Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Controversy of euthanasia
Controversy of euthanasia
Debate against euthanasia
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Controversy of euthanasia
Madison Bowdish Mrs. Clark CP English 10 4 April 2014 Their Choice He died in 2012, six days after a high panel of judges in England denied him his request for help in ending his life. Tony Nicklinson, a fifty-eight year old man suffered from locked-in syndrome, where people lose motor function but are still awake and aware. He was depressed and angered about having everyone do everything for him and not having the ability to speak (Burns). What would you choose: a slow degrading demise like Tony or ending on your own terms with dignity? Preferably leaving this world with self-respect. Euthanasia hails from the Greek word meaning “good death,” but the explanation of the word is ‘the act or practice of killing someone who is very sick or injured in order to prevent anymore suffering’ (“Facts”). It is crucial for people to have their own decision about life or death. Euthanasia needs to be legalized. Indeed euthanasia, or physician assisted suicide, is legal in four states. Oregon was the first to legalize it on November 8th, 1994 by a 51% majority vote. Following that was Washington on November 4th, 2008 with a 58% majority vote, Montana on December 31st, 2009 by a 5-4 vote, and more recently Vermont on May 20th, 2013 with Act 39. All of these states have the same requirements. …show more content…
In most countries, there is a shortage of health resources. So, if we allowed people to use euthanasia, it would open up valuable resources. Some patients who are ill and could be salvaged are not able to get quick access to the facilities they need for treatment. While at the same time, incurable people who would prefer not to keep living are using scarce health resources. Having the option of euthanasia to these people would open up health resources to people who actually wish to live (BBC “in favor”). We need to legalize euthanasia so both patient and economy can
Overall there are few positives for why euthanasia should be legal. With all the complications that could arise with euthanasia being legalized, it’d be nearly impossible for it to be an act for the better. Yes, it could help the terminally ill, but there are also many downfalls. Terminally ill have other options for the end of their life. In the future if euthanasia doesn’t legalize, improvements in other options could be made.
Euthanasia is a situation that a lot of people would not want to go through, or experience someone else go through, but sometimes people feel like it is the right thing to do. Many people agree that euthanasia is appropriate because leaving a patient who is going to die anyways in a hospital room surviving on artificial life support or artificial feeding tubes is just taking up space. Pulling the plug gets it over and it is just going to fast forward to what is going to happen anyways. If people actually come to think of it though, Euthanasia is not a practice that should be legalized because it is cruel. Euthanasia is morally incorrect; it can be compared to the murder of another human.
Withholding a person’s right to death is like withholding their right to life. It not only violates our constitution, and our liberties it violates the most fundamental ideas of what freedom from oppression means. 238 years ago when the United States declared independence the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness were guaranteed in the opening lines. Although those ideas have rarely been true for everyone throughout history regardless of ethnicity, color or creed they have been an ideal that was strived for by those who worked to increase our liberties. These ideas have guided us out of oppression and into a freer, better world. It is time to continue embracing them, by legalizing euthanasia.
Euthanasia is a painless killing for people who suffer from a painful disease. People who are ill should have the right to commit suicide. Everyone should have their own option to end their lives because they’re the one who knows how much they could stand. An addition, people who are assisted by a doctor in ending their lives with medical treatment should have that legally available to them. Needless suffering will continue in the US if the laws are not changed to reflect the current changes in medical care.
What is euthanasia? The word euthanasia comes from Greek words. “eu” means good and “thanatos” means death. When these two words are put together, it means “good death”. However, in the dictionary, the meaning of euthanasia is “the act or practice of killing or permitting the death of a hopelessly sick or injured individual in a relatively painless way for reasons of mercy”. Although this definition is meant to indicate euthanasia, it may give people a negative idea about euthanasia. Most people who choose to have euthanasia are patients with incurable or painful diseases such as cancer or Hepatitis B. These people go through a lot of pain every day; so don’t they have the right to choose death over going through a life of both physical and mental suffering? Euthanasia gives people with diseases like such, to have a good death without going through the suffering and pain. Yet, euthanasia is only legal in four countries and 3 out of 50 of the states in America. Many
Euthanasia should be illegal because it creates too many risks and is morally wrong. Four of the main risks euthanasia would bring about if it were legalized fall under what experts call "involuntary euthanasia." The first one is "crypthanasia." This is when people are treated with euthanasia against their will. The second form of involuntary euthanasia is "encouraged" euthanasia where a patient may be encouraged or pressured into turning to euthanasia in order to spare their family from financial and emotional difficulties. The third is "surrogate" euthanasia. This "might permit euthanizing incompetent patients on the basis of 'substituted judgement' or nebulous tests of 'burdens and benefits'." Finally there is the risk of "discriminatory" euthanasia. This is the belief that "in a society in which discrimination is common and many citizens do not have access even to basic health care, the legalization of euthanasia would create another powerful tool with which to discriminate against groups, whose 'consent' is already susceptible to coercion and whose rights are already in jeopardy.
Several hospitals mostly in third world countries run out of hospital space and equipment very fast. When there are individuals who are ill and can be cured they are not getting speedy access to resources because health care equipment are being used on patients who have no chance to live. Which is ineludibile if this patient wants to stay alive longer, but recurrently that is not the case. Around the world there are many cases where patients want to perform euthanasia but their wish is not being granted. I think that making the patient live longer is unintelligent as not only would it benefit the patient, it will free up valuable resources that can be used to treat patients who actually want to live. Euthanasia is again extremely beneficial to the health care system and will save the lives of patients who want to be
The technical definition of euthanasia is the act of ending life painlessly, often someone suffering from an incurable illness. However it is impossible for any life to end free from pain. The actual killing may be peaceful, but the suffering endured throughout the disease will never be forgotten and the heartbreak felt by the family due to the untimely death of a loved one will live on forever. Euthanasia is an extremely controversial issue dividing professionals in both the medical and legal fields. Some argue that individuals have a right to die and death is a choice. Those against euthanasia argue that, “Death occurs because a fatal pathological condition is allowed to take its natural course, not because those who have removed life support intended to kill the patient. Rather, their intention is to stop doing something useless or to stop imposing a burden on the patient.” (Yount 23)
Euthanasia taps into many controversial motives such as government, religion, ethics, and human rights. It is a very challenging issue to fully understand because of the different stances that can be taken on the subject. Euthanasia is the act of ending a person’s life by either lethal injection or the postponement of medical treatment. It is a way of allowing an ill patient to die with dignity. The debate of whether or not euthanasia should be legalized has gone on for many years. If a person is terminally ill, they should have the right to choose to die if they do not want to suffer any longer than they feel necessary. Society is split on whether it should be legalized due to more of the morality of the situation. Is it morally and ethically right to euthanize a person that still has a little more life to live? Should euthanasia be legalized to allow patients to have options of how to deal with their situation? Most people are open-minded to the thought of saving a terminally ill patient from suffering any more than they have already. Then there are those such as religious leaders, politicians, and doctors who are reluctant with the idea of allowing a very sick person to die without trying other treatments and methods first. Patients should have the right to choose to either fight their illness or die with dignity. Legalization of euthanasia will allow patients their right to control their life and make their own choices.
For those of you that do not know, euthanasia is the act of deliberately ending someone’s life to relieve them from suffering. Coming from the Greek words ‘eu’ meaning good and ‘thanatos’ meaning death, oppositions to euthanasia sometimes misinterpret the concept of euthanasia and distinguish it as an escape to killing someone against their will. In no way is euthanasia an act to purposely kill, but instead the decision to accelerate the death of patients in an incurable condition. As human beings we are said to live in a democratic society where we are free to make decisions. Decisions of where we live, decisions of what we look like and decisions of what we say, however living a life of anguish, adversity and agony is a decision no one ever wants to make. Society should have compassion and respect to an individual’s decision whose life has become unbearable, and are we really living in a free country if we cannot even have the choice to live or not live our own lives. What is one day you found yourself terminally ill, in excruciating pain and no longer wishing to waste yo...
Lastly, I support the idea of legalizing euthanasia because the patients own their bodies, and they can do anything with it. Even though the doctor is the one who put the patient to death in a process of euthanasia, the patient is the one who makes the decision to be “killed”, and therefore, euthanasia is a type of physician-assisted suicide, which is not any of other people business.
Euthanasia is a controversial issue because of the many ethical issues involved. Although, it can provide relief to suffering humans, but the moral standards are stretches for some because they are killing a human being. The proof for why euthanasia should or should not be used came from euthanasia books, that have both a pro and con section to the book. The other information came from euthanasia awareness websites. It could also be an economical way to save families and the government money, because euthanasia is cheaper than long term care. Therefore, euthanasia should be used because it could provide relief to the suffering person and their family.
Death. Disease. Fear. This is the recipe for euthanasia – the quick and painless answer to an incurable and suffering disease. Euthanasia, and a common form of euthanasia, assisted suicide, should be legal processes through which terminally-ill patients may voluntarily end his or her own life. Essentially, euthanasia is having a patient sign a waiver agreeing to allow a doctor inject them with toxic fluids that will end suffering and allow people to have a dignified quiet death. This suicidal method is meant only for patients with terminal illnesses. That is, diseases that will eventually kill you, or that cause terrific pain and suffering without killing you anytime soon. Euthanasia has been an extremely controversial topic over the
Euthanasia is considered to be a solution to suffering people when diseases and terminal conditions effect their daily functioning. Although assisted suicide is only legal in three states, some people believe that we should allow people with terminal illnesses the right to die in every state (Newton, 2013). The main reason people find that euthanasia is a good idea is because it allows people a simple death. With the use of euthanasia, the person experiences a fast and painless death unlike the painful life they have to live otherwise (Walter, 2013). As humans, we want to live a happy and healthy life. With a terminal illness people just want their pain to end, whether that be with death or by getting better. The reality of the situation is that they will not get better and just spend their days in pain until they die. By legalizing euthanasia, it gives the people an alternative when they are sick of the suffering.
Even though people are not in control of how they are born, they are in control as to how they will pass away. In other words, each individual has the right to control his or her body in whatever way he or she wants. Behind this ideology lies the idea that humans should also have the right to determine in what way and by whose hand he or she will die and gives rise the controversial issue of legalizing euthanasia. Even though some people argue that euthanasia gives too much power to doctors and state that alternatives exist, individuals who are in suffering should be given the choice to end their pain. With proper regulation, euthanasia should be legalized because adults have the right to terminate their lives.