The second concept leaders must account for which followers are accustomed. All three leaders discussed above had an easier transition, because all three countries were familiar with male leaders. This is typical because male leaders are sought to give stability and safety (Thoroughgood). Germany and Cuba would not have accepted anything other than a strong and confident male leader. Jim Jones’ situation was slightly different in the way that there were male leaders on both sides of the civil rights movement; however, leader speak out so strongly in support for desegregation would have been a strong pull. Another important aspect was that he was a white man, who was told to have even believed in desegregation as a child. The stories about him …show more content…
This relationship is referred to as The Leader-Member Exchange Theory (LMX). This theory discusses how close followers feel to their leader (Yulk 154). This basic concept behind this theory is that humans want to feel special, needed, and valued. By sharing geographical similarities and offering stability and hope, all three leaders start the affiliation, but due to a smaller number of followers Jim Jones is the best example of LMX. It is important to note that an actual relationship between the follower and the leader is not necessary, as long as the follower perceives there to be a relationship, Jones was able to create the allusion of being close to every follower, by preaching every Sunday. He would call random people from the congregation and say that god had told him to heal them. This produced the idea that he was speaking on all of their behalves to god, which when coupled with his continual preaching on acceptance, an aura of care was built around him. It also helped that he intermingled with his followers, shaking hands and listening stories, which helped form what seemed to be bonds. These high LMX relations allowed all three leaders much leeway in their actions. When an individual is liked, people are less likely to question their motives, because it is perceived that the person is acting in the best interest of the …show more content…
Instead of following anyone, assess why this person is leading and why people are following them. There will never be one solution when dealing with bad leaders, but if followers take action progress will be made. This action does not have to be extravagant. Sometimes simple questions can make things clearer. A quote from Hitler reads “Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it”. If only followers would have questioned why Jews were being singled out, or why moving to a cut off location would benefit the spreading of equality, or why persecuting a whole class for their wealth while trying to become part of that status, then these bad leaders would not have had such success in accomplishing their goals. Take charge of who you idealize, seriously evaluate how and how you follow, and never be afraid to question motives or plans. By doing these three things the whole process will be strong. The definition of insanity is doing the something over and over and expecting a different result. Do not be repetitive. Be the
Chapter 12.3 discusses approaches to leadership. The leadership theory of Leader-Member Exchange suggests that “leaders adopt different behaviors with individual subordinates and that the particular behavior pattern of the leader develops over time and depends, to a large extent, on the quality of the leader-subordinate relationship” (Landy & Conte, 2013, p. 494). In essence, this leadership theory references how close the leader is with the staff member. Is there a feeling of trust? Is the staff member one that holds expertise in their role that the leader can rely on? Building a relationship with a staff member doesn’t happen instantly. The relationship grows over time which can result in staff members being a close confidante to the
When it comes to the topic of leadership, most of us will agree that we are curious as well as critical of our leaders, and their actions. Political and religious leaders are often under close scrutiny. As influential leaders they set the vision, tone and goals of any organization. Hence, a leader 's , behavior and leadership style are constantly scrutinized and if appropriate, their leadership traits ought to positively impact followers. According to Northouse (2012), “A leader affects and is affected by followers and both leader and followers are affected in turn by the situation that surrounds them”(p.5). Efficient leaders are remembered by their visions and actions.
The Leader-Member Exchange Theory, or LMX, is a two-way relationship between management/supervisors and their employees/subordinates. The theory assumes that leaders use different management styles, leadership styles, and behaviors with each individual subordinate or group of subordinates. The exchange between supervisors and subordinates will be inconsistent between each individual member of the group. A supervisor may be very kind and supportive to one employee/group and be very critical and unresponsive to another employee/group. Due to this type of interaction, the LMX theory suggests that leaders classify subordinates into two groups, the in-group members and the out-group members (Gibson, Ivancevich, Donnelly, & Konopaske, 2012, p. 334).
Fostering a personal work relationship between leaders and followers become increasingly effective. The foundation of the relationship is built upon trust, understanding and concern for the follower’s wellbeing. Performance is enhanced
The overall attention of this essay will concentrate on the theory of distributed leadership and how it may appear in research to provide the way forward in organisations, so that complex health and social care problems can be addressed across working boundaries. Moreover, the idea of organisations engaging in distributed leadership in practice will be discussed as to how the use of this leadership style might be extremely challenging for individual leaders and organisations to introduce and embed. Notwithstanding, reports such as The King’s Fund (2011) which fundamentally explored the ways in which the National Health Service (NHS) must realise the importance of leadership and look to adopting a leadership style that would improve the future
What is my leadership philosophy? I do not know. I have never put much thought into it my personal leadership philosophy. I have been put into leadership positions from the time I was a child. No one ever told me I was a leader. My coaches chose me to be the captain of my little league teams. This trend continued through middle school, high school and all the way through college.
I feel you must be able to follow before you can lead, and sometimes followers have an advantage, because followers observe & pay more attention to their surroundings than leaders do and some leaders rely on their followers for most information. Most leaders don’t teach followers how to follow, they just follow. We all want to be leaders at some point in life for something, and no one wants to be a follower. From further reading the article I analyzed that leaders who can’t risk, can’t lead. We want to give praise and look up to the leaders all the all the time and look down on the followers, because most people think followers are weak individuals who only do what they are told and don’t support their leaders whole heartedly and don’t speak up when something is wrong or a problem or situation arises. In doing further research Ira Chaleff said the followers and leaders share a common purpose being a follower is the best training for a becoming a
Jennifer Unger & C. Anderson Johnson, “Explaining Exercise Behavior and Satisfaction with Social Exchange Theory,” Perceptual and Motor Skills 81 (1995): 603-608.
In research, business, and life there is much focus and attention given to leaders and the importance and desire of leading with little thought given to followers or following. People hear phrases such as “don’t be a follower” and develop a negative image of what followers are or the role they fill (Kellerman, 2007; Kelley, 1988). Followers are necessary for leaders to lead, a fact that is often taken for granted. Both roles are required for an organization to function and individuals find themselves moving from role to role as the situation changes or allows.
The meaning of leadership has many different meanings but there is one that really sticks out to me which is, being a leader of a group, and having that feeling of importance. In leadership of philosophy we learned that there not really a real difentation. According to John C Maxwell, “ A leader is one who knows the way, goes the way, and shows the way. My view of leadership is teamwork, teambuilding, a group leader, and group work. Leadership is a very important in order to be successful.
When it comes to making decisions, some individuals do it easily while others struggle with the process. The individuals that make decisions without difficulty have the ability to influence those that have a hard time deciding. By changing how other people act, individuals establish themselves as leaders. Leadership refers to the power that certain individuals have over others. This influence helps in guiding the behavior of the other people who are considered followers. While the power comes from the leaders, people choose to act willingly and without any form of coercion.
Leadership is such a big part of our world today, because it shapes us into the
The Leadership role has it’s exceptional demand on it’s own when it comes to big metropolis organization. The organization I work at it has chain facilities where leaders are not judged by the followers. The followership quotient definitely depends on the behavior of the leader, and most followers follow the footsteps of the leader. Perhaps the organization I work for has it’s own defaults when it comes to leadership. I often look at my manager as the leader of the team, and other times, I look at our scheduling leader and feel she the leader of the team. However my perspective changes based on the scenarios that get handled by each of them.
So fast the time went for the course and we all are at the end of the course. I learned so many insights from the class during interactions on weekly discussions and PBL case scenarios.
Leadership, as shown in the video, is very broad. Leadership is grouping people and influencing them to work together as one in order to achieve a common goal or vision. It can either be the promoter of world peace, a powerful innovation, or even the initiator of war. Leadership, in both ways, requires someone to do what one loves to do because leaders excel in their own ways and in their own fields of interest. Every day we meet leaders, some from religious organizations, some are from political parties, school organizations, professional organizations, and others are from rebellious organizations.