In our society there has been many heated debates about animal testing. Many people feel as if animal testing is very important to science, it helps us figure out different things about the body and also helps us in psychology, helping us discover how the brain works. Other people, including the author of this article, Heather Dunnuck, believes that animal testing is cruel and unnecessary. In the article “Save the Animals: Stop Animal Testing” she uses all Ethos, Pathos and Logos.
In this persuasive article Heather’s first reason why animal testing should be stopped all together is that even though “humans often benefit from successful animal research, the pain, the suffering, and deaths of animals are not worth the possible human benefits.” In that reason she is using Logos and Pathos.
The next reason she gave was her own translation of Tom Regan’s words. Heather stated
“Animals do not willingly sacrifice themselves for the advancement of human welfare and new technology.” She also said “When humans decide the fate of animals in research environments, the animals’ rights are taken away without any thought of their well-being or the quality of their lives.” This is also Pathos it makes the reader think about how the animals can’t do anything about being tested on, they don 't have a say they are forced.Her next reason is that the pain and suffering that experimental animals are subject to is not worth any possible benefits to humans. “Animals feel pain in many of the same ways humans do; in fact, their reactions to pain are virtually identical (both humans and animals scream, for example).” She also states “When animals are for product toxicity testing or laboratory research, they are...
... middle of paper ...
...als go through during animal testing. That really brings across the Pathos effect. She also uses a reliable source in almost every one of her paragraphs, that shows ethos because she is uses the information she has found and used them for credibility in her article. She also used reasoning throughout the article which is logos.
My opinion about the topic is that I believe you should always test a new item before you introduce them to humans. I really liked her paragraph about the alternative options instead of animal testing, but unfortunately not all experiments have to do with your skin or eyes. I think experimentalist should do the most they can do to make sure a product is the safest it can be and then you can test it on an animal to make sure it is safe. No matter how awful animal testing can be I still believe that it would be more cruel to test on humans.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Opinions are a dime a dozen and everyone has one when it comes to the century old issue of animal testing. These tests are used throughout the world for various experiments on animals. Is animal testing right or wrong. There are several pros and cons of animal testing and I will review both sides of this issue. The testing of animals can benefit the human society because the researchers come up with cures for humans from the animal tests. The researchers utilize a variety of methods to do these tests.... [tags: Animal rights, Animal testing]
1110 words (3.2 pages)
- ... Animals are very different from humans and react differently. "All drugs that have been pulled off the market because they caused severe illness or death in human patients were previously tested on other animals."(Problems With Animal Experimentations) Certain medicines have certain effects on animals but not humans, or medicines can have no effect on animals but have a strong effect on humans. For example, morphine calms humans, excites cats, penicillin kills guinea pigs and hamsters, and cortisone causes birth defects in mice but not humans.... [tags: scientific research, opponents of animal testing]
1021 words (2.9 pages)
- Animal testing has been practiced since ancient times. The ancient Greeks killed and dissected animals for scientific and religious purposes, as well as performed experiments on them to discover the functions of living organisms. Through animal testing, human life has been extended and improved. Many great feats have been accomplished using animal based testing. Animal testing has brought us vaccines for polio, TB, and meningitis, as well as, insulin, and asthma inhalers. It also added in the eradication of smallpox, and continues to assist us as cancer survival rates continue to rise.... [tags: Animal testing, Animal rights]
763 words (2.2 pages)
- Animal testing is the unethical process of forcing unwilling living creatures into often painful or deadly experiments. This process of animal torture is allowed to continue because society’s attitude about animals is very mixed. Many people regard animals- commonly dogs, cats, birds and fish- as their pets and “family members” while companies view test animals as a renewable source of income. So it is believable that among the most commonly tested animals are dogs, cats, birds, hamsters, and small animals with similar human anatomy.... [tags: Animal testing, Animal rights]
1097 words (3.1 pages)
- Is animal testing considered inhumane. Should we as humans do anything to stop animal experimentation. These are only a few of the questions asked by several critics everyday of this topic. Every year in the United States, about seventy million animals are tortured and killed due to cosmetic companies, government agencies, educational institutions, and scientific centers. Poor innocent defenseless animals are mistreated badly everyday for the sake of human safety. Many people believe that animal testing is needed because it has played a vital part in medical research, but those people don’t realize that our advancements in technology have created new methods that can be used instead of anima... [tags: Animal testing, Animal rights, Skin]
903 words (2.6 pages)
- As humans, we are always trying to progress, whether it is up the social ladder, developing new technological and medical advancements, or creating a new product for a brand label. In order for this idea to be released to the population it must first be determined safe for public consumption. In order to do so, labs use animal testing to further understand how it reacts biologically. By using animal testing, scientists can focus on the products chemistry, effects of people, and its toxicology. In the 1950’s Sir Peter Medawar, a British immunologist, suggested to C.W.... [tags: Animal rights, Animal testing]
1428 words (4.1 pages)
- Argumentative Essay: Animal Testing The world is full of chemicals and companies trying to make the most “bang” for their buck. What most people don 't know is that behind most large manufacturing companies sits poor tortured animals rotting away in cages being used for the experimental needs of humans. In the United States alone 100 million animals are used on yearly bases. (Shell Ethics) Animal testing is NOT needed for any reason-it’s killing animals, it’s cruel, and alternative methods are available.... [tags: Animal testing, Human]
1133 words (3.2 pages)
- Cosmetic and drug companies should stop animal testing. By animal testing, the companies not only violate the animals' rights (which is breaking the law), but their testing methods are hazardous which endanger the animal's life. Finally, the companies should stop animal testing because each year we lose hundreds of thousands of animals and could make a difference by stopping this cruelty. Stop the animal testing, and save a life. To start with, cosmetic and drug companies should stop animal testing their products.... [tags: essays research papers]
999 words (2.9 pages)
- Speech: Animal Testing Introduction: Rows of rabbits wait in cages, their heads tightly clamped in stocks to prevent movement. The lower lids of the rabbits’ eyes are pulled back. Technicians drip nail polish remover, mascara, shampoo, and astringent into their eyes, where the chemicals stay for three to 21 days. The chemicals burn and often blind the animals. Rabbits’ sensitive corneas make excellent subjects for this procedure—called the Draize test—because they cannot cry to wash away the toxic chemicals.... [tags: Animal Testing]
872 words (2.5 pages)
- When it comes to animals and their rights, there is a definite line between our needs and our taking advantage of those species that we consider inferior. As long as man has existed he has been carnivorous, and the same holds true for many other species of animals. Animals are a necessity to humans for survival, whether it be for food, clothing, etc. However, the unnecessary torture of animals through testing is not a necessity for human survival. When it comes to the needless torture of animals that we claim to benefit, the animals lives need to be taken into consideration.... [tags: Animal Testing]
1951 words (5.6 pages)