Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Methodology of natural language processing
Natural language processing methodology
Natural language processing methodology
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Methodology of natural language processing
Sentence Completion using Natural Language Processing Techniques
The primary goal of this project is to automatically answer SAT/GRE style sentence completion questions. For this we have to build a model that will deal with semantic coherence on a sentence level. Initially, we start out by applying Natural Language Processing Techniques on simple sentences. Later, we will see how these Natural Language Processing Techniques scale to complex analogy-based sentences. [Sample sentences are listed in dataset section]
This project will be done as a two-member team -
1) Sai Chaitanya Mallampati [109597269]
2) Paavan Kumar Sirigiri [109596437]
In the research paper {f ``Computational Approches to Sentence Completion"}, the authors Geoffrey Zweig, John C. Platt, Christopher Meek, Christopher J.C. Burges, Ainur Yessenalina, Qiang Lu study the problem of sentence level semantic coherence by answering SAT level sentence completion questions. They build various models using backoff n-gram language model, maximum entropy class-based n-gram language model, recurrent neural net language model, latent semantic analysis and a combination of n-gram and latent semantic analysis. Some of the key observations are -
1) Latent semantic analysis has better accuracy than recurrent neural network [which is better than the n-gram language model]. Since latent semantic analysis takes into picture the global coherence, it was concluded that global coherence is an important parameter to weigh in.
2) A combination of n-gram language model and latent semantic analysis performs better than the individual models. This hybrid model performs significantly better than random selection but is no where close to the levels of human accura...
... middle of paper ...
...of above models
5) We will also explore the feasibility of integrating LSA with labelled dependency language model in order to attain better performance.
We intend to use the n-gram language model results as our baseline for other language models being developed.
For synonym and antonym detection, we will use the WordNet tool. [url {http://wordnet.princeton.edu/}]
1) Computational Approches to Sentence Completion by Geoffrey Zweig, John C. Platt, Christopher Meek, Christopher J.C. Burges [Microsoft Research], Ainur Yessenalina [Cornell University] , Qiang Lu [University of California, Irvine]
2) Dependency language models for sentence completion by Joseph Gubbins and Andreas Vlachos [University of Cambridge]
3) Sentence Completion Task using Web-scale Data by Kyusong Lee and Gary Geunbae Lee [Pohang University of Science and Technology]
Kay Arthur teaches how to recognize key words and phrases by creating lists, summarizing chapt...
First, a brief background in the three dimensions of language discussed throughout this paper. The functional, semantic, or thematic dimensions of language as previously mentioned are often used in parallel with each other. Due, to this fact it is important to be able to identify them as they take place and differentiate between these dimensions i...
I have had many special experiences while playing in band. Just in this semester alone, our band has played in two concerts and a CMEA festival. Our band has also been privileged to have a session with Mr. Smith. Overall, I would like to say that playing in concert band had been a great and learning experience.
Experiment one was a word-search task extending past research by Marsh and Bower (1993). It aimed to test two different concepts. Firstly, to test how rela...
Croft, William, and D A. Cruse. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge, U.K: Cambridge University Press, 2004. USC Upstate Ebook. Web. 27 February 2011.
The other part of computational linguistics is called applied computational linguistics which focuses on the practical outcome of modeling human language use. The methods, techniques, tools, and applications in this area are often subsumed under the term language engineering or (human language technology. The current computational linguistic systems are far from achieving human ability of communicating they have numerous applications. The goal for this is to eventually have a computer program that will have the same communication skills as a human being. Once this is achieved it will open doors never thought possible in computing. After all the major problem today with computing is communication with the computer. Today’s computers don’t really understand our language and it is very difficult to learn computer language, plus computer language doesn’t correspond to the structure of human thought.
The purpose of this chapter is to provide an extensive review of literature on theory of writing, paragraph, grammar, errors, grammatical errors, causes of grammatical errors and error correction.
Schachter, Jacquelyn. Some semantic prerequisites for a model of language. Brain & Language. Vol 3(2) 292-304, Apr 1976.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., Svartvik, J. (1985) A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language, Essex: Longman Ltd.
Fromkin, Victoria, Robert Rodman, and Nina Hyams. An Introduction to Language. 8th ed. Boston: Thomson, 2007.
Curzan, Anne and Adams, Michael. How English Works: A Linguistic Introduction. New York: Pearson Longman, 2006
... applied on different Domain data sets and sub level data sets. The data sets are applied on Maximum entropy, Support Vector Machine Method, Multinomial naïve bayes algorithms, I got 60-70% of accuracy. The above is also applied for the Unigrams of Maximum entropy, Support Vector Machine Method, Multinomial naïve bayes algorithms achieved an accuracy of 65-75%. Applied the same data on proposed lexicon Based Semantic Orientation Analysis Algorithm, we received better accuracy of 85%. In subjective Feature Relation Networks Chi-square model using n-grams, POS tagging by applying linguistic rules performed with highest accuracy of 80% to 93% significantly better than traditional naïve bayes with unigram model. The after applying proposed model on different sets the results are validated with test data and proved our methods are more accurate than the other methods.
The field of Computational Linguistics is relatively new; however, it contains several sub-areas reflecting practical applications in the field. Machine (or Automatic) Translation (MT) is one of the main components of Computational Linguistics (CL). It can be considered as an independent subject because people who work in this domain are not necessarily experts in the other domains of CL. However, what connects them is the fact that all of these subjects use computers as a tool to deal with human language. Therefore, some people call it Natural Language Processing (NLP). This paper tries to highlight MT as an essential sub-area of CL. The types and approaches of MT will be considered, and limitations discussed.
«Traditional» researchers believe that great apes cannot meaningfully relate words. They believe that apes just use words which are mostly liked by their trainers in each concrete situation, but they can be meaningless to apes. For example, «only 12 percent of utterances were spontaneous-that is, 88 percent were preceded by a teacher’s utterance» (Herbert Terrace, 1979). In addition, a famous psychology professor at Columbia University, Herbert Terrace, argues that «even if an animal produced such a sequence» as «water bird,» «we could not conclude that it was a sentence» (1979). Moreover, «the words and word order may be meaningful to an English s...
North, S. (2012), 'English a Linguistic Toolkit' (U214, Worlds of English), Milton Keynes, The Open University.