Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Russian revolution 5th grade
Russian revolution 5th grade
Modern social revolutions
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Russian revolution 5th grade
Theda Skocpol defines social revolutions as “rapid, basic transformations of a society’s state and class structures…accompanied and in part carried through by class-based revolts from below” (4). During its course, a social revolution may experience a period of radicalization in which the initial revolutionary regime is overthrown by a more radical one that implements policies which overturn most aspects of the Old Regime and replaces them with extremist new ones. These policies result in a period of widespread Terror during which the state detains and or executes mass numbers of people for crimes that may or may not have been committed. To account for radicalization, which occurred in both France and Russia, one must begin by identifying two fundamental variables. The first, the initial revolutionary seizure of power by a non-radical group, occurred in France October of 1791 and in Russia February of 1917. The second, the failure of radical polities to appease a large majority of the masses, had begun to play out in France by 1793 and in Russia by November of 1917. By tracing the effects of these variables over time, the phenomenon of radicalization can then be explained.
Two prevailing theories that attempt to account for radicalization are the modernization theory, championed by Samuel Huntington, and the aggregate-psychological theory, posited by Ted Gurr. In the modernization theory, Huntington states that a “revolution becomes more radical as larger and larger masses of the population are brought into the political scales” (41). Huntington argues this empowers radical groups by spurring their popularity and in turn allows them to create “a new political order” under their rule (41). Yet, as the cases of France and Russia w...
... middle of paper ...
..., in both Russia and France, seized complete control of the state in order to maximize their power and implement their policies. Furthermore, fear of losing this newly gained power to resistance forces that disapproved of their politics, turned the Bolsheviks and the Jacobins to eliminate all threats, culminating in a period of widespread Terror within each country.
Works Cited
Doyle, William. The Oxford History of the French Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
Huntington, Samuel P., and Jack A. Goldstone. Revolutions: Theoretical, Comparative, and Historical Studies. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1986.
Pipes, Richard. A Concise History of the Russian Revolution. New York: Knopf, 1995.
Skocpol, Theda. States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative analysis of France, Russia, and China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.
The fight for change and liberty has been no stranger to this world. Since 2740 BC, over hundreds of revolutions and rebellions have taken place, all of which demanded a reform or a change of some nature. Within the last century many major revolutions have been developing in continents such as Asia and Africa. In the non-fiction book The Political Thought of the American Revolution, written by Clinton Rossiter, Rossiter claims that perhaps modern revolutions, such as these in Asia and Africa, have deviated far from the core foundations of the American Revolution. In this book, Rossiter conveys that the American Revolution was the first revolution to have success from breaking away from another country and government. He believes that many revolutions
Petrou, Micheal. “Inside A Revolution.” Maclean’s 127.9 (2014): 20. MAS Ultra - School Edition. Web. 5 Mar. 2014
Before the revolution formally began, France was being ruled by the monarch Napoleon Bonaparte. All people under him, particularly the third party members also known as the working class, were oppressed in a sense that they were powerless against the laws that wronged them while bestowing the monarchy more power. The ruler of a country or empire should have one goal: to ensure that the people of the country are taken care of. As Napoleon was not adhering to this basic moral law of power the people grew upset about the little they could do to help themselves, and decided the best course of action would be to overthrow the government. Once the monarchy was overtaken the bourgeoisie temporarily assumed power which worked for a short time. Soon however, multiple rebel groups rose to power, subjecting all those not associated with them to the two year Reign of Terror. During this time, many civilians and previous government officials were executed. The consequence of the rebellion yielded predictable results. Like before, the people outside the direct government suffered as they could do nothing to prevent wrongdoing from befalling them. Both during Napoleon’s rule and the rule of the rebels, powerlessness influenced an ascent to despotism that left the people of the country
Evolutionary events within any social structure bounded by injustice from moral instability becomes defiant for reason where sacrifice is just, inhumane practice of servitude to lower orientations or class of people fuel hatred enough to over through the standing regime responsible. King, court, or judicial representations of country, state or province shares responsibilities to a lawful or successful sovereignty. Russian revolution of the early twentieth century gave rise to two factions of revolutionary groups; (RSDLP) Bolsheviks were a
A great revolutionary once said, “The revolution is not an apple that falls when it is ripe. You have to make it fall.” The revolutionary in this quote, Che Guevara, epitomizes the notion that revolutions are not a random occurrence but rather a continuous push for a fundamental change. In the framework of revolutions that have occurred in the world, most notably those that have occurred in Britain, America, France, and Haiti; one realizes that the elements of competition and mass mobilization are intrinsic to understanding the successes of each revolutionary movement. Yet, the catalysts and societal implications for each of these revolutions provides different venues of implementation that separates it from others.
“Europe cannot conceive of life without Kings and nobles; and we cannot conceive of it with them. Europe is lavishing her blood to preserve her chains, whereas we are lavishing ours to destroy them”(Maximilien Robespierre). For centuries upon centuries, the monarchal system had dominated European life. The very nature of this method of rule incited rebellious feelings, as a definite imbalance of power was present. Understandably, people under this system had risen against authority. The glorious nation of France was no exception. The eighteenth century brought about a great deal of economic and social turmoil. By the end of this one hundred year period, rebellion had been talked about by many citizens for quite some time. However, no definitive action was taken until one man stepped to the forefront; Maximilien Robespierre. Born in Arras, France about thirty years prior to the French Revolution, Robespierre was an immensely intelligent man as is seen from his ability to read and write fluently from the age of eight (the Force of 10). Robespierre rose from fairly humble origins to become a provincial lawyer, advancing further to become a representative in the Estates General, and eventually ascending to the leader of the French Revolution itself. For its sake he sent thousands to the guillotine, overthrew a monarchy, declared a new national religion, and invigorated the will of a nation. “No individual of the French Revolutionary era, with the exception of Napolean Bonaparte, has excited more passion in his time than the…dedicated provincial lawyer, Maximilien Robespierre”(Maximilien 1). During this era, Robespierre led France’s world inspiring cry for the liberation of mankind and petrified the world with its relentle...
The working classes’ unrest and radicalism in this period was motivated primarily by their economic and pecuniary environment. This economic milieu which incorporated the working classes of the nineteenth century was the fundamental basis from which unrest sprang; it was the origin of their motivation, rationale and, to the limited extent it existed, their solidarity. In this context radicalism found purchase; it capitalised on the latent political energy of the working class, emergent amongst the economic malaise that followed the end of twenty-three years of war in 1815, as well as the failure of Luddism
As the Reign of Terror in France grew and invoked fear the internal threats became more radical and deadly. The French Revolution began in 1789 as an attempt to create a new and fair government. (Doc A) As year four of freedom lurched the thirst for power in Maximilien Robespierre stirred and the hunger for more blood provoked him urging him to create the Reign of Terror. 1793, the first year of the Reign of Terror, Robespierre grasped on to his new power and as the revolution spun out of control the Jacobins Club established a new way to “fight enemies” by constructing a Committee of Public Safety and a Tribunal Court. (Doc A) This new government was working swell it contained counterrevolutionaries in the Vendée Region, and it smothered and ferreted the internal threats. (Docs A, C, G) The counterrevolutionaries adopted a name that meant trouble – the rabble. (Doc D) In a letter written by a city official of the Town of Niort a...
Feudalist France was a rich, powerful, and respected nation for hundreds of years- until it appeared to collapse like house of cards in the breeze. The catalyst for this change could be attributed to several causes, but ultimately it was the actions of one group that furthered the revolution most. Maturity enabled the bourgeoisie to dispute their position in society, seeing their lack of political voice as an irrefutable issue. Furthermore, they put their goals of change into effect by shifting France’s sovereignty. In short, the bourgeoisie were most influential in furthering the French Revolution because of their drive for political participation.
Across Europe, the revolutionaries of 1848 came from a variety of different social backgrounds and they all held different political beliefs. They could be liberals, republicans, nationalists or socialists and therefore they all wanted different things out of the Revolutions. Each group was also internally divided, with a radical faction and a more moderate one. Initially they all joined forces to overthrow the existing regimes with which they were discontent. However once power was in their hands, they found that ‘Revolutionary Consensus’ was virtually impossible. Their initial victory was “followed by ensuing struggle to implement change”5. The people had taken to the streets not knowing what they would do if they did manage to take power. Now that they had, because of their different individual aims, they found it hard to compromise. This eventually led to a growing split between moderates and radicals, as well as between social classes, particularly in France. The moderates did not want a government based on universal male...
Social Revolutions in the Modern World is a compilation of essays, which updates and expands arguments Skocpol posed years earlier regarding social revolutions in her previous book, States and Social Revolutions. The updated arguments seek to explain how we can better understand recent revolutionary upheavals in countries across the globe and why social revolutions have happened in some countries, but not in others. Throughout the book, Skocpol illustrates how ideas about states and societies can aid in identifying the particular types of regimes that are susceptible to the growth of revolutionary movements as well as those that are vulnerable to seizure of state power by revolutionary aggressors. Skocpol argu...
An unrelenting series of war’s, Unnecessary hunger and famines and the selfish greed of the ruling elite. These are some of the many reasons, along with the Romanov family’s inability to lead either troops in modern warfare or the Russian population into a modern industrialised society that brought about the inevitability of the 1917 Russian revolution and thus, The USSR.
As the Reign of Terror continued on, the gap between the right and wrong gradually began to widen. Those who stood for the revolution, particularly peasants, began to find themselves stretched between liberty and oppression. The Reign of Terror began by striking fear into the hearts of citizens and those who led it could find no other way to establish their reign. The revolution had continued on for long enough, and observers from the outside were waiting for France to mend the wounds that continued to fester.
Revolution is a topic at the heart of the Socialist and Marxist Ideology. The processes that bring about the insurrection vary, but for Marx and Engels, the only viable coup d’état is a violent one, that will enable a transition to the best society and human life. In Marxism, revolution is inevitable because of precedents set by developmental historicism and then inequality rampant in society. These negative and traditional attributes give rise to class-consciousness in a manner that promotes the inexorable path of society from capitalism to socialism.
Kort, Michael. "Reform, Reaction, and Revolution in Russia." Facts on File. N.p., n.d. Web. 12 Oct. 2014.