Slavery and the American Civil War

1234 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: development of slavery

Slavery “War is at best barbarism….Its glory is all moonshine….War is hell. (Union General William Tecumseh Sherman) A wise quote by an even wiser man, The Civil War was agreed a “hell”. For four years (1862-1865) a war was fought between both Northern Union states and Southern Confederate states over the matter of slavery. During this time period many changes were happening in the United States; the election of an anti-slavery president, Southern states trying to secede to become their own independent country. These factors and many more including slavery were the main causes of The Civil War. To begin slavery was the main income for southern states. Many would argue that tobacco or cotton was main profits for Southern states, but we can all agree that without slavery there would be no gatherings of both products. The Southern states would believe that slavery is acceptable; they would do so by scaring people into believing that “Defenders of slavery argued that the sudden end to the slave economy would have had a profound and killing economic impact in the South where reliance on slave labor was the foundation of their economy. The cotton economy would collapse. The tobacco crop would dry in the fields. Rice would cease being profitable.” Slave owners were looking for a way to maximize the use of slaves, in doing so Eli Whitney created the cotton gin1. Since this revolutionary machine was increasing the production of cotton it required for more slaves to be put to work in fields. During this same time in the union states happened to be more industrialized and didn’t require as much slavery as Confederate states did, this led to slavery being- -unacceptable thus rendering it as illegal. In this time The Enlightenment2 period ... ... middle of paper ... ...ies and go embark on their own journeys. Whether or not you agree with Confederate or you’d agree with more of the Unions ideas it is all based on history, without historical research or any account on this war I believe that we could all agree that in the end the victor is the one who is fighting for the cause of the little man. The little man is the person who can’t stand alone, whose hope is all placed into your arms. In The Civil War the little man would be viewed as the slaves, and their savior was the Union troops who willingly gave their life up so that they would be set free from their slave holders grasp. In conclusion the North had viewed slavery as morally wrong, but the South required it for their businesses both agricultural and industrial to not only survive but thrive. The Civil War not only fought for morality but for a group of people’s economy.

Show More
Related

  • Blacks in Civil War Portrayed in The Movie Glory

    1297 Words  | 3 Pages

    The American Civil War was a major war in the United States between the Union and eleven Southern states which declared that they had a right to secession and formed the Confederate States of America. They were led by Jefferson Davis who was elected as their president. The Union, led by President Abraham Lincoln and the Republican Party, opposed the expansion of slavery into territories owned by the United States and rejected any right of secession. The United States Civil War began as an effort to save the Union but it ended in a fight to abolish slavery. Tens of thousands of soldiers on each side, in battle after battle, had the courage to march in regular order against the withering fire of the defenders, while those around them fell with hideous and usually fatal wounds for many different reasons. Southerners fought for their rights and their way of life. Blacks for on another and for the end of slavery. Northerners fought to keep the Union together and latter on the end of slavery. Blacks fought for Religion, to demonstrate to all that blacks are just as capable as whites in battle and to show Gods righteousness.

    Read More

  • The Northern culture versus the Southern culture and How did they impact the Civil War

    950 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the end, I believe the war’s end results came down to the cultures of each side’s economy and the cultures in their military style. Obviously, the North had more of the advantage in resources than the South but the Confederates put up a good fight to conserve their way of life. The Civil War demonstrates how different cultures, economies, and their political strategies can affect how well we do in battle. Things can be accomplished when one army is well equipped and prepared with the right resources.

    Read More

  • Economic Difference as the Main Cause of the Civil War

    758 Words  | 2 Pages

    Slavery was merely one of the causes of the Civil War. Some historians argue that the political difference between the North and the South is a more influential cause of the Civil War while some insist that economic is the main cause. In fact, the political division between the North and the South was affected by the differences in the economic system of both. The North and the South had had different economic backgrounds that were established since the American colonial period. These economic differences from the colonial period brought about the political division that was based on preserving each other’s own wealth or property and eventually caused the Civil War.

    Read More

  • Civil War and The South's Loss

    1824 Words  | 4 Pages

    First, the South couldn’t have won the civil war because state’s rights prevented unification of the South. The very issue that created the Confederacy helped to destroy it. In waging war, the South faced problems of politics and government that greatly complicated its problem of economic mobilization. No one would deny the troublesome effect of the conflict generated by differing ideas of how best to protect liberty and to organize southern society for the war effort. Southern people insisted upon retaining their democratic liberties in wartime, which proved fatal for the South. They had to struggle with a “confederacy formed by particularistic politicians [that] could hardly be expected to adopt promptly those centralists polices which victory demanded” (Donald, p. 26). Individual state governors fought bitterly with Jefferson Davis to prevent him from consolidating power to fight the war. They withheld troops and supplies while the Confederate Congress spent its time arguing over the rights of the states instead of prosecuting a war of national survival. Many internal conflicts within the South were acquiring and weakening the South’s unity. Internal conflicts caused confederate officials to choose between moving troops from the coasts and strengthening their armies, or leaving the...

    Read More

  • Who Was To Blame For The Civil War

    886 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Union is to blame for the civil war, particularly the northern states because the federal union’s goal was to not promote conformity, but to permit diversity within the orderly confines of any socialized community (Niven 311). The union could easily be considered a haven for all types of people, not just slaves. From 1830 until 1860, relatively few immigrants settled in the South (Meyers). The Northern states had a different vision of what they wanted America to be and strongly opposed how the South ran things. The southern states thrived off slavery and is mainly how people made a living in that region. Slavery is the cornerstone of a social order that protected individual liberty and equality for the white population in the south (Niven 311). Meaning that the North had way more resources, workers, and support in comparison to the South, so slavery was a way for the Southern states to at least stay relevant in the United States of America. The North’s feelings about how slavery was tearing the country and the union apart was the spark for the Civil War.

    Read More

  • Slavery, The Constitutional, And The Origins Of The Civil War

    1066 Words  | 3 Pages

    Throughout the years, many people have been taught that the reason the Civil War happened, was to abolish slavery all through the United States. Although that is true, there were more reasons why the Civil War occurred.Referencing will be done on different articles and writers to support the findings of the authors. The article “Slavery, the Constitutional, and the Origins of the Civil War” by Paul Finkelman, discusses about the North (union) and the South (confederacy) and the disagreement of the territories following the constitutional laws regarding slavery, the article explores both sides of the territories and their beliefs of how the situation of slavery should have been dealt with. The article “The Economic Origins of the Civil War” by Marc Egnal, discusses the North’s (union) and the South’s (confederacy) economic situation that could have pushed the two territories to engage in war with one another. Finally, the last article “Politics, Ideology, and the Origins of the American Civil War” by Eric Foner, focuses on the Norths (union) and Souths (confederacy) views on politics and ideas of how each territory is ran and how they have affected the North and the South. These historians supplied specific and different explanations that explained what exactly caused the United States to enter into a Civil War. With the information provided by the authors, the evidence will lead us to the answer of what caused the Civil War.

    Read More

  • The American Revolution’s Effect on the Institution of Slavery

    800 Words  | 2 Pages

    Slavery allowed the American economy to flourish for over 300 years. It allowed many Southern states to grow at a furious pace without significantly diversifying their economy. The South relied on the harvesting of cash crops such as tobacco and cotton, which were very labor intensive. Without much cheap labor, slaves were relied on to harvest the crops; this provided enormous value to farmers and plantation owners in the region. However, the institution of slavery was challenged in the 18th century by decades of Enlightenment thought, newfound religious ideals, and larger abolitionist groups. After the American Revolution many states would ban the practice of slavery completely and only a few would maintain the “peculiar institution”.

    Read More

  • The American Civil War: Interpretations of Democracy

    1411 Words  | 3 Pages

    One of the most convoluted themes in history is that of the meaning of war. The American Civil War specifically offers many differing explanations as to the true cause for which over 600,000 men dedicated and lost their lives. The Civil War was particularly so, in that there was no universal acceptance of the objectives or causes of the war from either side. Leaders from the Union and the Confederacy delineated distinctly different reasons for fighting, magnifying the hostility between the two regions both before and during wartime. The Confederacy insisted that, based on overwhelming sentiments, its secession was an inevitability that was within the bounds of constitutional law. The South justified this secession and subsequent violence by claiming that the federal government had become tyrannical and was infringing on state rights. In the years leading up to the Civil War, a matter that was pertinent for both sides was the issue of the implementation of slavery into newly admitted states as the nation expanded westward. The subject of slavery in this instance was more political than it was moral, as the issue revolved around the concept of representation in Congress. The North focused its efforts on preventing the union from dividing into separate factions. From the Union standpoint, the Civil War represented a fight to protect the union of the states and the future of democracy for the entire world. The Civil War, for both the Union and the Confederacy, was a fight for the preservation of each side’s conception of legal and natural rights as they pertain to liberty for all.

    Read More

  • Special Field Order 15 Essay

    1195 Words  | 3 Pages

    Especially since the South had 11 states within its territory, compared to the North containing 23 states. While the North’s “industrialists invested in the expansion of railroads and textile mills, ” the South’s economy relied heavily on cotton farming (Lecture 8/29). But when taxes on imported and exported goods began, this negatively affected the Southern economy and improved the Northern economy. In consideration of the South depending on selling cotton overseas and the North being increasingly industrialized, the South’s profits began to decrease, through the encouragement that America should trade within sections of the country. To further the economic cause of the civil war, it was apparent that “the trade balance was in favor of the North” (Fontanilla). With cotton being the backbone of the Southern economic strength, many feared that without slavery, every aspect of Southern would go down and life would turn into shambles. All of the South felt threatened by the abolition of slavery and the fading economy in their states, which added more fuel for Confederates and Unionists to go to

    Read More

  • Slavery as the Cause of the American Civil War

    1746 Words  | 4 Pages

    The American Civil War was the bloodiest military conflict in American history leaving over 500 thousand dead and over 300 thousand wounded (Roark 543-543). One might ask, what caused such internal tension within the most powerful nation in the world? During the nineteenth century, America was an infant nation, but toppling the entire world with its social, political, and economic innovations. In addition, immigrants were migrating from their native land to live the American dream (Roark 405-407). Meanwhile, hundreds of thousand African slaves were being traded in the domestic slave trade throughout the American south. Separated from their family, living in inhumane conditions, and working countless hours for days straight, the issue of slavery was the core of the Civil War (Roark 493-494). The North’s growing dissent for slavery and the South’s dependence on slavery is the reason why the Civil War was an inevitable conflict. Throughout this essay we will discuss the issue of slavery, states’ rights, American expansion into western territories, economic differences and its effect on the inevitable Civil War.

    Read More

  • North Vs South Civil War Essay

    1453 Words  | 3 Pages

    The North is characterized as a cold rocky place, largely unsuitable for the farming lifestyle. Whereas the South had huge swaths of farmable land and a warm climate. These realities led to vastly different economies. The framework of the North’s economy being factories and the South’s stemming from manual labor. As the North modernized itself, through the building of railroads and automation of factories, its Southern counterpart remained stagnant as the result of an agrarian economy driven by slave labor. With these immutable environments forcing the North to industrialize and the South to farm, a division was created. The division was the need for slaves. A place built around factories is not in such dire need for free labor as the huge farms of the South are. The South lost the second they decided to continue on the abominable path of slavery while refusing the alternate option of industry. Physical realities soon transformed into political ones and the game of prolonging the Armageddon of our country

    Read More

  • Slavery During The Pre-Civil War

    420 Words  | 1 Pages

    Lastly, they used economic arguments. The south contained so much cotton that really needed to be picked. The North had a much more developed economy, which was more prominently based on industry and shipping instead of agriculture. The south did not have this benefit. So therefore, the southern state’s economy was much more fragile and dependent on the practice of slavery. Since the south grew 60% of the world’s cotton and provided approximately 70% of the cotton consumed by the British cloth business, their economy was heavily dependent on the institution and common practice of slavery. With these numbers, and the southern logic, they argued that without slavery, their economy would crumble into a

    Read More

  • Economic Differences In The Civil War

    205 Words  | 1 Pages

    The way that the Economies, Societies, and Politics from the North and South contributed differences in the Civil War is that the North and South differences. The economics of the North had increased population due of values contrasted and future visions. ‘’The economic differences between the North and South contributed to the rise of regional populations with contrasting values and visions for the future’’ (North and South, N/d). The South’s economy was on slaves and large farms or plantations. The societies were and were not balanced. The South’s population consisted more of slaves than white people, but they considered them as properties as well as one-third of a person. The North’s society was calmer and had less plantations or farms.

    Read More

  • Slavery in America between 1800 and 1860

    724 Words  | 2 Pages

    Within the economy a great development had been achieved when the upper south handed its power to the lower south all due to the rise of an agricultural production. This expansion was led by the excessive growth of cotton in the southern areas. It spread rapidly throughout America and especially in the South. During these times it gave another reason to keep the slavery at its all time high. Many wealthy planters started a ‘business’ by having their slaves work the cotton plantations, which this was one of a few ways slavery was still in full effect. Not only were there wealthy planters, at this time even if you were a small slave-holder you were still making money. While all of this had been put into the works, Americans had approximately 410,000 slaves move from the upper south to the ‘cotton states’. This in turn created a sale of slaves in the economy to boom throughout the Southwest. If there is a question as to ‘why’, then lets break it d...

    Read More

  • Abraham Lincoln During The Civil War Essay

    899 Words  | 2 Pages

    Slavery in the south became a popular way to make money. Within 50 years the amount of slaves rose from around 1,190,000 to nearly 4,000,000. Around the time that slavery became profitable in the south, a surge of democratic reform crowded the North and West (Britannica School). As the demand to make profit increased, slavery increased also. The northern states were mostly anti slavery states and believed that slavery was morally wrong and cruel. These beliefs caused tension between the northern and southern states. In Britannica School, the article American Civil War explains, “More and more northerns became convinced that slavery should not be allowed to spread to new territories” ()Northerners felt as if slavery was taking more jobs away

    Read More

More about Slavery and the American Civil War

Open Document