Introduction Purpose - The purpose of this Risk Management Plan (RMP) is to describe the methodology that the PPW Company will use in identifying, tracking, mitigating, and ultimately reducing risks that we have identified in the Knowledge Management System. This document will define the risk management roles and responsibilities of the project team. Scope - The scope of this document pertains to the Knowledge Management System Project and its internal and external risks. The risk management methodology identified in this document will be primarily used by the PPW Company project team and it will be used during the entire project. The vendor’s risk management methodology will be provided as a contractual deliverable and they will develop their own separate Risk Management Plan. The vendor will be responsible for managing their project risks and reporting any such risks to the project team. Revision History - This is the revision history log that the PPW Company will use to track and maintain updates to the Knowledge Management System’s Risk Management Plan. The Project Manager and/or his designee are responsible for the update and upkeep of this document. Revision # Date of Release Summary of Changes v1 12/3/2013 Initial Release v2 12/5/2013 Major revisions made. Incorporated Risk Register into the document. Document Maintenance - This document will be reviewed and updated as needed, as the project proceeds through each phase of the system development life cycle. This document contains a revision history log. When changes occur, the document’s revision history log will reflect an updated version number as well as the date, and the change description. Participants Roles and Responsibilities - This section describes the r... ... middle of paper ... ...sponsibility of the Project Manager • Internal and External – Project Manager and an external entity are responsible for control of the risk. Risk Ratings The following ratings will be assigned to each risk: Probability – the probability is based on the impact times the Frequency (1 or 2= Low, 3 or 4 = Moderate, 5 – 9= High 10 – 15= Extremely High). Impact – the impact the risk will have on the project if the risk occurs. (Impact is rated as: 1= Marginal, 2= Critical, 3= Catastrophic) Likelihood – the likelihood that the risk will occur (Likelihood is rated as 1= Unlikely, 2= Seldom, 3= Occasional, 4= Likely, 5= Frequent). References External References Computer Society Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (2005). 1012 - IEEE standard for software verification and validation ; IEEE Std 1012-2004 (revision of IEEE Std 1012-1998). New York, NY: IEEE,
The outline for the RM Plan is being submitted for immediate implementation based on the previously approved Risk Analysis plan. The DLADLIS will set the delivery date for the deployment of the RM plan based on their requirements. As with the previous Risk Assessment Plan, the DLADLIS will set the date and requirements for the RM plan to proceed.
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST): Risk Management Guide for Information Technology Systems. Special Publication 800-30, 2002.
The Poisson distribution will be used in the next section when predicting results and considering the goal expectancies for both the home and away teams. The Poisson distribution is a discrete probability distribution that counts the number of occurrences of an event within a time interval. It was named after Siméon Denis the french
Real-world events is probably the more significant of the group; using a risk management program allows decision makers access to critical information related to potential outcomes of an event/incident. The decision makers use the information to exam the most appropriate and lower risk approach to an event/incident. The NIPP risk management program used the risk management for three specific threats, physical, cyber, and human to protect CIKRs (U.S. DHS 2009, p.33). When risk management is implemented correctly and all areas assessed thoroughly, it can produce the best course of action to protect homeland security infrastructure over a larger area through the cooperation of and between the different NIPP established sectors. Exercise planning and risk management work well together exercises also provide feedback for risk management for real-word events. Exercising the possibilities of an incident/event provide a realistic basis for establishing certain understanding of an incident without the high risk associated with a real-world
In the first place, many companies are currently on the same shape as International Produce, because they did not have a plan which can deal with confidentiality, integrity, and availability (CIA) related incidents. Not only, International Produce has no regulatory requirements that would have made incident response planning a priority, but also this company needs to understand that Incident response is not a standalone item, but must rest on a foundation of policies and an ability to properly determine what an incident is and when one has occurred. Furthermore, “The purpose of security incident response is to bring needed resources together in an organized manner to deal with an adverse event known as an “incident” that is related to the safety and or security of the information system. The security incident response process is centered on the preparation, detection and analysis, containment, investigation, eradication, recovery, and post incident activity surrounding such an incident” (Johnson, 2013). Moreover, planning and preparedness must come before the incident, but in the case of International Produce is too late since the increase in networking traffic was not perceived as problematic until it was noticed that the traffic was not coming from Mongolia to Boston but was instead traveling from Boston to Mongolia. Given these points, an incident response consultant should assist to review available resource to solve this incident, organize step to take in order to properly assess the situation, and mitigate all legal arrangements involving theft of intellectual property.
According to the journal that was written by Lui et al., “correct understanding of the user’s requirements and appropriate design decisions almost always contribute considerably to the reliability of the software.” Appendix A shows not only the importance of the specification document, but also the importance that the specification document be reviewed and evolved several times before arriving at the final formal...
Technical - A development team is currently contracted in order to assess the existing process and the system being chosen to replace it in the near future.
After playing the simulation "Managing Project Risks", we can list down the following risks under these two headers.
These are the specific risks involved to a particular project or program. The organisations continuously undertakes specific projects, which should be managed with consistency with the legal obligations to be kept in mind. There are significant program management methodology which spell out the requirement and clear risk management approach within the project environment and align by the whole of the AS/NZS ISO 31000:2009 Risk management – Principles and guidelines.
Knowledge management incorporates ideas and processes from many different sources and technologies a wide variety of...
...pkeep and improvements as dictated by occasional audits. For non-specialized results, sustainment may be the continuation of a help process. Changes in nature, client and client requirements, or engineering may incite business process change or reengineering activities to accept or reexamine the business process. Sustainment might additionally incorporate progressions to the framework dependent upon engineering headway and could be tended to through framework upgrades or upgrade activities. Constant change is a prerequisite of the sustainment stage and is inspected by distinguishing models and measures of execution, and archived in venture status audits. Change administration and quality certification is likewise a necessity in this stage to guarantee legitimate documentation of the framework setup in an exhaustive and correct way (House of Representatives 1999).
Some include risks at the enterprise level, managing risks in complex projects and dealing with turnarounds and large capital projects. Liu, Zou, & Gong (2013) explore how enterprise risk management (ERM) may influence the ability and performance of project management risk (PRM) by considering the features of the construction industry, its businesses and projects. Managing risks within projects such as these has become an important process to achieve project objectives in terms of the scope, time and cost. The results show that enterprise risk management can positively influence the implementation of project risk management. This can be achieved through implementing a risk focused culture, setting up risk management departments and setting up risk procedures. This will help control the project risk and improve the performance of project risk management. Communicating the concerns with other team members can help identify the risks earlier on rather than later in the development of the project. If the Stakeholders and managers involved are satisfied then the project outline becomes a
Identify the potential risks which affect the company and manage these risks within its risk appetite;
The project can be significantly affected as a result of two top threats. The management has to identify the risk at the beginning of the risk management planning process,
Risk Management allows us to identify the problems which are unknown during the start of the project but may occurs later. Implementing an efficient risk management plan will ensure the better outcome of the project in terms of cost and time.