Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Benefits and challenges of teamwork
Benefits and challenges of teamwork
Benefits and challenges of teamwork
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Benefits and challenges of teamwork
The world ‘s economy has developed continuously throughout the decades. In order to catch up with the economic development and people demand, the business is always seeking for the best approaches to enhance productivity as well as performance of the company. “According to Mc Shane, Olekalns and Travaglione (2010), self-directed teams have a high degree of autonomy, which is proven to increase productivity”. Based on my experiences either in the course ‘s work group activities, I agree that self-directed team if implemented appropriately will lead to the high level of productivity. This essay will critically analyse the authors’ claim and examine whether or not self-directed teams are always beneficial for the business in many perspectives. Throughout the body of the essay, we will be looking at the self-directed team ‘s definition, advantages, and disadvantages, how it is reflected in the real work group meetings and some solutions.
According to Mc Shane, Olekalns and Travaglione (2010), A Self-directed team, also known as a self-managing team is defined as a “cross functional work group” which each team member is responsible for a small specific task but interdependent to each other’s in working processes to accomplish “an entire piece of work” with a high level of independence. In other words, Wood, Wallace, Zeffane, Schermerhorn, Hunt, and Osborn (2001) also define self-directed teams are the groups of people that have an authority in managing and evaluating their work with a very minimum supervision to solve day-to-day issues.
Self-directed teams have proven its vital role in business organizations and workplaces by many advantages.
First of all, the employees’ motivation and satisfaction are improved significantly, whic...
... middle of paper ...
... Database.
Halkos, G & Bousinakis, D 2010, ‘The effect of stress and satisfaction on productivity’, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, vol. 59, Issue 5, pp. 415-431.
Mc Shane, S, Olekalns, M & Travaglione, T 2010, Organisational behaviour on the Pacific Rim, 3rd edn, Mc Graw Hill, Australia, pp. 320.
Singer, J & Duvall, S 2000, ‘High-performance partnering by self-managed teams in manufacturing’,: Engineering Management Journal, vol. 12, Issue 4, pp.9-15, viewed on 5 April 2011, ProQuest Database.
Williams, R 1995, Self-Directed Work Teams: A Competitive Advantage, post November 1995, viewed 3 April 2011, http://www.qualitydigest.com/nov95/html/self-dir.html
Wood, Wallace, Zeffane, Schermehorn, Hunt, Osborn 2001, Organisational behaviuor: global perspective, 2rd edn, John Wiley & Sons Australia Ltd, Australia, pp. 309-310.
Teams are groups of people who work together to achieve a common goal (Learning Team Handbook, p 310). Workplace teams are increasing as businesses find the yield of team productivity and creativity exceeds individual productivity/creativity. To promulgate productive teams, businesses have had to identify common threads for successful teams. Businesses have identified the dynamics and needs of successful teams.
Langton, Nancy, Stephen Robbins, and Timothy Judge.Organizational Behaviour: Concepts, Controversies, Applications. Fifth Canadian Edition. Toronto: Pearson Canada, 2009. 141, 574-84. Print.
Larson, C. and LaFasto, F. (1989), Teamwork: What Must Go Right/What Can Go Wrong. Newberry Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Singer, J., & Duvall, S. (2000). High-performance partnering by self-managed teams in manufacturing. Engineering Management Journal, 12(4), 9.
Stewart, G., Manz, C., & Sims, H., (1999). Teamwork and Group Dynamics. New York: Wiley. pp. 70- 125.
Bibliography Books Brooks, I. (2005) Organisational Behaviour, 3rd Ed, Great Britain, Pearson Education Mullins, L. (2007) Management and Organisational Behaviour, 8th Ed, Great Britain, FT Prentice Hall. Mullins, L. (2006) Essentials of Organisation Behaviour, Great Britain, FT Prentice Hall. E - journals Belbin, M. (2007) Managing through empowerment:
Ivancevich, John, Knopaske, Robert, Matteson, Michael, Organizational Behaviour and Management (10 edition (January 30, 2013). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Inc. Stephen P. Robbins, Timothy A. Judge. I am a judge. Organisational Behaviour, 6th edition. Pearson Australia.
The collection of ideas, knowledge, and experience of different individuals is better than that of only one person. From problem-solving to innovation, organizations have relied on the high-performances of groups and teams to set the organization apart from the rest. Having a common goal will make each team member accountable for the success and failure of the team. Since each team member is accountable to the team, each member's behavior will have an effect on the team. To belong to a team requires that each member be clear on the goals and objectives of the team-to share a common vision. (Park, 2005) By doing so, a group can become a high-performance team.
Self - managing teams – self-managing teams are the teams, which complete the work without any close supervision. All the member in the teams has the high degree of autonomy in how they will do the work which includes planning, developing scheduling the work and give the task team worker.
Morley, M., Moore, S., Heraty, N., Linehan, M. and Maccurtain, S. 2004. Principals of Organisational Behavior: An Irish Text. 2nd ed. Dublin: Gill and Macmillan.
Teams have been around for many years. It is vital for members who are a part of any team to work together so that their labor is not in vain. A major advantage for working cohesively as teams is greater output and interpersonal skills. The drawback of not working in uniformity can lead to project delays and time constraints. Organizations create teams with the purpose of fulfilling certain obligations and acquiring business success. Roming (1996) states that togetherness and dependability means that members within the team assist each other and the team. Which in turn, yields a better-quality product.
One definition of a team is "A small number of people with complementary skills who are committed to a common purpose, common performance goals, and approach for which they hold themselves mutually responsible"¨ (Moorhead & Griffin, 2001, p.604). Another definition is "A group of two or more entities linked by a common bond to foster the achievement of a common goal" (Chillis, 1999). Whichever definition is used it is understood that commonality is the guiding force for a successful team. With their purpose and goals defined and accepted the team becomes interdependent; they coordinate their various skills and abilities to direct themselves toward the desired result.
Stephen Robbins , (2010). Management and Organisational Behaviour. 9th ed. England: Financial Times Pitman Publishing.
Teamwork is becoming more important in the work place, because of the leaders and the fact that it allows full participation with all employees. In order to complete several different tasks, managers and supervisors usually perform teams and assign different tasks to complete one major assignment. Team work starts at the top (Smikle, 2009). When supervisors or managers are willing to administer teamwork, they are enabling the employees to follow. Managers or supervisors set good examples when they delegate tasks, but more importantly express to the employees how teamwork is productive. Employees work by example, more so now than by demands.