Essay PreviewMore ↓
In Great Britain, before America was one, British soldiers were allowed to enter a person’s house without any probable cause to tear up the house looking for untaxed goods. The fourth amendment was made to keep innocent people from having their houses destroyed under false pretences. Now in order for a law enforcement officer to enter and search a house legally they must have a court order signed by the judge. The fourth amendment gives people the right to have their own legal privacy.
When a police officer in Great Britain believes that a citizen has illegal goods (untaxed), they will forcefully enter and search the whole entire house. After all is said and done the officers leave without finding anything, the house is a mess, and the people are stripped of their dignity. Colonists were outraged, so when they arrived in America and formed the amendments they put freedom of privacy as their 4th amendment. The history of the 4th amendment comes from the unruly searches in Great Britain, and the colonists didn’t want that in their new country.
In 1957 Miss Mapp was suspected of having a bomber hiding out in her home. The police forcibly entered Miss Mapp’s house without showing her a search warrant (but still claiming to have one), she wouldn’t let them into her house so she was hand-cuffed. After the police were done with the search they had found no evidence of a bomber, but found some pornography. Miss Mapp was tried in court with the pornography the cops found as evidence, and was found not guilty. Everything in this case goes against the fourth amendment. When her house got searched she could not do anything, the cops found nothing of what they were looking for, and she got tried for something the cops found illegally. At the end of the trial the cops had not been punished in anyway. The fourth amendment should state that if a police officer enters a house, without the permission of the person in charge of the house or permission from a judge, they should lose their job.
How to Cite this Page
"Search and Seizure." 123HelpMe.com. 21 Jan 2020
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Search and Seizure In Great Britain, before America was one, British soldiers were allowed to enter a person’s house without any probable cause to tear up the house looking for untaxed goods. The fourth amendment was made to keep innocent people from having their houses destroyed under false pretences. Now in order for a law enforcement officer to enter and search a house legally they must have a court order signed by the judge. The fourth amendment gives people the right to have their own legal privacy.... [tags: Fourth Amendment]
434 words (1.2 pages)
- Although people in the United States are entitled to privacy and freedom there is a limit to that privacy. State or federal officers are allowed where justified to search your car, house, property in order to seize illegal items such as drugs, illegal weapons, stolen goods just to name a few. When the police do searches it can be for various reasons it depends on the situation. They can have a search warrant to go into a premises and confiscate illegal paraphernalia or when doing a routine traffic stop an officer might become suspicious of activity that is not normal and conduct a search of the vehicle to see why the driver is not acting normal.... [tags: Right to Privacy]
552 words (1.6 pages)
- ... If no warrant is present and any evidence was obtained during an unlawful search, it cannot be admitted and must be dropped due to the exclusionary rule. The trial case of Mapp vs. Ohio declared that all evidence obtained by searches and seizures in violation of the Constitution is inadmissible in a criminal trial in a state court. As a result, “[t]he Exclusionary Rule prevents the government from using most evidence gathered in violation of the United States Constitution…applies to evidence gained from an unreasonable search or seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment.... [tags: privacy, authority, right, evidence]
991 words (2.8 pages)
- This assignment will cover a fictitious name of Mary Cooper a woman accused of harboring a fugitive, and illegal stolen equipment. The police attempted an illegal search and seizure in her home without a search warrant. This violates her Fourth Amendment rights. Cooper held that the Fourth Amendment’s protection against unreasonable searches and seizures require the exclusion of evidence found though an illegal search by state and local police officers, extending to the state a rule that previously applied onto to federal law enforcement.... [tags: Supreme Court of the United States]
763 words (2.2 pages)
- Ideally schools in the United States are considered by both parents and students alike to be “safe-havens” where parents can trust their children to learn and remain safe during the day and where students can feel safe in a well-maintained learning environment. However within this fully regulated government service, there are often debates over proper classroom environments, teaching tactics, and privacy issues. Today the main privacy issue in public schools is where to draw the line between keeping the school safe and maintaining the privacy of the students (Boomer par.... [tags: Fourth Amendment 2014]
1500 words (4.3 pages)
- Public school's right to search student lockers. The school locker is usually the only private space available to a student in the environment of the school. So it focuses many of the main issues involved in privacy of the students. The 4th Amendment of the US Constitution states “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses,papers,and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the person or things to be seized.” In 1980 Supreme Court case, New Jersey v.... [tags: Argumentative, Persuasive Essay]
656 words (1.9 pages)
- Most encounters to seizures and searches are shared events a person sees in the media or news. The constitutional rights to basic privacy have frequently controlled to clashes between several private citizens and the officers of the law. An officer performing their duties will sometimes have to make fast decisions which at times may not seem to be thought out thoroughly. Many people engaged in criminal actions, and as long as there is people who engage in these action there will always be officers there to do their jobs.... [tags: constitutional rights, privacy, traffic]
757 words (2.2 pages)
- Mapp vs. Ohio: Illegal Search and Seizure The case of Mapp vs. Ohio is one of the most important Supreme Court decisions of the last century. Until this decision, the rights against illegal search and seizure had no method to be enforced. Up until this time, previous cases at set precedents provided little or no protection from illegal searches and seizures for the accused facing state prosecution. On May 23, 1957, Miss Dollree Mapp heard a knocking at her door (170 Ohio Street). When she asked who it was, three men identified themselves as Cleveland police officers.... [tags: Court Case Mapp Ohio Essays]
1184 words (3.4 pages)
- Intro Well written procedures, rules, and regulation provide the cornerstone for effectively implementing policies within the criminal justice system. During the investigational process, evidence collected is subjected to policies such as Search and Seizure, yet, scrutinized by the Exclusionary Rule prior to the judicial proceeding. Concurrent with criminal justice theories, evidence collected must be constitutionally protected, obtained in a legal and authorized nature, and without violations of Due Process.... [tags: Illegal Search and Seizure]
1244 words (3.6 pages)
- The Exclusionary rule requires that any evidence taken into custody be obtained by police using methods that violates an individual constitutional rights must be excluded from use in a criminal prosecution against that individual. This rule is judicially imposed and arose relatively recently in the development of the U.S. legal system. Under the common law, the seizure of evidence by illegal means did not affect its admission in court. Any evidence, however obtained, was admitted as long as it satisfied other evidentiary criteria for admissibility, such as relevance and trustworthiness.... [tags: Illegal Search and Seizure]
835 words (2.4 pages)
- Means of Avoiding Osteoporosis
- Comparing the Plays, A Raisin in the Sun and Death of a Salesman
- The Healing Power of Music
- For Colored Girls who have Considered Suicide when the Rainbow is Enuf
- The Mistakes of the Brilliant General, Napoleon Bonaparte
- Change is Inevitable: "Where the Red Fern Grows" by Wilson Rawls
The fourth amendment gives people the right to have their own legal privacy. Back before America was formed this amendment was being dreamt of by colonists. Luckily for them their dream came true, there was a constitution made and the fourth amendment was the one they had always wished they had. There is no denotation for the 4th amendment other then the government doesn’t have full control over everyone at all times, which is a terrible thing.
"Mapp." Web. 10 Nov. 2009.