In recent years, many people in the United States have acquired an oddly tilted concept of how the judicial branch of government should function. Modern consensus postulates that the Supreme Court is the final arbiter of the Constitution, and that its judgments cannot be challenged or changed except through its own decision (Vieira). Curiously, however, this idea of giving the power of final constitutional interpretation to the judiciary—known in law as “judicial supremacy”—finds no basis in the text of the Constitution itself or in historical opinion. This doctrine is a modern construction, and it poses an unhappily real threat to individual liberties in America. The people of our nation deserve a judiciary that is just in its judgments, and this will not be found in a system acquiescent to judicial supremacy.
Before one can discuss the dangers of judicial supremacy, a short history of its development would be in order. Almost two hundred years ago, in 1820, Thomas Jefferson became one of the first persons to mention the danger posed by judicial overreach. In a letter to William Jarvis, he said that “You seem…to consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions; a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy. Our judges are as honest as other men, and not more so” (Jefferson). His sentiments were later echoed by another famous president, Abraham Lincoln. Under the shadow of the Dred Scott case, in which Lincoln had acted on his conscience and interpretation of the Constitution while disobeying a Supreme Court decision, the president expressed his own opinion on the power of America’s highest judicial body. “The candid citizen must confess,” Li...
... middle of paper ...
...azine. 11 December 2013.
Griswold v. Connecticut. 381 U.S. 479. Supreme Court of the United States. 1965. Justia US Supreme Court Center. Web. 11 December 2013.
Griswold v. Connecticut. The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. 11 December 2013. .
Jefferson, Thomas. The Writings of Thomas Jefferson. Washington, H. A. New York: H. W. Derby. 1861
Lincoln, Abraham. Lincoln’s First Inaugural Address. Independence Hall Association, Philadelphia. 10 December 2013
Vieira, Edwin. Dangers of “Judicial Supremacy.” 17 February 2009. The New American Magazine. 10 December 2013
In my essay I will address the question “Alexander Hamilton famously described the judiciary as the weakest branch of government. Do you agree with this statement in the context of the Irish constitution?” In my answer I will be engaging, critically, with the concept of the separation of powers and the manner in which the judiciary interacts with other organs of government, to do this I will be talking about three main topics, so I will split my essay into sections to separate them. In my first section
LAWS1206 ESSAY U5800382 INTRODUCTION Esteemed former Chief Justice, Sir Harry Gibbs, asserted that public confidence ‘in the judiciary can be maintained only if the judges are seen to be not only fully competent to perform their functions, but also independent, impartial and of complete integrity’ and thus, the best method of appointing Justices ought to be in place to fulfill these qualities and allow this confidence to thrive. Therefore, this essay will argue that the current method of appointment
coercive and psychological factors of interrogation. The paper provides a review of the current legal approaches to interrogation through the eyes of the judiciary and posits that the judiciary’s use of subjective solutions through charter exclusion is ineffective in managing police conduct in the interrogation room. The reluctance of the judiciary to alter or halt methodically coercive interrogations by the police leaves no alternative approach, but use of the objectivity of substantive law. The Interrogation
In the book Escaping Salem: The Other Witch Trial of 1692 by Richard Godbeer, the witch hunt that took place in Stamford, Connecticut, was not as infamous as the witch hunt of Salem both witch trials taken place during the year 1692. Godbeer explains what occurred during the witch trial in Stamford. During this time period most of the Puritan New Englanders accused women who would act different or didn’t seem to fit in, of being a witch. The point that Godbeer portrays is how in early America during
independence of the judiciary. Unhelpfully perhaps, at least in the context of the question posed in the title to this work, the 2005 Act does not provide a definition of the concept of the rule of law. As Lord Bingham observed in a 2006 lecture, the draughtsmen of the 2005 Act seemingly acknowledged the difficulty of establishing an accurate, comprehensive and succinct definition appropriate for incorporation in the statute, and so left the job of definition to the judiciary in their subsequent
Violence against women is both historic and universal matter of concern. It is historic, because gender inequality
society. [1]Our government is formed by the Constitution laid out by our fore fathers in the early eighteenth century. This document lays out the form of our three branched government system, consisting of the legislative, executive, and judiciary braches. The judiciary branch is shaped as a system of courts to judge citizens that have broken the rules that are set by the legislative branch. In the majority of these courtroom scenarios, lawyers are used to argue for both the defense and the prosecution
What is crime, and How new technology is changing the nature of criminal behavior and crime especially computer crime? I. What is Crime? Crime is an action or omission that constitutes an offence that may be prosecuted by the state and is punishable by law. New technologies are the objects that change the nature of criminal behavior and the crime, one of the main technologies that have been used widely for crime purposes is computer. This paper intends to look at computer crime, statistics about
can actually achieve it. Millions of immigrants make the journey to America every year seeking the possibility of a better life; with the right amount of dedication it is possible to achieve success. The American dream is still alive, society just has various interpretations of it. The American Dream can be accomplished with the right tools. In “The American Dream” by Martin C. Jischke he states,“ I represent just one of many millions of Americans whose lives and futures have been changed by the power
weeks of his arrival in Umuofia Mr. Smith suspended a young woman from the church for pouring new wine into old bottles. (184 – 185) In doing this, Mr. Smith showed the Ibo people that Christianity is a ... ... middle of paper ... ... Okonkwo is just another device used by Achebe in “Things Fall Apart” to compare and contrast the religions of Christianity and Animism. The religions have more differences then similarities and because of this, a war was initiated to dispute who had the better culture
Presidential power has always been controversial. Congress and the Judiciary have clashed with both Bush and Clinton administrations over matters of executive privilege, impeachment, and the war on terror. Almost all modern presidents have moved to expand their power. So it is an even bet that given the foreign policy challenges of Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran, and North Korea—not to mention the disruptions to the domestic economy of the credit crisis—Barack Obama will soon be drawing on the well of executive
demand for luxuries in sedentary society carries within it the germs of fragmentation, decay and, ultimately, collapse” (Alatas, 2017). In modern history during the 1990s following the collapse of the former Soviet Union, a strong emphasis has been emerged to consider classification of states with respect to various levels of their socio-economic and political progress, in which states are being categorized on a number of socio-economic and political variables into different groups such as strong
Congress was established to represent the people; to serve a purpose bigger than themselves. The delegates battled with each other all for the greater good. Their responsibility was to facilitate prosperity and to set up a safe and flourishing country for their eager citizens. Similarly, their duty is to serve the constituents and their country. This is done through extensive processes of legislation and investigations of national significance. To get the job done in Congress, it may not always
government was structured by the Articles of Confederation. They felt that the government was too weak to effectively deal with the upcoming challenges. In 1787, an agreement was made by delegates at the Constitutional Convention that a national judiciary needed to be established. This agreement became known as The Constitution of the United States, which explicitly granted certain powers to each of the three branches of the federal government, while reserving other powers exclusively to the states
redefinition of criminal justice by the Warren Court .The liberal interpretation of it by this court in turn became the target of a conservative attempt to diminish congressional power under the doctrine of “original intent” and to use the federal judiciary to return more authority to state and local government. At the beginni... ... middle of paper ... ...f Rights. The founding of an American constitutional republic in the eighteenth century with a federal system of democratic government attracts