Rotten Tomatoes Vs. Meta Critic On The Film Dope

849 Words2 Pages

Rotten Tomatoes vs. Meta Critic on the Film Dope Dope is a controversial film which addresses many issues with today’s youth living in crime-polluted, drug-infested neighborhoods in the city of Los Angeles. The movie, though a low budget film received relatively positive reviews from both Rotten Tomatoes and Meta Critic which have been known for destroying a film’s reputation in the public eye, causing ticket sales and movie goers to plummet all before the movie’s opening weekend, which is when movies earn the most profit. Dope is both comical and surreal bringing more of a lively and relatable experience to movie goers. Rotten Tomatoes and Meta Critic, although known for killing the movie buzz are websites in which movie critics and cinema …show more content…

One particular tomato critic James Berardinelli (2015) had this to say about the movie: “The film 's ability to confound expectations while delivering some big laughs may be its most crowd-pleasing characteristic but the anti-stereotype message rings clear as a bell throughout.” (“Rotten Tomatoes” Top Critics Section, para.2). Dope was deemed certified fresh with a rating of eighty-nine percent on the tomatomeeter (a meter used to take every critic’s score and averages them all for a grade on the meter.) The movie got an average score of 4 out of 5 stars on the website claiming a victory for the low budget film and helping the careers of the young actors who featured in the …show more content…

Meta Critic felt the movie a bit more real to the touch, as appose to a mere mess says one critic Mick LaSalle (2015), “It’s a movie about a geeky teenager living in the Los Angeles hood, and something about it, or rather everything about it, feels real.” (“Meta Critic” Critic Reviews Section, para.1.). Although receiving much criticism from both, viewers at home, and of course the press, the movies stands a great success. We can all agree that the movie was a blast, critic or

Open Document