Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on Rappaccini's Daughter by Nathaniel Hawthorne
Essay on Rappaccini's Daughter by Nathaniel Hawthorne
Essay on Rappaccini's Daughter by Nathaniel Hawthorne
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The short story “Rappaccini’s Daughter” can be seen as a love story about young man determined to be with his beloved, despite the fact that she is poisonous. However, when examining the text, underlying theme about science arise. During the time in which this piece was written, science was rapidly evolving. “All biological sciences must first go through a taxonomic stage since their data must be put in order before they can be employed in research on an analytical level”(Shryock 291) “Rappaccini’s Daughter” by Nathaniel Hawthorne uses Rappaccini’s unrelenting pursuit of knowledge that resulted in the tragic loss of his daughter; to show the productive and destructive powers of scientific discovery, which evolved American society during the 18th century.
The main character is a young man named Geovanni; he falls madly in love with Beatrice, the daughter of the mysterious Dr. Rappaccini. The scientist has a magnificent garden of poisonous plant that even nature could not produce; he had his daughter handling them which eventually lead to her becoming poisonous herself. Geovanni is warned by his teacher Professor Baglioni, that Dr. Rappaccini is known to use science to do unnatural things. “But as for Rappaccini, it is said of him- and I, who know the man well, can answer for its truth- that he cares infinitely more for science than for mankind.”(Hawthorne 1035) He was willing to sacrifice his own daughter to carry out his relentless quest for knowledge; and the ability to control nature.
Parallels that can be draw between the story and the destructive and constructive power of science that were at work during the18th century. These include the evolution of science, man’s desire to have dominion over nature...
... middle of paper ...
...f 18th century American society. Parallels between Rappaccini’s garden and The Garden of Eden, shows the influence of the church. Rappaccini tried to play god and it caused him to lose his most favorite flower, his daughter Beatrice.
Works Cited
Hawthorne Nathaniel, “Rappaccin’s Daughter” Ch.6. 2009. Science Fiction Stories and Contexts. Ed. Stephen A. Scipione and Marissa Feinstein. Boston: Bedford/ St. Martin’s n.d 1029-1051.
Gould Stephen J. “The Mismeasure of Man” Penguin books Ltd. New York. New York. Robinlea.com. Web. 18 Nov. 2013
Wachtel, Albert. "Rappaccini’S Daughter." Masterplots, Fourth Edition (2010): 1-3. Literary Reference Center Plus. Web. 17 Nov. 2013.
Shryock, Richard H. "Eighteenth Century Medicine In America." Proceedings Of The American Antiquarian Society 59.2 (1949): 275-292. America: History and Life with Full Text. Web. 18 Nov. 2013.
Frederic is very much alienated from the science of his day. He finds it obscure and frightening, involved in inhuman and ritualistic experiments, and motivated by goals that are fully detached from the needs of ordinary people. His dread and loathing of the coldness and ruthlessness of the aloof scientist come from the Gothic horror of writers like Edgar Allen Poe and Mary Shelley.
There are stunning parallels between Nathaniel Hawthorne's "Rappaccini's Daughter" and the film The Truman Show in terms of character, action, and structure.
Microcosm and allusion are both exceedingly important in writing even today, and Nathaniel Hawthorne was able to execute this greatly in many of his short stories. In this essay we will be focussing on two of Nathaniel Hawthorne’s short stories, “Rappaccini’s Daughter” and “The Birth-Mark”, in which there is a multitude of examples of both microcosm and allusions.
In Nathaniel Hawthorne’s short story “The Birth-Mark,” Aylmer, a married scientist, believes himself to be above nature. Acting on these beliefs, he prepares
Gould, Stephen Jay. The Mismeasure of Man. W. W. Norton and Co.: New York, 1996.
In the Nathaniel Hawthorne tale, “Rappaccini’s Daughter,” we see and feel the solitude/isolation of the scientific-minded surgeon, Dr. Rappaccini, likewise that of his daughter, Beatrice, and finally that of the main character, Giovanni. Is this solitude not a reflection of the very life of the author?
"Women Beware Science: 'The Birthmark.'." Short Story Criticism, edited by Rachelle Mucha and Thomas J. Schoenberg, vol. 89, Gale, 2006. Literature Resource Center, link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/H1420071520/LitRC?u=troy25957&sid=LitRC&xid=268bd900. Accessed 8 Dec. 2017. Originally published in Critical Essays on Hawthorne's Short Stories, edited by Albert J. von Frank, G. K. Hall & Co., 1991, pp. 164-172.
In "Rappaccini’s Daughter", Rappaccini is the scientist and father of Beatrice. He is devoted to his scientific studies and to his daughter’s well-being. Rappaccini is the creator of plants with poisonous extracts thus only Beatrice can attend to. Her father had altered her touch and made it deadly to protect her from the evils in the world. She is forced by her father to live in his world without any human contact, instead she can only embrace her "sister" plant in Rappaccini’s garden. Beatrice’s sister plant is the only one that she can handle and embrace without it dying in her hands. As Hawthorne shows her closeness to her pl...
Hawthorne’s stories young goodman and rappaccini's daughter both compare to the biblical tale of the garden of eden. in the next few paragraphs you will see how they are alike.
In Rappaccini 's Daughter, it is full of symbols and symbolic allusions. Its setting is a fantastic garden filled with vegetation and poisonous flowers and in the center is a broken fountain. Hawthorne's focus is on Beatrice as she is seen by Giovanni. Hawthorne presents a trapped and poisonous Beatrice who needs a special kind of redemption. She is a prisoner in the garden and her body is full of poison.
Ever since the earliest scientists, including the likes of Aristotle and Plato, the question of the morality of man's meddling in nature has been a prevalent issue. While science can provide boundless amounts of invaluable contributions to mankind, ultimately some scientific endeavors should never have been pursued. In Frankenstein, Mary Shelly explores the ethics involved in this query through the creation of a wonder of science, and its inevitable consequences.
Mary Shelley expresses various ethical issues by creating a mythical monster called Frankenstein. There is some controversy on how Mary Shelley defines human nature in the novel, there are many features of the way humans react in situations. Shelley uses a relationship between morality and science, she brings the two subjects together when writing Frankenstein, and she shows the amount of controversy with the advancement of science. There are said to be some limits to the scientific inquiry that could have restrained the quantity of scientific implications that Mary Shelley was able to make, along with the types of scientific restraints. Mary Shelley wrote this classic novel in such a way that it depicted some amounts foreshadowing of the world today. This paper will concentrate on the definition of human nature, the controversy of morality and science, the limits to scientific inquiry and how this novel ties in with today’s world.
The essay starts off by stating, “One could say that the dominant scientific world-view going into the 16th century was not all that “scientific” in the modern sense of the
Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein has become almost a myth in our culture; it so deeply probes the collective cultural psyche and our fear of science and progress. “Frankenstein is our culture’s most penetrating literary analysis of the psychology of modern ‘scientific’ man, of the dangers inherent in scientific research, and the exploitation of nature and of the female implicit in a technological society” (Mellor, 1988:38). The interesting thing about Frankenstein is that there can be multiple readings of the text. It can be seen as a conservative criticism of science, a Promethean belief of the unlimited progress of science, the feminist anti-female principle angle to the story, even a religion versus science story. What I will explore through this essay is each of these readings and shed some light on this wonderful novel. “The value of Mary Shelley’s novel lies not in presenting a clear morale but encouraging the readers to make up their own” (members.aon.at.htm).
Hawthorne, Nathaniel. “Rappaccini’s Daughter.” Sam Houston State University. Sam Houston State University, n.d. Web. 30 Jan. 2014.