Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
History of same sex marriage essay
Same-sex marriage discussion
The rights of gay people paragragh
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: History of same sex marriage essay
Same-Sex Marriages
Marriage is humanity’s version of love written in a legally binding document. Typically when you think of a happy marriage you envision a woman and man exchanging vows of eternal love and support in a church. However, as time has passed homosexuality that was once seen as a“curse” or “affliction” that needs to be driven out has waned by extreme measures, and gay couples’s petition for the right to marry and have their love recognized by the government. Coming from a family with two lesbian sisters and a strong heterosexual father who is a Christian; I’ve seen arguments from both sides and still find that same-sex marriages should be allowed. Same sex marriages should be allowed for the following reasons: gay couples should have the same rights as straight couples, it goes against their constitutional rights as American citizens, and it would bring in revenue for the government.
The slogan “Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve,” is used by most heterosexuals who protest homosexuality, calling it “unnatural” and shudder at the idea of gay marriage. “There are both modern and ancient examples of family arrangements that were, or are based on polygamy, communal child-rearing, the use of concubines and mistresses and the commonality of prostitution, heterosexual monogamy can be considered "unnatural” in evolutionary terms” (Should Marriage Be Legal). This statement debunks arguments against gay marriage who claim that it is not a “traditional marriage,” because not even heterosexual marriages today represent the traditional ways. Another anti-homosexual is Peter S. Sprigg, MDiv, Senior Fellow for Policy Studies at the Family Research Council had the following to say about same sex marriage: “Marriage is a public instit...
... middle of paper ...
...ith determination and uniting can they achieve the same rights as heterosexuals. No one should have their rights overlooked and that includes homosexuals. And in the end as sad as it sounds if anti-homosexuals could look at the monetary benefits to the economy, they would see that gay marriage is not as bad as they think. If there is ever a vote for same-sex marriage in your state, what will you vote for?
Works Cited
ProCon.org. "Gay Marriage: Pro & Con Arguments." ProCon.org. 20 Nov. 2013. Web. 08 April.
2014.
ProCon.org. "Should Gay Marriage Be Legal?" ProCon.org. 7 Nov. 2012. Web. 08 April. 2014.
Thompson Jr, William C. "Office of the New York State Comptroller." Love Counts: The
Economic Benefits of Marriage Equality for New York, BUDGET NOTES (2007).
With the economic support, the adoption rates rising, and the equality same-sex couples deserve, gay marriage deserves to be legalized throughout the nation and the world. Rejecting the right of marriage to these couples hurts them and the way they are able to live their lives. Everyone deserves marriage and life equality despite the person they love because we have equality rights based on us as an individual, not on who we decide to love.
In the article, “Against Gay Marriage,” author William Bennett asserts that permitting same-sex marriages would result in extensive social damage. He states that marriage serves as the cornerstone of societal structure. He envisions that societal indifference on marriages will leave future generations in a state of identity confusion. Representing a different perspective, the article “American Marriage in Transition,” composed by Andrew J. Cherlin suggests that as the practical necessity of marriage diminishes, its symbolic importance may be increasing. He asserts that marriage evolution has arisen alongside many social issues pertaining to expression of personal choice. He connects the expanding role of individualism
The two texts examined within, present the opposing extremes of views regarding gay and lesbian marriage. The first text entitled Let Gays Marry by Andrew Sullivan examines the intricacies of same sex relationships and why homosexual couples should be allowed to publicly show affection for one another. The second text that will be examined is titled Leave Marriage Alone written by William Bennett. Bennett gives his views on why couples of same sex nature should not be allowed to engage in marital relations. These two authors, although very different, each has a view of the ideals of marriage, and how it should be presented to the public.
...ad more meaning to them then everyone will get what they want. Same sex marriage is a thing of the future, it will happen no matter what. People just need a common ground to look at. And that common ground is being able to be considered a family with the one you love no matter what gender they are. And having better tax benefits and increasing the economy so everyone lives a better life.
Marriage Ideals and Ideas Marriage has many has definitions and what William Bennett thinks will destroy the sanctity of marriage has been keeping it alive for centuries. Between William Bennett’s essay “Against Gay Marriage” and Stephanie Coontz “The Radical Idea of Marrying for Love” their ideas of marriage are very different; from fidelity, to same sex couples there is no correct way to be married. The conservativeness of Bennett’s ideals of marriage are simple, between a man and a woman, and completely monogamous; something he claims gay couples cannot commit too. A claim from Bennett is that, “[marriage’s] essential idea is fidelity”(272) and with “a homosexual marriage… a greater need for ‘extramarital outlets’”(272). Bennett however seems to be uneducated in the fact that hererosexual couples do not always fit in those categories for example Coontz, who has researched
Since the 1960’s, same sex relationships have created controversy throughout the United States on whether The LGBT community should be treated any differently from the nuclear couple. However, Cockburn quickly implies the views of Peter Tatchell, the British gay leader and how he believes that marriage forces “‘[Gay men to] conform [and] albeit equality with [society’s’] screwed-up system. That is not liberation. It is capitulation’” (1). Those couples who agree to gay marriage are risking their opportunities to expand themselves in social or cultural ways as they please. Marriage tries to mold a generation of couples that have worked in the past leaving no room for uniqueness. Gay couples are now conforming to society’s orders just to survive and to achieve their aspirations of perhaps having the option to legally own their home one day, having kids, or opening up their own business. Marriage has been the only way the government has approved to helping gay couples achieve their goals and it has also fabricated the idea that it leads to the pursuit of happiness when in reality it is controlling in what ways couples can obtain this feeling of achievement. Society has not only used marriage, but has also manipulated school districts to restrict students from
“Being gay is much more profound than simply a sexual relationship; being gay is part of that person’s core identity, and goes right to the very center of his being. It’s like being black in s society of whites, or a blonde European in a nation of black Asians” (Tamara L. Roleff). Although marriage, cohabitation and parenting styles of homosexual families pose no threats to the heterosexual society; many still believe same-sex marriage goes against its true purpose. “At the national level, American public opinion on the issue remains split (44 percent support legalizing same-sex marriage; 53 percent oppose same-sex marriage in a May 2010 Gallup Poll) even as opposition toward legalizing same-sex marriage is at its lowest point in decades (Jones, 2010)” (Amy B. Becker). Also to one’s surprise, among the vast amount of psychological disorders, homosexuality is not one. Homosexuals are just as capable of sustaining stable and successful relationships and families just as heterosexuals.
Other counterclaims state that same-sex marriage is unnatural, and allowing them to marry may lead to other people/animals in unnatural relationships feeling that they have the right to marry too, such as bestialists and incestists. (procon; page 1) As Glen Lavy, a member of the Alliance Defense Fund, stated in a Los Angeles Times Op-Ed “...marriage between two consenting adults is not inherently more or less ‘correct’ than marriage among three (or four, or six) consenting adults.” He said this whilst comparing the marriage of homosexuals to the marriage of polygamists.
...e same sex, regardless of race or the other characteristics provided, will never be able to fulfill this biological and societal expectation of the word “marriage.” Marriage was not created just for any relationship between humans, but is considered something governed by human nature and therefore natural law. Each of these valid reasons contradicts Corvino’s response that gay sex is not “unnatural,” proving that they clearly violate natural law.
...uction created through inhumane mistakes and violating the rights of whole literary genre of people out of pure ignorance and fearfulness . Dean Martin Luther Riley B King, Jr . Once said, “Unjustness anywhere is a scourge to justice everywhere.” Though we have come a long way in correcting our wrong-doings of our violent chronicle, we still have many milepost to interbreeding before we could ever call ourselves the “demesne of the free people .” Allowing gay marriage would be a positive whole step in the right centering by supporting our citizen’s rights and by helping them to pursue to lives of exemption we have all been promised, all the while strengthening our economy and the togetherness of our country. Unjustness towards gays is injustice towards human beings. We need to learn to come together through our similarity and check exploiting each other’s dispute.
“It is important for me to go ahead and affirm that I think same-sex couples should be able to get married” (Procon.org), said Barack Obama the 44th and current president of the United States. The gay right movement started in 1969, riots, struggles, and problems followed after. In today’s society, it has been showed that people are opening up to gay rights. There has been effort in protecting the gays and discrimination against gays is now considered a hate crime and is illegal. However, gay rights still to this day struggle with state and federal legal circumstances. Same- sex marriage needs to be legal, couples who choose to be of the same-sex should be allowed to celebrate their commitment with each other the way heterosexual couples get to, both publicly and society acceptable.
Gay and lesbian unions have been for a long time a subject that no one liked to discuss. For the last few decades, gays and lesbians have come out and expressed their sexuality preferences. Many believe that same sex marriage should not be legalized because it's against the moral. It's against the definition of marriage, which is considered as the union of a man and a woman as a husband and wife. Same sex marriage should be legalized because the way society views the union of lesbian and gays can a change. Another reason why same sex marriage should be legalized is that children that are issued from a gay or lesbian couple will be loved and raised in a family that is legally recognized under the law. Lesbians and gays also deserve to have the same rights as heterosexuals.
There are many opponents of gay people as it is, and they all have their reasons to dislike the idea of permitting them get married. One of the main reasons is that the primary purpose of marriage is procreation. Because gay couples are unable to have children, they should not be allowed to marry (Schiffen 495). Another main argument is that the word marriage means the union of one man and one woman. This is a long-standing theme of most major Western religions. Under a proposed bill known as the Defense of Marriage act, marriage is defined as “a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife.” Furthermore, it defines a spouse as “ a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or wife” (What 1). Under these guidelines, it is quite obvious that gay couples would not be eligible for marriage. People against homosexual marriage also say that it is a person’s choice to be gay. Since the individual chooses to be a homosexual, they should not be given special privileges. Another argument that you hear is that these couples should not get married simply because of the torment and ridicule they would be faced with in their everyday lives. There are news reports from across America telling about how a gay person was beaten or killed just because they were looked at as different. Some of these people would end up the target of verbal abuse and maybe even physical abuse, just because some heterosexual people see them as different.
Firstly I will discuss the reasons for marriage equality. I argue marriage equality is in the best interest for family life. Allowing homosexuals to form stable committed relationships through marriage would allow for healthier homosexual relationships. You can’t prevent people from being homosexual however giving those people the right to marry can help them experience greater personal happiness. Studies have suggested that not only does legalizing marriage in an area generally make homosexual individuals in that area happier; it also makes them physically and mentally healthier and saves them money on health care (Hatzenbuehler, O’Cleirigh, Grasso, Mayer, Safren, & Bradford, 20012). I don’t see any compelling reason to take away the joy homosexuals get from marriage, this is one of the many reasons I support marriage equality.
The legality of gay marriage is a hot topic for many reasons. Traditionally marriage has been known as a legal bond between a man and a woman. Times have changed since those days. More and more people are coming out of the closet everyday. There are more gay people today than there ever have been and that number is only increasing. Marriage is a way for two people to show their commitment towards each other, so it should not matter what their gender or sexual orientation is.