Three years ago the economy was near full employment, people were spending money care-free and the financial markets were roaring along. Fast forward three years and the economy is in an awful recession, consumers’ ability to spend has been evaporated, and the financial markets are among the worst in the last 100 years. Yet I ask a simple question: where is all the money?
Some argue it evaporated when consumers extracted equity from their homes and spent it. But they spent it which means it went to someone. What did those people do with it? Some argue banks lent irresponsibly (which they did) to borrowers who could not pay back the loans. But those borrowers spent that money on houses, cars, goods and services. What did those recipients of that spending do with the money? Some argue that Wall Street packaged and re-packaged practically worthless securities and sold them to unsuspecting investors (which they did) for lucrative fees. But Wall Street spent the money on big buildings, airplanes, fat salaries and bonuses. The recipients of the fat salaries and bonuses then spent the money on more cars and houses and vacations and so on. The question still remains: where is all the money?
Three years ago all the money floating around the system was enough to keep most people very happy. The population has increased modestly in the last three years, but hardly enough to absorb that much money. The money was not burned, shredded or carted off to landfills. If all the money that was floating around the system was more than enough to keep most people very happy, and all that money is still floating around the system, why are things so different now? Where did all the money go?
I can only hypothesize that massive amou...
... middle of paper ...
...ies designed to determine what would encourage them to stop hoarding money. What would they spend money on? What would they invest in? Whom would they lend to and under what conditions? By determining what would encourage the existing money to start flowing again we could potentially tip the scale without the side effect of extraordinary inflation.
I will end this with an open call to those entities with enough money to be a player in this game. You know who you are because your net worth is measured in billions. Pick up the phone, get in a plane and get together and talk. The printing press is churning out incredible amounts of money and the cash you are hoarding will be worth less and less as a result. The economy moves in cycles and one way or another we will emerge from this cycle. But it would be nice if we emerge without milk costing $10 a gallon.
There was too much OPM (“Other People's Money”) that tripled from 1921 to 1940. Decline in value against fixed debt was large, but less severe than in Great Recession.
Because there were so many mortgages on houses that could not be paid back, millions of mortgages were foreclosed on, and the houses were repossessed.... ... middle of paper ... ... Banks need to make sound investments as well.
In 1913, the Federal Reserve system was created. The majority of Americans banks were small but, individual institutions that had to rely on their own resources. When there was a panic, depositors rushed to take their money out of their banks. The Reserve System wasn’t capable of giving the money because there wasn’t enough on the reserve. On account of this, world trade fame to a halt. Germany had to fork out 33 billion dollars in reparations pay without borrowing money from American banks. In addition to
In the 1920s, it seemed as if the stock market was the safest and easiest way of gaining money. When people heard of this, they started to purchase stocks as well, but by stock speculation. Stock speculation was the purchasing of stocks without any knowledge of the company’s financial situation, meaning people just assumed that every stock would give them a profit. To make matters worse, banks began loaning out money to investors, in order for them to purchase stocks. Soon enough, in early 1929, banks were receiving many warnings about loaning too much money. However, this did not pose a real threat to banks or investors, for they thought that the stock market was just going to keep on going up. Unfortunately, this was not the
On an October morning, the United States woke up and realized that the stock market had crashed. Everyone was shocked and confused. The people lost most if not all of their possessions. The Great Depression was during the 1930s and made people do, think, and feel in many ways they hadn’t. They had to conserve what they had and most of the time it was nothing. They felt sad, scared, and confused in a different way. It wasn’t just the people it was the government, the police, the authority, and even the other neighboring countries of the United States. According to Maury Klein in Rainbow’s End she says, “Black Thursday, 1929. The market opened, said one broker, ‘Like a bolt out of hell.’ The dreaded tsunami of selling crashed down at once. Never had so many orders poured in so fast from so many places; 1.6 million shares changed hands in the first half hour alone and the pace never slowed. No sooner was a phone hung up than it rang again.” The rich became poor. The poor became poorer. The people with money were scared to share it thinking they might lose all of it. No one trusted anyone except themselves and their family. Money is the key to survival in this world. But during that time the people were poor. They didn’t have money, so how did they survive?
There is perhaps no other political issue in our contemporary society that is more pertinent, pervasive, and encompassing than a nation’s economy. From the first coins used in Greece and the Asia Minor in the 7th century BCE, to the earliest uses of paper money, history has proven time and time again that the control of a region’s economy is absolutely crucial to maintaining social stability and prosperity. Yet, for over a century scholars have continued to speculate why the United States, one of the world’s strongest and most influential countries, has one of the most unstable economies. Although the causes of this economic instability can be attributed to multiple factors, nearly all economists agree that they have a common ancestor: the Federal Reserve Bank – the official central bank of the United States. Throughout the course of this paper, I will attempt to determine whether or not there is a causal relationship between the Federal Reserve Bank’s monetary policies and the decline of the U.S. economy. I will do this through a brief analysis of the history and role of this institution, in addition to the central banking system in general. In turn, I will argue that the reckless and intentional manipulation of the economy by the Federal Reserve Bank, through inflation and the abolishment of the gold standard, has led to the current economic crisis in the United States.
] This catastrophic event is caused by the accumulation of a large scale of speculation by not only investors but also banks and institutions in the stock market. Though the unemployment rate was climbing during the 1920s and economy was not looking good, people on Wall Street were not affected by the depressing news. The optimism spread from Wall Street to small investors and they were investing with the money they don’t have, which is investing on margin as high as 90%. When the speculative bubble burst, people lost everything including houses and pensions. The main reason ...
The problem with balancing an economy is that human judgment and evaluation of economic situations enter into the equation. Establishing a constant growth level in the money supply would eliminate the decision making process of the central banker. The problem with human intervention is the short-sided nature of many of the policies designed to aid the economy. Such interventions, which yields unintended negative consequences, is the result of the time inconsistency problem. This problem is understood through situations during which central bankers conduct monetary policy in a discretionary way and pursue expansionary policies that are attractive in the short-run, but lead to detrimental long-run outcomes. Friedman believes that by leaving money growth decisions to an individual, the results are poor long-run management and eventually high inflation rates, an obvious detriment to the economy.
The term Monetary policy refers to the method through which a country’s monetary authority, such as the Federal Reserve or the Bank of England control money supply for the aim of promoting economic stability and growth and is primarily achieved by the targeting of various interest rates. Monetary policy may be either contractionary or expansionary whereby a contractionary policy reduces the money supply, reduces the rate at which money is supplied or sets about an increase in interest rates. Expansionary policies on the other hand increase the supply of money or lower the interest rates. Interest rates may also be referred to as tight if their aim is to reduce inflation; neutral, if their aim is neither inflation reduction nor growth stimulation; or, accommodative, if aimed at stimulating growth. Monetary policies have a great impact on the economic stability of a country and if not well formulated, may lead to economic calamities (Reinhart & Rogoff, 2013). The current monetary policy of the United States Federal Reserve while being accommodative and expansionary so as to stimulate growth after the 2008 recession, will lead to an economic pitfall if maintained in its current state. This paper will examine this current policy, its strengths and weaknesses as well as recommendations that will ensure economic stability.
At the time, there were not adequate facilities available to meet the demand for additional funds. Bank’s reserves of money were stored around the nation at 50 locations. The reserves were not able to be shifted quickly to the areas that were experiencing increases in withdraw demand. The immobility of reserves only added another element to the financial panic (Schlesinger pp. 41). The credit situation would become tense. Since the banks coul...
Money has evolved with the times and is a reflection of the progress of man. Early money was itself a physical commodity, grain, gold or silver. During the vital stage, more symbolic forms of money such as certificates of deposit, bank notes, checks, letters of credit, bonds and other forms of negotiable securities came into prominence. Social development transformed money in to a trust, “In God We Trust' it says on the back of the ten-dollar bill.” (The Ascent of Money, 27) Today money is faith in the person paying us and belief in the person issuing the money he uses or the institution that honors his money. This trust has no end it can be extended to a greater number of individuals.
Two months after the stock market crash, stockholders lost more than fourteen million dollars; it dropped more than 40%. It continued to decrease; it went down to nearly 90% from its 1929 highs. Before the crash the 1920s were known for the roaring twenties, parties, extravagant outfits, and the music. It was the decade where people were known to spend money, they were not afraid of spending it. But when banks started to crash that is when people started to panic and was trying to get their money back, millions of Americans lost fortunes. This caused companies to lose their values and no longer be able to afford to stay in business. William C. Durant joined the Rockefeller family and other financial giants to buy big stocks to prove to the people their assurance in the market but they failed to stop decline in prices. According to the website Globalyceum, US gross domestic product, in 1929 $103.6 billion, in 1930 $91.2, in 1931 $76.5, in 1932 $58.7, in 1933 $56.4. The total size of the American economy, restrained by gross local product, suddenly dropped following the crash on Wall Street from $103.6 billion to $66
Upon the banks having to shut down completely, people began to lose their savings. All of their hard earned money was just suddenly taken away as in if they never had any money in the first place. People that suffered from losing their entire savings from the banks eventually began getting frustrated the government.
Here's the scenario: "Recent global developments have pushed the economy into a slump. Industrial production is sluggish and it has become difficult to stimulate demand. The Real GDP is slipping and though inflation looks to be under control, unemployment seems to be soaring. As the Chairman of the Federal Reserve appointed by the President of Oval Office, an effective control of the money supply has to be done.
...ies like this one have already been implemented mainly to reduce the overall budget deficit, rather than to reduce inflation.