a victim in society as she was very low in the financial hierarchy as well as in reality where she was at the bottom of the classes. Women at that time were seen as being delicate, obedient to their husbands. The inspector is used to correct the
A Comparison of Characters of Mr. Birling and Inspector Goole in J.B. Priestley's An Inspector Calls
...y guilty and sympathetic for what she has done, whereas Mr and Mrs Birling couldn?t care less and remain unsympathetic throughout. The way Mr and Mrs Birling don?t care makes the play interesting for the audience, as they are waiting for them to crack, the Inspector also helps maintain the audiences concentration by the way he slowly unravels the story and the way he interrogates people in the order that they met the girl.
The theme of selfishness is central to An Inspector Calls. Priestley questions the morality of the Birling and Croft
Although her contribution to the play, overall, is limited, her presence in this passage, and in the home, is a constant reminder of the more unfortunate, lower classes of the British society in 1912, which will always exist in the nation if the more conservative, individualistic people – such as the Birlings – are kept in power in Britain. Symbolically, she is the one to open the door to the inspector (i.e. the poorer people are the only ones who welcome the arrival of socialism in the country), despite the ignorance of Mr. Birling towards his [the inspector’s] presence (i.e. the richer, individualistic people in 1912 are reluctant to allow socialism to gain power/enter the politics of Britain – at the cost of their own wealth and prosperity). Edna is also evidence of the richer society’s ignorance and rudeness towards the lower classes and, in a sense, is seen as Priestley’s physical embodiment within the
In conclusion, Priestley presents Birling as a pompous, morally corrupt ruthless patriarch from the industrial ruling class. Through his presentation of Birling, he undermines the views for which Birling stands namely capitalism and conservativism. The purpose of his play ‘An Inspector Calls’ was to tell the post war audience of 1945 that the patriarchal Edwardian Era was not a time to be envied, and it was unwise to think of returning to that era. He displays the younger generation as the one which is sympathetic and the one which is prepared to change its ways and admit its wrongs. Priestley’s presentation of Birling highlights his own thoughts on the political issues of the time.
When the Inspector enters, his manner conflicts with Mr Birling’s, as well as his opinion of society. He is relatively reserved, although he is not intimidated to ask questions to the Birling’s ...
The Inspector, straight form his introduction, is commanding and authoritative. Upon his entrance he creates, “…at once an impression of massiveness, solidity and purposefulness.”(PG.11) The Inspector continues to create this impression as he progresses through his speeches and through his interrogation of the family. The Inspector remains confident, sturdy and composed, while people around him crumble and fall to pieces. His ‘solidity’ is proven by the fact he remains on task despite numerous attempts from Birling to digress from the points he is making. The Inspector is told to appear ‘purposeful’; this is shown where he explains to Birling that Birlings way of thinking “Every man must only look out for himself,” is not the case, and all warps of society are interlinked. The view is best illustrated in the Inspectors final speech, where he says, “We don't live alone. We are members of one body. We are responsible for each other.”(p.56). This idea is one that Priestley, himself believed in deeply, and many of Priestleys writing shared this very theme.
In the exposition when Mrs. Birling said to Sheila “ When you are married you will realize that men with important work to do sometimes spend nearly all their time and energy on business. You will have to get used to that, just as I had“. This quotation shows that Sybil really obeyed her husband and dared not to challenge or question her husband’s actions, as the phrase ‘just as I had’ could imply that she does not receive enough attention from Arthur. Yet the way it is phrased suggests that she expects that the same kind of treatment should happen to Sheila. This is different to Sheila, as she clearly has voiced out her opinion to Arthur without any hesitation, this defies the social norms that she should have respect Arthur. Furthermore, near the climax where Sheila has matured and is no longer afraid to defy her father or when she withdrew her engagement with Gerald. In the climax, Sheila says “ You knew it then. You
The Inspector is never wrong- in any of the situations that occur throughout the play- he is always right, and makes the other characters seem almost stupid if they do not agree with him. ?Don?t start on that. I want to get on?? That reflects off from the writer, Priestley, as being very determined to convey his message across to his audience.
Priestley mainly uses the characters in the play to present his views, especially Mr and Mrs Birling, to present his ideas about class and society. In the Birling family, Mrs Birling is the most upper class, and is always referring to the lower class female factory workers such as Eva Smith as ‘girls of that class’. She seems to think that working class people are not humans at all.
The Play ‘An Inspector Calls’ is a modern morality play, created by J. B. Priestley. A morality play is a play that is designed to teach the audience the difference between right and wrong; the morality of this play is a Christian and socialist morality. The play encapsulates on the Christian religious morality that you should treat people the way you want to be treated to ‘love thy neighbour as thy self’. J. B. Priestley was a socialist who believed that everyone was created equally and should be treated equally. He believed in this despite his lack of faith. Priestley presents this moral message and his politics and opinions through the Inspector who is a God-like figure and serves as a conscience for both the audience and the Birling family. The Inspector also serves a peculiar but important role in the play. The Inspector teaches the Birling family morality and serves them a conscience. The Inspector is nothing more than a phantasm or illusion, as we know from the end of the play. Priestley’s moral is mixed between his politics and the beliefs of a Christian. As a socialist J. B. Priestley expresses his opinions through this play, in the time politicians were hated so Priestley used the play as a device to put his points forward. The play was not just a political view; it was his personal dream and passion to write an entertaining play. He creates it as a detective play because they were interesting, popular and the audience could also try to crack the mystery themselves, this was a very intelligent and unique way of expressing his opinions, as he knew they would be heard this way.
The play is very simplistic and overtly political. It heavily features varying aspects of non-illusory theatre to semaphor Priestley's political message. When reading the play, it is important to remember that the characters are not people but caricatures Priestley employs to manipulate the reader. This combines with the artificiality of the plot to form a completely biased play, from whichever angle one looks at it. However at the time of its publication it was not so outlandish, because it upheld the New Labour government, struggling so hard to bring about its reforms and stay in favour of a people who had suffered many hardships and were now looking to more years of difficulty and discomfort.
Andrew Undershaft and Alfred Doolittle, two characters from Bernard Shaw's plays Major Barbara and Pygmalion, have a similar nature but strikingly different views of morality and poverty. Undershaft is an "unashamed" capitalist, and nothing clouds his view of his business plans. Doolittle is a man who would much rather have a life of poverty than be troubled with the responsibility of being well-off. Although their perspectives differ, they both live for themselves.