Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Civil disobedience for or against
Concequences of civil disobedience
Civil disobedience us right
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Civil disobedience for or against
Risking the Lives of Many
In Henry Thoreau’s essay, Resistance to Civil Government, the harmless actions he takes to rebel against the government are considered acts of civil disobedience. He talks about how the government acts wrongful such as, slavery and the Mexican-American war. This writing persuades Nathaniel Heatwole, a twenty-year-old college student studying at Guildford College in Greensboro, North Carolina, to take matters into his own hands, by smuggling illegal items on multiple Southwest airplanes. The reason in that being, is to show the people that our nation is unsafe and dangerous. In doing this, he takes his rebellion one step too far, by not only jeopardizing his life, but as well as many other innocent lives.
To illustrate,
…show more content…
Unfortunately, Heatwole takes this whole situation way too far. A statement an affidavit stated, “He was aware that his actions were against the law and that he was aware of the potential consequences for his actions…” (“Student Charged”). To explain, he knew that he was risking thousands of innocent lives, just to bring the point across that anyone can go through TSA with suspicious items on them. This affidavit goes on to state, “...that his actions were an act of civil disobedience with the aim of improving public safety for the air-traveling public” (“Student charged”). His actions were not acts of civil disobedience. If you have to endanger the lives of thousands air-travelers for the need to increase the safety of traveling, that is plain selfishness. The basic reasoning as to why Heatwole wanted to commit these acts was, as a result of civil disobedience. In relation to, civil disobedience is defined as a peaceful form of political protest, in which Heatwole did not achieve by his actions. In no, way shape or form could anyone find what Heatwole did peaceful. He was careless with the lives of the passengers, and was practically using them for his own gain. The idea of civil disobedience came from the poet Henry Thoreau, a Transcendentalist who did not trust the government. He denounced the federal …show more content…
Assuming he spends a couple years in a jail cell and placed on the “no fly list” would be an appropriate disciplinary action. Although, he was doing for the greater good of people, it still does not give him the right to take away the feeling of security from everyone else. It cannot be stressed enough, that he endangered the lives of many innocent lives by committing this crime. When living in any country, there are always certain laws that must be followed fully, in saying whether they are morally right or wrong. Even though, many people will not agree with certain policies that each government enforces, you still have to abide by your government’s laws. Eventually, the banned items were also safely found a board in the restrooms of the tainted planes in the southern areas like; New Orleans, Louisiana, and Houston, Texas. Unfortunately, there may not be a variety of bright ways to draw attention to your beliefs, and expressing your problem to the public. The reason why Heatwole is connected to Thoreau, is to bring out the point that they both wanted to share their own beliefs with the world. They both want a better, safer place for our future generations to live in. Nevertheless, what Heatwole did was wrong. Furthermore, in following he’s footsteps, by threatening the lives of countless people and his own, and smuggling concealed items that the TSA have
Throughout a series of books, and now movies known as Divergent they hit a lot of points as to what is believed as a “good society”. In the series, Divergent all must conform and fall into a certain category Dauntless, Abnegation, Erudite, Candor, or Amity . If one fails to do so, and falls into all of the categories they are known as “Divergent," and must be killed for failing to conform to traditional society standards and rules. This relates to Civil Disobedience by Henry David Thoreau, because he talks about humans not needing a form of structure set by a hierarchy, such as a government. A good society according to Thoreau, is one with little to no government involvement, one that respects laws to a certain extent, and one that follows
Flight attendants aboard the plane warned federal agents that the Indian-Americans looked suspicious; therefore, the agents took Hebshi into custody to be searched and questioned. The flight attendants and the federal agents were just trying to make sure that everyone on board the flight was safe. Despite the motives, in any circumstance, racial profiling is wrong. The problem with racial profiling in this case is the woman and the two men made it past extensive airport security; therefore, if they were exhibiting any suspicious behavior it would have already been dealt with by security professionals. The problem with racial profiling in every case is that it violates the natural rights of the person that is being victimized.
In the article “Thoreau’s Case for Political Disengagement,” the author, Carl Bankston, examines Thoreau’s portrayal of having a moral conscience while being controlled by society. The author distinctly explains Thoreau’s ideas, while also giving his own opinion on the subject.
"Civil Disobedience" by Thoreau describes the government and what he believes is best. Thoreau implements diction and imagery to support his claim that the best government is one that does not govern at all.
When a person is sick, a doctor first needs to diagnose the symptoms to be able to understand the causes of the illness and adequately treat, manage or eradicate the disease. For instance, a doctor cannot arrive at a diagnosis of a patient and say to the patient " you have diabetes" without analyzing the symptoms and explaining how a disease developed, and what lifestyle habits favor the development of its presence.
Henry David Thoreau (1817-1862) was a philosopher and writer who is well known for his criticism of the American government during the time. During Thoreau’s life, there were two major issues being debated in the United States: slavery and the Mexican-American War. Both issues greatly influenced his essay, as he actually practiced civil disobedience in his own life by refusing to pay taxes in protest of the Mexican War. He states that the government should be based on conscience and that citizens should refuse to follow the law and have the duty not to participate and stay as a member of an unjust institution like the government. I argue that the notion of individualism and skepticism toward government is essential to the basis of many important reform movements in the modern society.
today, perhaps it could be justified. For one, President Donald John Trump’s Immigration Executive Order, which practically bans all foreign immigrants from residing nor entering the nation. America is what it is today because of its diversity. Yet, President Trump and a considerable number of people believe that the country should be of its natives instead of those who seek the privileges of its constitutions and hence potentially violates the Declaration of Independence, which says that all men have the right to seek asylum. Considering how the Declaration of Independence originated the U.S., it is ironic for the nation to limit it. Therefore, civil disobedience is required. As it is apprehended that the matter requires civil disobedience, the negotiation comes in; however, a president could be convinced, but not negotiated with his own nation, and thus this step is nullified. Moving on, the enactment of non-violent direct actions is legally safe from the nation’s military forces, but it could be met with a group of people, potentially possessive of deadly weapons, who support the Immigration Executive Order. As it could be life threatening to some extent, one should be ready to self-defend, but not retaliate to the extent where the other is harmed. Finally, launch coordinated systematic direct actions nationwide for the maximum effect. In doing so, President Trump would eventually have to nullify
Philosophers are those who shape the minds of society, which is why there is no doubt that two of the greatest thinkers are still relevant in today's world. Ralph Waldo Emerson and Henry David Thoreau came up with a philosophy known as Transcendentalism. This states that if people accept their flaws and differences and aren't afraid to stand out from society, then they resemble greatness. As demonstrated in their writings, Walden and Civil Disobedience, by Henry David Thoreau, and Self-Reliance, by Ralph Waldo Emerson, both of these writers emphasize the importance of individualism, intuition, and nonconformity. The ideas that these two men addressed are still constantly being adapted in real life situations all over the world today, even though
If I were that one citizen who was unfairly incarcerated just to benefit the cause of society, I would be outrage...
Many events led up to the tragic events taking place on Kent State’s Ohio campus May 4, 1970. Many believe what the police and the Ohio National Guard did there was brutal and unfair, while others think it was justified. It is understood that protestors were warned their efforts to rally peacefully were against the rules and they were told to disburse. However, many still side with their actions because they believe their cause was just and true. Still, once the Ohio guardsmen approached them, protestors began shouting and throwing rocks at the guardsmen’s vehicle, which in the minds of many justifies a portion of the violence that took place at Kent State that day. Because the protestors began using
On the Duty of Civil Disobidience written by Henry David Thoreau is focused on the flaws of the government and how an individual should responded to the
In the times of Thoreau and, even long before that , the idea that the common man could fight against the higher class man without bearing arms, and without the shedding of blood was near unheard of. Although he was not the first to bring forth the idea that men do not have to wage war to end injustice, his ideas were well put together, and now that the printing press had become well established, reached many more people than any paper would have in previous years. His ideas, both then and now, have proved why it is so influential to keep your ground without dropping to the level of your oppressor, however, sometimes the only words a man will hear come from the mouth of a blade.
Thoreau at the time wanted to stand up for what he believed was right. This being not funding the war which he felt was unjust. So how would he have felt to see our generation? Thoreau would be impressed to an extent because at the time we just went with what the government and others said was “right”. Currently our generation has teens running “Never again” which is the current mass movement to make schools safer. Having a whole list of movement I would feel that Thoreau would say were going in the right place although not there yet. Due to our current leader in office and what trumps is trying to do with his power would seem fairly unjust from Thoreau’s writing. From the way Trump is working with other world powers to the way Trump is handling
Thoreau, Henry. "Civil Disobedience." Elements of Argument: A text and Reader. Ed. Annette T. Rottenberg. 6th ed. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's, 2000. 463-466.
On the night of Sunday, September 11th, I was at the Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport picking up a single-parent mom and her daughter to take them to their final destination within the Dallas area, when I received a parking citation. I was informed after receiving a parking ticket that I could not leave my vehicle parked in front of the passenger pick-up area unattended. It was not my intentions to leave my vehicle unattended in front of the passenger pick-up area. I was waiting to pick-up a passenger, who was traveling with a small child, when I received a phone call from the passenger asking if I could wait just a few more minutes on her while she was waiting for her luggage to be shuttled out from underneath the plane.