Should There Be Restrictions to Freedom of Speech

Should there be restrictions to freedom of speech synonyms, and is there a scarcity of freedom that is given to individuals? Freedom to the people has been Americas greatest accomplishment, yet the checks and balances placed between the lines of freedom are not defined. Obscenity speeches are defined as outside the boundaries of the First Amendment protection. Libel and Slander of public figures must be proven by malice; the reckless disregard for the truth. Commercial speeches can be banned by the government as illegal if the information if deceptive to the readers. The restrictions of freedom may possibly cause happier citizens, based on the truth that America still has more liberties than other countries. Citizens allow exceptions to the government as long as they are still given the right of having people’s opinions expressed if their views are warranted. The purpose of having rules in a free enterprise system is nothing more than to create guidelines to follow for higher standards of living that allows the people the ability of express themselves in a wide variety of ways.

The First Amendment does not protect the state or quality of being indecent, immoral, and vulgar. Being obscene is strongly offending the morality or personal rights others have as members of society. "Federal law prohibits the use of misleading domain names, words, or digital images on the Internet with intent to deceive viewers into viewing harmful or obscene material Miller vs. California"(Citizen's Guide to U.S. Federal Law on Obscenity). While it is true that the morality of another person should not be violated there should be an acceptation or group of words that should be permitted to be offensive. This word should be known to everyone and accepted as fighting. These words should indicate a willingness to fight or challenge someone with a vocabulary that expresses an insult, without jeopardizing an ethnic, racial, or sexist nature.

Some readers may challenge views that the government has too much power. After all, many believe that the government has the ability to write the rules itself. In multiple courts it has been ruled unconstitutional for the government to compel individuals to speak messages on its behalf. "In a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States holding that the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution protects students from being forced to salute the American flag and say the Pledge of Allegiance in school (West Virginia State Board of Education v.