Private property was a leading cause of inequalities according to Rousseau. Owning property created differences between man, as they could be arranged on different ranks, and the more land one owned, the more powerful. The need to expand for power created the need for imperialism. During the industrialization period near the end of the 19th century, imperialism grew as it translated to European dominance and power. In the 1870’s, most of the European colonies spanned the coastlines of Africa, but by 1914, the entire continent of Africa was colonialized, with the exception of Liberia and Ethiopia. Competition between European nations escalated and greater levels of inequality affected whole countries, comparing the rulers with the oppressed. Civilization superiority became the most problematic aspect of Western Civilization, as they dominated smaller countries in Africa and Asia. According to Jules Ferry, “to support this proposition, is that in fact, just as in word, the policy of colonial expansion is a political and economic system,” therefore imperialism was justified as it improved the political and economic conditions of his own country, whether it be at the expense of another country (Lualdi 187). Even through World War I, imperialized countries aided in the war effort. A condition...
... middle of paper ...
...lity after the wars did not allow for this expected lifestyle as women continued to maintain jobs to provide for their families. Women are still paid less than men.
Since Rousseau’s era, inequalities through imperialism, racism, and sexism changed. As ownership increased between nations, there became a growing inequality gap between rulers and their colonies, it wasn’t until the decolonization after World War II that lessened this gap. Inequalities based on race grew to extremes as slavery, imperialism, and anti-Semitism gained popularity. Sexism throughout the 18th through 20th century fluctuated, allowing more inclusive roles for women through the workforce and suffrage, yet many of these new roles were looked down upon and unsponsored. Inequality gaps continued to widen, but it today’s society, have been recognized and motivated to help improve upon inequalities.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
Explaining the Origins and Evils of Society in Second Treatise of Government by Locke and Discourse on the Origin of Inequality by Rousseau
- Second Treatise of Government by John Locke and Discourse on the Origin of Inequality by Jean-Jacques Rousseau are books written to try and explain the origin of society. Both try to explain the evils and inequalities of society, and to a certain degree to discuss whether man in his natural state is better than man in society. These political science based theories do not appear, at first, to have anything in common with J. Hector St. John De Crèvecoeur’s Letters from an American Farmer, which are letters written by Crèvecoeur during the settling of America and the beginning of the American Revolution, however with examination we can see reflection of both Locke’s and Rousseau’s ideas about... [tags: inequality, power, slavery]
1039 words (3 pages)
- Jean-Jacques Rousseau describes the origins of humanity in his book, Discourse on Inequality. Although Rousseau takes a hypothetical approach rather than a factual, historical approach to surmising the history of humankind, he effectively analyzes the foundations of human inequality and whether it is sanctioned by natural law. Throughout the book, Rousseau strives to outline the history of human development, beginning from the state of nature to the establishment of civil society in order to determine the origins and consequences of inequality and to question the legitimacy of political institutions.... [tags: Political philosophy, Jean-Jacques Rousseau]
1006 words (2.9 pages)
- On the Virtues of Private Property in Locke and Rousseau John Locke and Jean Jacques Rousseau, following their predecessor Thomas Hobbes, both attempt to explain the development and dissolution of society and government. They begin, as Hobbes did, by defining the “state of nature”—a time before man found rational thought. In the Second Treatise and the Discourse on Inequality, Locke and Rousseau, respectively, put forward very interesting and different accounts of the state of nature and the evolution of man, but the most astonishing difference between the two is their conceptions of property.... [tags: Locke Rousseau Philosophical Essays]
2220 words (6.3 pages)
- The moral philosophy that we know and recognize today in the Western world is slave morality, a morality which puts forward ideals of fairness, equality, and democracy. However, many centuries ago during the medieval times, master morality was the norm; a morality that favors those superior in strength, beauty, intelligence, and status. Master morality preceded slave morality. Friedrich Nietzsche was a philologist, who used his knowledge of words to trace the origins of morality from their ancient definitions.... [tags: Friedrich Nietzsche, Jean Jacques Rousseau]
1399 words (4 pages)
- Biography of Jean-Jacques Rousseau MAN is born free; and everywhere he is in chains. One thinks himself the master of others, and still remains a greater slave then they. How did this change come about. I do not know. How can it be legitimate. That question I think I can answer. (Rousseau, Jean-Jacques 1997) Jean- Jacques Rousseau was born on the 25th of June 1712 in Geneva, Switzerland.... [tags: Papers]
1352 words (3.9 pages)
- Throughout the Age of Enlightenment, thinkers such as Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean Jacques Rousseau contemplated the authority of the state over the individual: they are some of the most prominent theorists of this time period, and their studies have aided in the establishment of the Declaration of Independence as well as modern democracy. Each of these men’s historical expositions -- Hobbes’ Leviathan, Locke’s The Second Treatise, and Rousseau’s Discourse on the Origins of Inequality and The Social Contract -- outline how man’s authentic state of nature contributes to the necessity of a social contract which exists in order to maintain civil society.... [tags: State of nature, Political philosophy]
1308 words (3.7 pages)
- There has been a long lasting argument about the two views on life of two men, Golding, and Rousseau. Golding’s view on life is that man is naturally evil at any age. He also believes that civilization makes man good due to the excessive amount of rules that makes man enter a state in which they are no longer in their natural states. Rousseau has an opinion in which man is naturally pure but instead of civilization making man good, it makes man bad due to all of the schemes involved in civilization.... [tags: Lord of the Flies, philosophy]
1085 words (3.1 pages)
- Thomas Hobbes, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, and John Locke are all great thinkers who were greatly influential in forming philosophies that would affect the future of politics. By analyzing each philosopher’s ideology, we can identify which thinker’s theory reflected modern era liberalism the most. For this paper I will be arguing that, John Locke provides a more compelling framework of modern era liberalism because of his perception of the state of nature, the social contract and the function of government.... [tags: Thomas Hobbes, Jean Jacques Rousseau]
1432 words (4.1 pages)
- Comparing John Locke, John Stuart Mill, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau John Locke, John Stuart Mill, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau all dealt with the issue of political freedom within a society. John Locke's “The Second Treatise of Government”, Mill's “On Liberty”, and Rousseau’s “Discourse On The Origins of Inequality” are influential and compelling literary works which while outlining the conceptual framework of each thinker’s ideal state present divergent visions of the very nature of man and his freedom.... [tags: Politics Political Freedom Papers]
2030 words (5.8 pages)
- Rousseau's Approach to Law Rousseau was the presenter of challenging idea about human beings, nature, politics and history. Whether he was found interesting or disturbing, it is impossible not to be affected by his ideas. In this essay it is necessary to explore whether these ideas make him radical as some would suggest or merely makes him , like other thinkers a renowned philosopher, with ideas that he believed would make the world a better place. Rousseau was very definitive about his views of how the world should have been, which is why he was most likely labelled a radical thinker, he heavily attacked the new science of politics that was headed by the lik... [tags: Papers]
987 words (2.8 pages)