Medical Marijuana Persuasive Analysis

In an article” Should Medical Marijuana be legal in Florida?” Professor J.J Colagrande, argues the state of Florida should pass a bill to legalize marijuana. Colagrande writes on how beneficial legalizing marijuana will be to the people of the state of Florida, and he is claiming that marijuana has never killed anyone. In addition Cologrande is using compassionate tone in this paragraph by saying “You’d have to be inhumane to not have empathy for people battling severe diseases, like epilepsy or cancer “(Cologrande). This example is expressing an emotion and creates a sad feeling towards the audience to vote for the bill to pass. It is clear that Professor Colagrande is 100% in favor of legalizing marijuana. The author gives us many reasons

Furthermore, he believes that “people who are with severe diseases like epilepsy, or cancer. “ They will benefit from it so it is not fair to restrain marijuana from them, because it helps them to get through things. He uses compassionate tone so that the audience would pay more their attention on voting for marijuana. These expressions create emotional awareness especially to the people who use marijuana. The issue here is to legalizing medical marijuana. The author state that “if people require marijuana as only means necessary to ease their pain they should absolutely be afforded that option.” This states that marijuana should be legal for people with severe diseases. As long as this drug does not lead anyone to death and doctors agree with it, then there is no reason why it should not be

Cologrande mostly supports his ideas by using logos appeal and logical tone. These are some facts that he is trying to appeal to audience by using the logical tone, and he says “the government should control what we put into our own bodies, especially in the privacy of our homes.” This shows how people have the right to do whatever they want with their own bodies; therefore marijuana being legal should not be a problem because it’s a personal choice. The author disagrees with the current laws in place about marijuana. He supports his ideas by using pathos appeal and emotion tone. They’re too harsh for the people and to let the bill pass. This article explains that author disagrees with the current laws in place about marijuana, and he feels sad that the government is still resisting about passing the law. The author offers a few counter arguments, and he states that “there isn 't a state in the union with more fly-by-neither, get-rich-quick reprobates, scallywags, and peddlers of fraud, abuse and mismanagement” (Colagrande). This is to say how Florida is very dangerous and people are involved in a lot of illegal activities, but either way they still have access to marijuana and passing this law would be a step towards decriminalization. It is disappoint thing to see something which is wrong but people can’t see it because of their own advantages, and it is very