Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
euthanasia and why it should be legalized
should euthanasia be legal
should euthanasia be legal
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: euthanasia and why it should be legalized
Euthanasia A terminal disease can take a toll on a person physically, mentally, and emotionally. Sometimes a disease can eat and eat at someone until they are tired of it and just want it to end. Euthanasia is a way that the pain and suffering can end for these miserable people. Euthanasia is assisted suicide by a doctor for people that have a terminal disease. Euthanasia could help a lot of people end their suffering and pain, but euthanasia is only legal in a few places. Euthanasia should be legal because it will save money for the economy, the alternatives are horrifying, it improves the quality of life and can be properly regulated. Euthanasia would not only save individuals and families a ton of money but also would save the economy …show more content…
Sprague said that the easiest way to save billions of dollars and not affect the heath care quality is legalizing euthanasia. There are always those miracle stories of people beating terminal illnesses but many don’t beat them. By letting these people not put their families and hospitals in debt and letting them die in a peaceful way should be legal. With euthanasia helping out people and the government financially, it will also help the person with the terminal disease. A terminal disease is a hard thing for a person to go through because of the fact that they have that constant pain and thought of knowing they can die at any time. The pain that these people go through emotionally and physically sometimes can be intolerable. People with cancer with pain due to infiltration on extremely sensitive nerves can feel like a dental drill on an unanaesthetised tooth nerve. (“Euthanasia Relieves Suffering”) Pain that is caused by cancer cannot always be …show more content…
The biggest and most important oath that a doctor takes is “first, do not harm” so if the doctor administers this drug then they would be going against what they said and believed in as a doctor. The New York State Task Force on Life and the Law stated: "Many physicians and others who oppose assisted suicide and euthanasia believe that the practices undermine the integrity of medicine and the patient-physician relation-ship. (Stevens)The reason most people become doctors are to help people and save lives, not take them. Many doctors that have been involved with euthanasia have been affected emotionally and psychologically. Dutch physician who performed euthanasia noted that: 'To kill someone is something far reaching and that is something that nags at your conscience. . . . I wonder what it would be like not to have these cases in my practice. Perhaps I would be a much more cheerful person.’” (Stevens) Most doctors say that after they have done euthanasia that they wish they wouldn’t have or they say that they will never do it again. Doctors seeing patients in pain and suffering might also distort their judgment on whether they should be euthanized or
Anyone can be diagnosed with a terminal illness. It doesn’t matter how healthy you are, who you are, or what you do. Some terminal illnesses you can prevent by avoiding unhealthy habits, eating healthily, exercising regularly and keeping up with vaccinations. However some terminally ill people cannot be helped, their diseases cannot be cured and the only thing possible to help them, besides providing pain relieving medication, is to make them as comfortable as possible while enduring their condition. Many times the pharmaceuticals do not provide the desired pain escape, and cause patients to seek immediate relief in methods such as euthanasia. Euthanasia is the practice of deliberately ending a life in order to alleviate pain and suffering, but is deemed controversial because many various religions believe that their creators are the only ones that should decide when their life’s journey should reach its end. Euthanasia is performed by medical doctors or physicians and is the administration of a fatal dose of a suitable drug to the patient on his or her express request. Although the majority of American states oppose euthanasia, the practice would result in more good as opposed to harm. The patient who is receiving the euthanizing medication would be able to proactively choose their pursuit of happiness, alleviate themselves from all of the built up pain and suffering, relieve the burden they may feel they are upon their family, and die with dignity, which is the most ethical option for vegetative state and terminally ill patients. Euthanasia should remain an alternative to living a slow and painful life for those who are terminally ill, in a vegetative state or would like to end their life with dignity. In addition, t...
People who are depressed, terminally ill, and anyway people are going to eventually commit suicide might as well do euthanasia so the police don’t have to get involved in a suicide case. This would benefit ethically but also make people’s lives easier. According to the National Library of Medicine and the National Health Institute, anyone needs a written consent before doing so. This is so family members aren’t doing it to harm someone or make sure they really want to go with it.
Everyone should have a choice as to how and when they would like to end their lives. Terminally ill patients should not have to suffer for the rest of their lives, especially when the doctor deems that there is no hope left for them getting any better. Euthanasia should be offered to terminally ill patients. Euthanasia is killing someone who has no hope in living in a painless way. Terminal is death that will occur eventually. Terminal can also be having a illness that cannot be cured, that leads to death.
Death is something almost everyone fears, but the people that aren’t afraid are the ones suffering from terminal disease and other life-threatening illness. Euthanasia and physician assisted suicide are very serious topics in the medical community, as supporters to legalization argue that it’s the right of the person to live or die, while on the other side opponents argue legalizing it me1ans that doctors will have the ability to kill patients and that the government approves it. Euthanasia is legal in multiple countries including Netherlands, Switzerland, and Canada. Physician assisted suicide is legal in a lot of countries including; Germany, Japan, and Switzerland. Euthanasia is widely conversed in the world and has been since it was first
As Dave Anderson said, “it can be as savage as a freak accident or as simple as falling down the stairs to put you in a world of excruciating pain”. Although, no one ever wanted to wish for it, for those who had an unfortunate condition of being diagnosed with incurable disease must have a choice out of it. Beyond the implication of human’s right to live or die, he or she may decide on euthanasia because no one wants to suffer from pain. Not only suffering from the illness but the patient and family member also suffering from crippling debt that often can be brutal and expensive; letting patients went through a long torment just to give them extra days or months. The upshot of this are expensive treatments that the patient has constantly demanded that they rather die. In fact, euthanasia facilitates the patient and the family member to lead the quality of life before death comes to visit. Regardless of the consequence, no one can interfere the patient’s right to free
This pain then makes their physical appearance change, and sometimes unrecognizable. Euthanasia should be legalized; it is very hard on the body to go through this slow and painful journey that leads to death. According to Listverse, “Death is usually slow, painful, and undignified. By refusing people the “right” to end their own lives, we’re increasing that pain and indignity to a horrifying extent.” This quote shows how much pain and distress the patient is feeling, making it hard for them to live an enjoyable and fulfilled life. The legalization of euthanasia would prevent this, making a more humane death for the
Envision being diagnosed with end stage cancer. You are only given a few months remaining to live. Your doctor informs you of all the frightening and painful experiences lying ahead of you. As your health beings to deteriorate, your family no longer recognizes the person that you once were. Would you choose the path to suffering tremendous amounts of pain, or would you want to die peacefully? Euthanasia is an assisted death option for those who are diagnosed with an incurable disease. It is the permissive right of voluntary suicide, to prevent those who are terminally ill from suffering in vain. Some terminally ill patients suffer a great deal of pain, and do not wish to prolong their suffering. Euthanasia ensures that a person with a degenerative disease can end their own life with the assistance of the medical community.
In the world, 7.2 to 7.5 million people die from terminal illnesses each year (“We've Got Answers.”)Euthanasia, the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease or in an irreversible coma, would end suffering. Euthanasia is illegal in most parts of the world but in the Netherlands it accounts for about one in 30 deaths. Even though many people find euthanasia unethical, it can be used to end the increase of medical bills after the patient passes, patients have the right to decide when they die, and it ends the suffering of the patient.
Once people decide to end their lives they give up. They give up on fighting for themselves and others that love them. At times they may not even be in the right state of mind when they make these decisions. When people know that they have a terminal illness they tend to go through depression. They think that they have nothing else to live for, but it is just a stage that they are going through. There are certain factors that are dangerous and lead people to end their lives. There are people that want euthanasia to be legalized but they do not understand the consequences that come with that legalization. Once euthanasia is legalized vulnerable patients could be talked into suicide and doctors could take that decision for them. Euthanasia should not be an easy way out to get rid of a patient’s pain.
In review, euthanasia is performed when the pain is too much for the patient. It is, overall, the patient’s life—their right and their choice. Everyone deserves to die compassionately, knowing that they will slip away painlessly. Everyone deserves to have a choice, especially when it comes to the manner of their death. If euthanasia is not legalized, many people will debilitating illnesses may take their lives in much more horrific ways. If they want the suffering to end badly enough, it is simply done one way or
There are two cases of euthanasia, voluntary and involuntary. Voluntary euthanasia is conducted with consent from the patient while involuntary euthanasia is conducted without consent, but the decision is made by a close relation to the patient because of incapability on the patient part. Also euthanasia has two procedural classifications, passive and active. Passive euthanasia involves withdrawal of life-prolonging treatments, whereas active euthanasia as well-known as mercy killing involves the use of force or lethal substance are used to end a patient’s life. Active euthanasia include life-ending actions conducted by the patient or somebody else. In short: euthanasia involves killing the patient to eliminate the pain while end-of-life care involves eliminating the pain so that the patient can die painlessly, from natural causes. Euthanasia is very controversial in the sense, many argued that it is assisted suicide and could be a cover for outright murder. Others have also argue that, in hastening the dying process of a patient is not apparently the way to relieve suffering. In contrast, regardless of a patient’s medical condition, euthanasia is against medical ethics, is against most religions, and it is not the ultimate answer to end suffering patients. Physicians and doctors have a code of ethics that’s guide their practices. Euthanasia is a direct violation of the medical oath which states that Physician-assisted suicide, like eu...
Death is final. Some die naturally in a peaceful manner while others suffer through tremendous pain in order to get there. Euthanasia is the only way for some people to leave all their pain behind. Euthanasia is the act of killing another person in a merciful way. Of course, euthanasia has many more meaning to it than that. A person that is suffering from a terminal illness decides that life is not worth living because there is too much pain involved and ends his own life, would that be wrong of him? That is the question that is at hand.
Euthanasia is clearly a mercy for those who suffer immensely through disease. Euthanasia should be an option for those that want it. It is obvious that many will still have objections and many will not make such a choice, but if they so choose, a quick and easy death awaits. I personally am not against euthanasia.
First of all, euthanasia saves money and resources. The amount of money for health care in each country, and the number of beds and doctors in each hospital are limited. It is a huge waste if we use those money and resources to lengthen the lives of those who have an incurable disease and want to die themselves rather than saving the lives of the ones with a curable ailment. When we put those patients who ask for euthanasia to death, then the waiting list for each hospital will shorten. Then, the health care money of each country, the hospital beds, and the energy of the doctors can be used on the ones who can be cured, and can get back to normal and able to continue contributing to the society. Isn’t this a better way of using money and resources rather than unnaturally extend those incurable people’s lives?
One bad consequence that some anticipate is that active euthanasia would weaken society's commitment to providing optimal care for dying patients. Today, our health care system is largely focused on medical costs and if patients are able to afford it or not. “Euthanasia is…a very cheap service. The cost of a dose of barbiturates and curare and the few hours in a hospital bed that it takes them to act is minute compared to the massive bills incurred by many patients in the last weeks and months of their lives” (Potts 81). If euthanasia appears to be a cheaper method than providing hospice care would this potentially have a negative effect on how patients who do not chose euthanasia are treated? This is an answer we do not know for certain but it should not be disregarded. Additionally, legalizing euthanasia would also diminish all hope. Most people have heard of a miracle story about a patient who had a limited amount of time left to live and made a shocking recovery. These doctors who made the prognosis of patients whom have made a shocking recovery against all odds “... [experience] the wonderful embarrassment of being proven wrong in his or her pessimistic prognosis. To make euthanasia a legitimate option as soon as the prognosis is pessimistic enough is to reduce the probability of such extraordinary recoveries from low to zero” (Potts 79).