Multibillion-dollar research corporations use more than 100 million animals every year for human purposes. It is not just the multibillion-dollar research companies that are experimenting with animals; the government both requires and regulates animal testing. Animals are used for cosmetics, basic research, genetic modification, and to find cures and treatments. Any time a new drug is developed, it needs to be tested on two different species of animals; one of those animals cannot be a rodent. Animals are also used to test theories and principles, or just to gain knowledge (Animals in Science). There is a law that protects most animals, but it should be intensified so that there are more regulations or banning animal testing all together. Banning …show more content…
Animals are modeled for practically everything that is medically wrong with humans. They are used to research human diseases and develop a drug to treat or cure it. Animals used in psychological research are used in experiments such as addiction and different types of deprivation. They are also used for military purposes, like the development of weapons or distinctive types of explorations (Animals in Science). Many scientists believe that animal testing is the best way to find answers to many questions. Approximately 70% of scientists, who responded, said that they do conduct experiments on animals. Approximately 63% of respondents say that they strongly agree that animal research is essential to the advancement of biomedical science. Many scientists would rather use a replacement than an animal (Cressey). When studying and coming up with a treatment for neurological diseases, there are no alternatives. Scientists should take into consideration that animals and humans have different framework (Burrell). Also, those animals do not have any communication skills to let anyone know when they are in pain or how what they are …show more content…
Since the drugs fail the test, they are not tested on humans. The reason the drug fails because humans and animals have a different anatomy, physiology, and metabolism. Drugs will have different reactions to different species. For instance, penicillin is toxic in guinea pigs, but essential in human medicine (Animal Studies Do Not Reliably Predict Human Outcomes). Approximately 90% of drug trials fail. Treatments seem promising after an animal experiment. Then during the clinical trial, the drug would not test the same thing in humans. Most of the time the trial fails (Burrell). “Researchers at Vanderbilt Medical Center explain in their article “the phenotypes studied in animals are not truly identical to human disease, but are limited representations of them”” (“Animal Studies Do Not Reliably Predict Human Outcomes”). It is fact that humans and animals are different. Humans and most of the animals that are mainly used when experimenting on, share about to over 90% of DNA. Humans and chimpanzees share about 98.8% of DNA, while humans and monkeys share only 93% of DNA. Humans and mice share about 90% of DNA (Garrett-Hatfield). Humans and animals are not a perfect match; the only match that is closest to a human is another human. Although there is animal testing, there are laws to protect animals. These laws are there to make sure that the animals are not mistreated and
Animals are used as a part of experimentations in order to accomplish new openings. A few individuals think that it is satisfactory, while others contend that it is not moral to sacrifice animals for science. Estimated, that fifty to one hundred million of animals are used for tests in the world. Despite the significance of experiments, the quantity of animals and purpose of research are not under any control. Animals testing should be banned under a few circumstances; we can enhance the situation by using alternative ways such as replacement, reduction, and refinement according to International Society for Applied Ethology.
College instills attitudes, skills and other characteristics that make college graduates different from those who do not go on to college. It will help the student develop skills specific to their career path and crucial for future job success
Each year, millions of animals, ranging from mice to monkeys, suffer through the cruel and inhumane practice of animal testing. Scientist throughout the world are torturing animals for mankind’s own benefit, which is unreliable in most cases. “According to Humane Society International, animals that are used in experiments are commonly subjected to force feeding, forced inhalation, food and water deprivation, prolonged periods of physical restraint, the infliction of burns and other wounds to study the healing processes and the infliction of pain to study its effects and remedies.” Although humans often benefit from successful animal research, these animals do not have a voice to say no. The pain, suffering, and deaths inflicted on these animals are not worth the possible human benefits. Scientist test the animals for many products that we humans can use (makeup, medicine, etc.). Many of the items we purchase on a regular basis have been tested on animals first. Most of the animal testing is unreliable.
Testing on animals cannot accurately predict what will work in humans. Medical breakthroughs have, in fact, happened without the use of animal testing. For every 5,000 tests used in labs, only a handful are ever deemed to be safe enough to be used in humans. Of the few that
Since ancient times, animals have been the subjects of medical and safety testing. But only relatively recently has discontent been expressed by large numbers of people. Referred to as animal rights activists, this displeasured community condemns all animal use in medical, product testing, and research experiments despite the beneficiary outcomes because they firmly believe that interfering with another living creature’s life is immorally and ethically wrong. One individual who sides with the activists is named Jamie Aronson. Having earned a Ph.D from the University of Massachusetts located in Boston, Aronson affirms that “animals do not have a voice in our society.” Opposing Aronson is the duo of Patricia George and professor of State University
Live mammals make up the majority of testing for medicine. This is because of the simple fact that nothing compares to testing on living, breathing organisms. The inner workings of a rat and human are similar in all ways that matter, so they are used to demonstrate how drugs affect the body. One huge reason to test these drugs on living things is to detect if these drugs actually do work in the organism, and how soon it shows symptoms of getting back to better health. Also, with symptoms, we are also able to
Is animal testing really worth taking away animal’s valuable lives? No, I think it’s wrong, inhumane, and cruel. Animals have feelings like humans do and they should be treated with respect even though they are just animals.When animals are tested over time they live in cruel and harsh conditions. They are tied up and changed to their cages or devices they are being tested on. Almost all tests fail in humans and it is not worth sacrificing an animals life.Think about all the things animals have to go through all the harsh and cruel treatment.They are put in conditions where they are not allowed to eat or drink and move around. Is it really worth killing an animals for eyeliner that will never hit the market or for drugs that all fail in humans. So here are some of the reasons I think we should ban all animal testing.
The term animal testing refers to procedures performed on living animals for purposes of research. The testing is used to research basic biology and diseases, to evaluate the efficiency of new medicinal products, and test the human health and environmental safety of consumer and industry products such as cosmetics, household cleaners, food additives, pharmaceuticals and industrial chemicals. All procedures, even those classified as “mild,” have the potential to cause the animals physical as well as psychological distress and suffering. Often the procedures can cause a great deal of suffering. Most animals are killed at the end of an experiment, but some may be reused in subsequent experiments (Humane Society, 2016). Animal testing is by no
For many years, animal testing has been the main solution to test household products, food, chemicals, and pharmaceuticals. The term “animal testing” refers to the procedure performed on certain animals to determine if a certain product is safe. Most of these procedures done on the animal can cause a great amount of physical pain, and distress. Most animals die shortly after the experiment because so much pain was inflicted on their body. After the testing is done, the animals are left to suffer in cages. The different types of experiments performed on the animals are outrageous. There is even an alternative to animal testing, but scientist refuse to use it, and some people wonder if animals are even needed for medical research.
For thousands of years, animals have been used to test procedure, vaccines, and medicine to see their reaction prior to using them on humans. This allows these medicines, vaccines, and procedures to be reviewed and accepted by government before making them available to the public. Many medicines have potentially harmful side effects and testing on animals allows scientists to identify these side effects and let the consumer know prior to receiving and taking the medication. During this testing process, many animals react poorly to some medications or vaccines and doctors realize that those will not work for humans. This saves the loss of human life and sickness but what about the animals? It is estimated that 26 million animals are used to test in every year in the United States alone (ProCon). All sorts of animals are used to test from chickens to chimpanzees. Chimpanzees are often used due to the similarity of their DNA to human DNA. It is believed that humans developed from chimpanzee like animals over millions of years. Some animals experience the harmful effects of these tests and many die from them. Animals do not have the ability to consent to these types
For centuries, the use of animal experimentation in the biomedical field has been questioned ethically. Do the benefits of animals used in research outweigh the pain that the animals endure? Animal rights activists will argue that there are new alternatives that are more accurate than animal testing. Nonetheless, scientists will continue to use animals for the advancement in the medical field because there have been various cases where animals have paved the way, medically, for humans to this day. Additionally, testing on animals instead of humans puts humans out of harms way. The first Animal Cruelty Act was created in 1835 to regulate the use of animals for scientific purposes. According to Franco (2013), the “Enactment of the 1986 Animals
Not only do we have other options for these tests, but animals testing has actually been proven to be ineffective. Companies claim that this sort of cruelty will benefit the human population by testing the “safety” of the products, as they have been for hundreds of years and although this may have been helpful in the past, scientists have discovered otherwise. “While funding for animal experimentation and the number of animals tested on continues to increase, the United States still ranks 49th in the world in life expectancy and second worst in infant mortality in the developed world” (“Animal Testing Is”). This evidence shows that while we still continue to support and spend money on animal testing, it is not working as well as we thought.Essentially we are torturing the animals for a negative outcome, both for the human and the animal. The Food and Drug Administration reports that “92 out of every 100 drugs that pass animal tests fail in humans” (“Top Five Reasons”). If the products and drugs that we are testing on the animals are not working then there is no use in harming a harmless animal for them. Some may disagree and say that animal testing has enabled us to develop many life saving treatments for both humans and animals. But in reality there has been more cons then pros in animal testing. For example, “Animal tests on the arthritis drug Vioxx showed that it had a protective effect on the hearts of mice, yet the drug went on to cause more than 27,000 heart attacks and sudden cardiac deaths before being pulled from the market” (Should Animals Be). While animal testing has enabled us to create great products it is usually ineffective on humans and leads to animals being harmed for no
Animals have held an important spot in many of our lives. Some people look at animals as companions and others see them as a means of experimental research and medical advancement. With the interest to gain knowledge, physicians have dissected animals. The ethics of animal testing have always been questioned because humans do not want to think of animals on the same level as humans. Incapable of our thinking and unable to speak, animals do not deserve to be tested on by products and be conducted in experiments for our scientific improvement. Experimentation on animals is cruel, unfair, and does not have enough beneficial results to consider it essential.
Hundreds of millions of animals die every year from animal testing in the United States. Innocent animals are used everyday in laboratories for biology advancements, medical training, curiosity-driven experimentation, and chemical, drug, food, and cosmetic testing. They are used to provide information to make better products that are safe for human use. Although animal experimentation has some benefits, the negatives outweigh the positives. Animal testing is killing off innocent beings for the possible human benefit, and with modern technology, there are alternative ways to test products that leave animals unharmed.
A college education opens the door to gain knowledge that high school does not give you. In college students obtain the knowledge of how to become more independent. For example, the students learn to choose their own class schedule, extracurricular activities, and how to organize your time.