However, it is essential to understand that people can make moral decisions without having a religion or being religious. Some people think that the religion is God-given and flexible for all times, but the other see it as traditions that change with time. Folkways can change to mores which are habits and traditions that are used to make moral judgments. Sumner believes that sometimes mores and folkways can be harmful and dangerous (24). Therefore, a person may think that what was right for ancestors may not be right these days now. Thus, most religions’ ...
... middle of paper ...
... values. It is essential to accept that holding a belief without any sufficient evidence doesn’t harm its holder only, but even the people around him because beliefs control our actions. Generally, to better describe the formation of our ideas and avoid limited beliefs, we should replace the word belief with the word thought. Limited beliefs can be acquired by the media, relatives, and friends. People tend to gather information that supports their existing beliefs rather than the ones that form new beliefs. Therefore, instead of owning a belief, a person should question the limiting beliefs and come up with theories that are based on evidence. Overall, the question “why be moral?” is an essential question because it is a socially important. Thus, because beliefs are not a private matter, a better question can be: would you like the others to behave morally with you?
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- The word abortion by definition means the deliberate termination of a pregnancy usually before the embryo and fetus is capable of independent life. Abortion, universally regarded as a bone of contention, is a controversial issue, while some people think abortion is immoral, other believe women should have legal right to elective abortion. In my opinion, abortion should be illegal because it is ethically and morally wrong. Although abortion is an efficient way for unready mothers to change their lives, abortion is morally and ethnically wrong because it is murdering an unborn child who has the right to live.... [tags: Abortion, Pregnancy]
1259 words (3.6 pages)
- When considering whether the piece of legislation titled “The Death with Dignity Act” is morally and philosophically justifiable, the moral and philosophic viability of what is referred to as active voluntary euthanasia must first be evaluated. Because active voluntary euthanasia seeks to reduce the amount of suffering of the patients as well as offer individuals greater control over their life it can be justified, and the “Death with Dignity Act” outlines a responsible method for enacting active voluntary euthanasia.... [tags: Euthanasia Essays]
877 words (2.5 pages)
- Death Penalty is Morally Unjustified Due to Its Non-Deterrent Nature, Failure to Provide Justice, and Associated Risks of Executing Innocent People Capital punishment is the extreme form of punishment associated with the killing of a criminal linked to a particular offense. Societies have historically used the death sentence as a way of eliminating extreme wrong doers. Tribal communities have always found the penalty appealing since it is immediate, direct, and debilitating. Some of the old methods of capital punishment include crucifixion, slow slicing, disembowelment, burning, stoning, decapitation, and strangulation.... [tags: Capital punishment, Crime, Murder, Death row]
1745 words (5 pages)
- Introduction: Job David Guerrero lived in downtown San Diego when he was suspected of attacking five homeless men with serious upper-body injuries. Two of which were found dead with their bodies set on fire. Guerrero was linked to the murders form eyewitness testimony and video camera footage. Guerrero should deserve the death penalty under the act of which he commits a murder. This policy of action is morally justified through Lex Talionis, Kantian ethics, Gelernter and the social contract. Although arguments such as Jeffrey Reiman’s might oppose the death penalty and support lesser punishment, my position is a stronger alternative.... [tags: Capital punishment, Murder, Crime]
1095 words (3.1 pages)
- The topic of abortion is a very sensitive subject in the world today. This begs the question “Is abortion morally acceptable?” I, myself, believe that “abortion is seriously immoral and that it is in the same moral category as killing an innocent adult human being.”(Minch, p.604) In this essay I will define abortion and give a brief summary of the case Roe v. Wade, tell why I believe abortion is immoral, provide a counter argument for a person who is pro-choice, and conclude by supporting my pro-life argument and providing an alternative to the pro-choice argument.... [tags: Roe v. Wade, Abortion, Human, Pregnancy]
1397 words (4 pages)
- Abstract In the following essay, I argue that euthanasia is not morally acceptable because it always involves killing, and undermines intrinsic value of human being. The moral basis on which euthanasia defends its position is contradictory and arbitrary in that its moral values represented in such terms as ‘mercy killing’, ‘dying with dignity’, ‘good death’ and ‘right for self-determination’ fail to justify taking one’s life. Introduction Among other moral issues, euthanasia emerged with modern medical advancement, which allows us ever more control over not only our life but also death.... [tags: Euthanasia Essays]
1644 words (4.7 pages)
- I argue that both active and passive euthanasia are morally permissible because they both involve the ending of life due to extraordinary circumstances. If it is evident that a person is not going to get better, even with treatments, and the person wants to end their life, then that is what should be done. If a person wants to live and wants to go through with treatments for as long as possible then they should be allowed to live, but it is sometimes wrong to prolong life. We must think about the quality of life in these situations.... [tags: Death, Morality, Suffering, Suicide]
1324 words (3.8 pages)
- Introduction This week, we have try to explain the act of stealing food to feed a starving child through the eyes and views of three different ethical philosophers and of they approved or disapprove the act. We learned a lot about the different schools of ethics and virtues and even more ethical philosophers through the centuries. It is fascinating reading about all these ethical philosopher’s views and teachings and it was not easy to just pick three to use for this assignment. I tried to pick a more varied school ethical philosophers to make me think just a little bit harder on this week’s assignment.... [tags: Ethics, Virtue, Philosophy, God]
883 words (2.5 pages)
- Introduction This week, we have try to explaining the act of stealing food to feed a starving child through the eyes and views of three different ethical philosophers. We learned a lot about the different schools of ethics and virtues and even more ethical philosophers through the centuries. It is fascinating reading about all these ethical philosopher’s views and teachings and it was not easy to just pick three to use for this assignment. I tried to pick a more varied school ethical philosophers to make me think just a little bit harder on this week’s assignment.... [tags: Ethics, Virtue, Philosophy, God]
939 words (2.7 pages)
- A person lives in a third world country where the minimum wage is not enough to provide for his whole family. He decides that stealing money from people on the street is easier than working extra hours. The action of robbing for a good reason is morally bad when analyzed in a Kantian way. It simply cannot be a universal practice, without negative results. on the other hand, if one analyses the issue in a Utilitarian way, the results become a lot more complicated because a great degree of speculation is needed to reach a conclusion, and even then, the conclusion is not definite.... [tags: Immanuel Kant, Ethics, Morality, Logic]
914 words (2.6 pages)