Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Same sex marriage pros and cons debate
Discussion of Same Sex Marriage
Same sex marriage pros and cons debate
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Same sex marriage pros and cons debate
As a country, we have seen many changes. A big change has been the legalization of same- sex marriage. 1.8% of males say they 're gay,and 1.5% of woman said they are lesbian according to a poll was taken in 2013 by the CDC. 60% of Americans are for same-sex marriage. But after a survey taken in February of 2015, 53% of Americans agree that marriage should be defined only as a union between one man and one woman. I believe that same-sex marriage should not be legalized. There are more cons than pros with same-sex marriage that it should just stay illegal. Same-sex marriage should not be legalized in the united states for the following reasons. God created marriage for a man and woman only. Homosexuals using their surrogate mother and sperm donor wrongly. How straight men are scientifically better than homosexual men in relationships. God created marriage for a man and a woman only. When god created Adam he made Eve not another Adam. In other words, partnerships need a difference as well as similarity as we see in a significant other. If god intended the human race to be fulfilled in both heterosexually homosexually marriage, he would have designed our bodies to allow reproduction through both means of sexual intercourse. In other words look at two puzzle pieces two male ends do not fit together and two female ends do not fit together a male and a female fit together. That 's how it should be with people too. Homosexuals using their surrogate mother and sperm donor wrong. When people fight for same-sex marriage they say about a marriage should be for more than just a man and woman. But what they don 't think about is what if the said couple wants a kid, they have to use a surrogate mother or a sperm donor. A surrogate m... ... middle of paper ... ...ainst same-sex couples following in first racial hate crimes according to the FBI. I 'm not saying it is a good thing that the hate crimes are happening but that 's what happens when you try shoving something down Americans throats. To conclude my paper I just want to say that there are valid points on both sides of this argument. To one person they might be for it while the next will be against same-sex marriage. Either way, no one can change me of my opinion which is that same-sex marriage should not be legal and that the whole idea should be just thrown away. No one on earth let alone the united states will be happy if it stays legal but it also means no one will be happy if it doesn 't stay legal. So if you are for it good for you, if you are against it good for you because either way your opinion and mine are irrelevant to anyone and that is just how humans are.
Within America’s society today, 3.8 percent of the population is gay, lesbian, or bisexual. With only 17 of the 50 states legalizing and recognizing this type of relationship (“History…”), it puts a stronghold on same-sex couples to publicly declare their love with the promise of marriage. Same-sex marriages should be legalized because everyone has equal rights of freedom and liberty.
A surrogacy is the carrying of a pregnancy for intended parents. There are two kinds of surrogacy: “Gestational”, in which the egg and sperm belong to the intended parents and is carried by the surrogate, and “traditional”, where the surrogate is inseminated with the intended father’s sperm. Regardless of the method, I believe that surrogacy cannot be morally justified. Surrogacy literally means “substitute”, or “replacement”. A surrogate is a replacement for a mother for that 9-month period of pregnancy, and therefore is reducing the role of the surrogate mother to an oversimplified and dehumanizing labor. The pregnancy process for the gestational mother can be very physically and mentally demanding, and is unique because after birthing the
The advancement and continued developments of third-party assisted reproductive medical practices has allowed many prospective parents, regardless of their marital status, age, or sexual orientation, to have a new opportunity for genetically or biologically connected children. With these developments come a number of rather complex ethical issues and ongoing discussions regarding assisted reproduction within our society today. These issues include the use of reproductive drugs, gestational services such as surrogacy as well as the rights of those seeking these drugs and services and the responsibilities of the professionals who offer and practice these services.
In conclusion, Surrogacy has played a significant role in people’s lives. It has established itself as a reliable way of having babies for infertile and couples of the same genders to have babies. Surrogacy has its negative effects just like everything else. With the help of Surrogacy infertile and non-infertile couples are able to bond and share the same genes as their children. Surrogacy has taught me how difficult it can be for couples to have babies, however, it has also taught me how society views it in such a negative
Although the protagonists in the NYT article are gay- this is not a gay problem. There are many couples that for one reason or another cannot have children. If compensated surrogacy can give these couples a chance to acquire and care for a child then make it so. The government either federal are state should only make sure of the health and viability of donor, egg and parents. The Baby M story should be used as an example on how not to do surrogacy, not a straightjacket forbidding compensated surrogacy
Surrogacy is becoming extremely popular as a way for people to build their families and women to have a source of income. Many people have various reasons for their opposition to it whether it be by comparing it to prostitution or disagreeing with how military wives take advantage of the Tricare insurance. Lorraine Ali states in her article “The Curious Lives of Surrogates” that one of the more popular reasons to oppose surrogacy is that it contradicts, “what we’ve always thought of as an unbreakable bond between mother and child.” However, a woman’s inability to conceive her own children does not determine the absence of a mother to child bond.
Detractor will state that surrogacy should be illegal because it is immoral, cost prohibitive for most, and even liken it to the sale of a child. Each of these objections to surrogacy are without merit once analyzed closely. There is nothing immoral about surrogacy. Surrogacy is even mentioned in the Bible. Abraham’s wife Sarah is infertile, and offers her slave to Abraham in order to give him a son. Moreover, morality should not be legislated. Bad things have happened throughout history when governments try to legislate morality. The Salem Witch Trials are a prime example of the travesties that can occur when one’s morals are pushed on another. The Crusades are another example of what happens when one’s beliefs are forced upon another. America is a great county that allows people to believe whatever they want to believe. If one does not believe in surrogacy, then he/she does not have to, but he/she should not prohibit other from the pursuit of happiness. Some detractors point out the fact that surrogacy is expensive and therefore should be illegal because it is not attainable for everyone. IVF costs about $12,000 per round in order to cover the medication, surgery, creating and transfer of the embryo, and the pregnancy test afterward(Kuczynski, 2008). This is extremely expensive for most families in America, but it is still a viable option for infertile couples. The entire argument that surrogacy should be illegal because it costs too much is like expecting Ferrari to close its doors because their cars are too expensive. Men and women are created equal, but not all men and women will live equal lives. There will always be the haves and the have nots. There is another group of people that like surrogacy to the sale of children. This argument does not hold water either. Surrogate mothers allow their bodies to be used to perform a function that is not available to an
“It is important for me to go ahead and affirm that I think same-sex couples should be able to get married” (Procon.org), said Barack Obama the 44th and current president of the United States. The gay right movement started in 1969, riots, struggles, and problems followed after. In today’s society, it has been showed that people are opening up to gay rights. There has been effort in protecting the gays and discrimination against gays is now considered a hate crime and is illegal. However, gay rights still to this day struggle with state and federal legal circumstances. Same- sex marriage needs to be legal, couples who choose to be of the same-sex should be allowed to celebrate their commitment with each other the way heterosexual couples get to, both publicly and society acceptable.
Why isn’t gay marriage legal yet? How does gay marriage affect people that aren’t gay? Why does it matter to those people? Why can’t gay people have the same rights as straight people? Gay marriage should be legal worldwide. Gay marriage or same-sex marriage is when a man and man or women and a woman get married. Same-sex marriage impacts society in different types of ways, some people are affected by it because they think it is against the bible, others seem to have no impact or problem with same-sex marriage. However for the gay community it affects them, because in some states they are not allowed to marry the one they are in love with it. Also it impacts them because there are groups of people against same-sex marriage and the gay community is constantly being judged by people opposed to same-sex marriage. Seventeen states have legalized same-sex marriage; Thirty-three states banned same-sex marriage. Same-sex marriage provides a more stable environment for children of gay couples. Legalizing same-sex marriage does not affect or harm heterosexual marriages. Marriage is a union of love, not a union of genders.
Over the last years the topic of same-sex marriage has been of great importance to our society. The idea of the same gender being lawfully married is disturbing to a group of people but in the recent years the number of supporters has increased. The cases that argue for the legalization of same-sex marriage are focusing on the relationship of the individuals and do not see anything in same-sex marriage that could harm our society as a whole. The article “How the President go to ‘I Do’ on Same-Sex Marriage,” published by Joe Becker in April 2014, explains how Barack Obama started saying that he was undecided about the subject matter but is now leaning toward the legalization of same-sex marriage. The subject matter takes a lot of analyzing of what pros and cons are to come from the legalization of same-sex marriage. Same-sex marriage is a global argument that deals with unifying two individuals of the same gender under the law. The main reason that supporters give for justifying same-sex marriage is that it is for the same reason as straight people, to show love and commitment to each other. Furthermore, the argument of same-sex marriage is difficult to generalize because of the multiple factors that need to be taken in consideration when making any decision regarding this topic. Although Becker does have true premises, he lacks clarity in his terms which make his argument be false and invalid.
Gay and lesbian unions have been for a long time a subject that no one liked to discuss. For the last few decades, gays and lesbians have come out and expressed their sexuality preferences. Many believe that same sex marriage should not be legalized because it's against the moral. It's against the definition of marriage, which is considered as the union of a man and a woman as a husband and wife. Same sex marriage should be legalized because the way society views the union of lesbian and gays can a change. Another reason why same sex marriage should be legalized is that children that are issued from a gay or lesbian couple will be loved and raised in a family that is legally recognized under the law. Lesbians and gays also deserve to have the same rights as heterosexuals.
On June 26, 2015, the US Supreme Court ruled that the US Constitution guarantees the right for same-sex couples to marry. Should gay marriages be legal? Clearly we as a nation are undecided on this issue. Thirty-six states have passed legislation banning gay marriages, yet a few states have passed laws that allows homosexual couples the right to participate in civil unions. Several other states are also debating whether or not to allow these couples to marry. Unfortunately, the dispute has left the United States' homosexual community in an awkward position. There are some people who think that gay people have no rights and should never be allowed to marry, and others believe that gay people should enjoy the same rights and privileges as heterosexuals. I think that the United States should allow same-sex couples to marry just like heterosexual couples.
Marriage is defined as the state of being a married couple voluntarily joined for life. In the definition it says couple, with out indication of gender. In our society gay marriage is a hot topic. Previously legalizing gay marriage was out of the question, but as times has changed and more liberal politicians have gained office to reflect the views of today’s society. One of the reasons that LGBT people fight for the right to marry because married couples receive more protections and advantages in the law and insurance polices. Some see marriage as sign of commitment and life long commitment to each other. No matter what the reason gay marriage should be legalized because it is a human right to marry whomever someone loves or at the very least allows same-sex couples the same protections that are afforded to married couples under the law.
Many people believe in a traditional marriage between a man and a woman. God created man and woman to be faithful and produce children. Same-sex marriage is contrary to the word of God and the laws of nature; therefore, it is incompatible with the beliefs, sacred texts, and traditions of many religious groups. Many biblical scriptures talk about how immoral same-sex marriage is.
In conclusion I argue that banning same-sex marriage is discriminatory. It is discriminatory because it denies homosexuals the many benefits received by heterosexual couples. The right to marriage in the United States has little to do with the religious and spiritual meaning of marriage. It has a lot to do with social justice, extending a civil right to a minority group. This is why I argue for same-sex marriage. The freedom to marry regardless of gender preference should be allowed.