Sir Karl Popper Essays

  • Conjectures and Refutations by Sir Karl Popper

    1106 Words  | 3 Pages

    Conjectures and Refutations by Sir Karl Popper In a broad sense science is a systematic quest for knowledge. With this working definition in mind one can see that many areas of human endeavors could qualify as science. Therefore, Popper attempts to find a point of demarcation between science and psuedo-science. "Is there a criterion for the scientific character or status of theory."(1) The most widely accepted answer to this problem Popper says is induction and empirical method. At this point

  • Sir Karl Popper's Falsifiability Claim

    765 Words  | 2 Pages

    Sir Karl Popper's Falsifiability Claim Popper's claim that "the criterion of the scientific status of a theory is its falsifiability" (Klemke, 1988) may be viewed as an observation of, rather than a complete departure from, earlier criteria for science. Klemke states in his introduction to part one (p. 16) that defining science (or the scientific method) has traditionally consisted of utilizing seven criteria that must be met in a specific order. Criteria number (5) and (6) refer to deduction

  • Sir Karl Popper's Falsifiability Claim

    832 Words  | 2 Pages

    Sir Karl Popper's Falsifiability Claim Popper asserts that "it is easy to obtain confirmations, or verifications, for nearly every theory--if we look for confirmations." Kuhn illustrates (page 6), in his discussion of cosmologies, that man needs a structure for his universe. Man needs to explain the physical relation between his personal habitat and nature in order to feel at home. Explaining this relation gives meaning to his actions. Moreover, Kuhn says observation is a double edged sword

  • Karl Popper's Falsifiability

    978 Words  | 2 Pages

    Karl Popper's Falsifiability Sir Karl Popper's lecture was very thought provoking concerning "where to draw the line." Unlike most people, the validity of the theory was not his concern as much as how that validity is determined. This is an issue that really does not get the attention that it deserves. Popper's claims concerning, "When should a theory be ranked as scientific?" and "Is there a criterion for the scientific character or status of a theory?" seems to be put together in the following

  • The Abandoning of Induction in Favor of Deduction and Falsification

    1039 Words  | 3 Pages

    with Applications: Student Support Edition. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2009. 283. Print. "Early Acid Base History."Early Acid Base History. N.p., n.d. Web. 28 Mar. 2014. "The Problem of Induction (1953, 1974)."The Problem of Induction, by Sir Karl Popper. N.p., n.d. Web. 28 Mar. 2014. . Schaller, Chris P. "Concepts of Acids and Bases."Structure in Chemistry. College of Saint Benedict, n.d. Web. 28 Mar. 2014.

  • Psychological Egoism (Philosophy Paper)

    621 Words  | 2 Pages

    would become trivial. (It is worth noting that Kripke’s claim that there are a posteriori necessary truths does not show that a priori truths are not analytic.) The situation is paralleled by pseudo-sciences such as Freudian psychoanalysis. As Karl Popper has argued, any theory can be maintained so long as it is drained of empirical content. Like psychoanalysis, psychological egoism makes no genuine claims and can never be refuted. But it purchases certainty at the price of becoming vacuous. I shall

  • Fundamental Faults in Hegelian Historicism

    907 Words  | 2 Pages

    “Philosophy is the history of philosophy”-Georg Hegel. Historicism is one of the important pillars of Hegelian philosophy, which attempts to provide insight on human social activities and thought process. According to Hegel, our thoughts and activities are directly influenced, defined and can understood by their history. Despite its perceived appeal in explaining this ultimate declaration, it has been the source of philosophical debate over the years and have been criticized by some philosophers

  • The Unresolved Bridge Problem

    982 Words  | 2 Pages

    Philosopher Karl Popper, an inductive skeptic, is criticized by his objection to confirmation. Rather than using the term confirmation to describe a theory that has continued to be proven correctly, Popper created his own term. Popper says that corroboration is a term used to describe theories that have been tested and not yet falsified. According to Peter Godfrey-Smith (G-S), “Popper can say why we should prefer to use a theory that has not been falsified over a theory that has been falsified” (Smith

  • From Mind to Supermind: A Statement of Aurobindonian Approach

    3378 Words  | 7 Pages

    theories of mind prevalent today have had their origin and development in the West. They can be classified as : Psycho-analytical (cf., Sigmund Freud, Karl Jung, A. Adler), Behavioural (cf., Gilbert Ryle), Gestalt (cf., Max Wertheimer, Kurt Koffka, Wolfgang Kohler), Physiological (cf., J. J. C. Smart, U. T. Place, Feigl), Psycho-physical (cf., Karl Popper), Evolutionary (cf., Henry Bergson, Samuel Alexander, Whitehead), Functional (cf., R. Rorty, Peter Smith, O. R. Jones), and Mental or Homo Sapiens-oriented

  • Jürgen Habermas: Public Sphere and Media Sphere

    1169 Words  | 3 Pages

    Minuit Karl R. Popper, 1971. The Open Society and Its Enemies, Vol. 1: The Spell of Plato. 5 Revised Edition. Princeton University Press Lewis H. Lapham (New Introduction By) Marshall McLuhan (Author), 1995. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. 3rd Printing, 1995 Edition. The M.I.T. Press. Malcolm Gladwell . The Guardian. 3 October 2010. Jürgen Habermas . 1962. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Karl Marx. 1867

  • What is Science

    702 Words  | 2 Pages

    famous American astronomer Maria Mitchell (1818-1889) put it, "Question everything". The result is that theories come and go, or at least are modified through time, as old ideas are questioned and new evidence is discovered. In the words of Karl Popper, "Science is a history of corrected mistakes", and even Albert Einstein remarked of himself "That fellow Einstein . . . every year retracts what he wrote the year before". Science is the observation of natural events and conditions in order

  • Descartes Scientific Method

    586 Words  | 2 Pages

    With his method of radical skepticism, Descartes escaped a chain of assumptions built on dogmatic “results” and laid a new foundation for science rooted in observation and experiment. Dissatisfied with the qualitative evidence of Aristotelian syllogisms, Descartes sought to avoid building on assumptions by promoting criticism and rigorous review of hypothesis, which could them be pieced together mathematically to develop scientific theory. While Descartes left a framework that continues to drive

  • Peirce, Virtuality, and Semiotic

    3089 Words  | 7 Pages

    Peirce, Virtuality, and Semiotic The adjective "virtual," practically unheard-of a few years ago, has without a doubt become the number one buzzword of the nineteen-nineties. Virtual reality has become a catch phrase for the interactive multimedia technologies that have supplanted desktop publishing at the cutting edge of personal-computer graphics technology. The virtual communities which for years have flourished in comfortable obscurity on the Internet, have recently been thrust into the

  • Plato's Perception: A Biased View on Societal Reality

    756 Words  | 2 Pages

    Plato’s view was biased due to the death of his mentor, Socrates. Plato intended to demonstrate the view of the majority during this time or what the people thought ought to be correct or more as of how agreeable they were. Karl Popper argues that Plato wished to have a comeback to tribalism and professes it to be propaganda though, Plato spoke about a desire for good and a neglect for anything else. Plato speaks of good citizens who do no wrong being insulted due to their love for being unknowingly

  • Limitations to Our Common Ways of Knowledge

    1209 Words  | 3 Pages

    Being humans, we are inherently curious creatures, ever ready to learn something new. In order to survive in and learn about this world, we normally use the four conventional ways of knowing: emotion, perception, reason, and language. From traditional definitions, we know tools are things used to shape, form, or finish. The above quote by Abraham Maslow can be applied to the pursuit of knowledge. In the TOK context, we can make interesting discussion about the limitations of our ways of knowledge

  • The Verification Principle and Ethics

    643 Words  | 2 Pages

    In order to understand the Verification Principle, one must first become familiar with Logical Positivism. Logical Positivism is a school of philosophy that combines empiricism, the idea that observational evidence is indispensable for knowledge of the world, with a version of rationalism incorporating mathematical and logico-linguistic constructs and deductions in epistemology, the study of knowledge (Wikipedia). The Verification Principle as A.J. Ayer states, is a statement is cognitively meaningful

  • Giambattista Vico

    1005 Words  | 3 Pages

    “On The Study Methods of Our Time” Giambattista Vico was the professor of rhetoric at the University of Naples from 1699 until 1741. A self described autodidact, Vico attested to a “culturally based epistemology” in a time that valued the stoic style of the Cartesian method. While initially written off as an opponent of Descartes’, Vico valued the usefulness the Cartesian method. “On The Study Methods of Our Time” was written in 1709 as an address to his University. As a form of “State of the

  • Karl Popper and Falsifiability

    1346 Words  | 3 Pages

    Karl Popper and Falsifiability Karl Popper's claim that "the criterion of the scientific status of a theory is its falsifiability" is a clearly viable statement. This is a natural extension of his idea about how scientific knowledge is increased (Edwards, 1967). In an attempt to define science from pseudo-science, Popper states that the growth of scientific knowledge begins with an "imaginative proposal of hypotheses" (Edwards, 1967). Then, the scientist must search for illustrations or situations

  • Karl Popper Falsification

    1185 Words  | 3 Pages

    Sir Karl Popper described a new theory to scientific methodology known as falsification. His view indicates that a claim can only be scientific if it is able to be falsified. Popper believes that verification should be placed on refuting or falsifying evidence rather than putting value on confirming a theory through experimentation. Using the Holy Grail analogy, his view indicates that you never know if you have a correct theory because even though it may be glowing or correct at this moment in time

  • Advances in Technology Play a Significant Role in Understanding The Universe

    896 Words  | 2 Pages

    Print. Kuhn, Thomas S. Copernican Revolution: Planetary Astronomy in the Development of Western Thought. London: Harvard UP, 1972. Print. "Early Reflectors (Cosmology: Tools)." Early Reflectors (Cosmology: Tools). N.p., n.d. Web. May 2014. . Popper, Sir Karl. "Philosophy of Science: a Personal Report." British Philosophy in Mid- century. Ed. C.A. Mace, 1957. Rpt. in Introductory Readings in the Philosophy of Science. Rev. ed. Ed. Klemke, E.D., Robert Hollinger, and A. David Kline. Buffalo: Prometheus