Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
should the us legallize physician assisted suicide
euthanasia right to die argument
should physician assisted suicide be permissible
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: should the us legallize physician assisted suicide
To die or not to die is NOT the question for the terminally ill. The question is how to die.
The act of suicide is unpleasant and people do not like to discuss the topic but suicide happens. It is contemplated by some, especially people suffering from painful incurable diseases who wish to end their misery. The terminally ill and those with debilitating diseases should have the choice to seek help from physicians to die. But currently with only three states allowing physician assisted suicide for the terminally ill, many cannot get the support they need or access to a painless way to commit suicide. Terminal illness can create a burden on the family both emotionally by watching the loved one suffer and financially with the cost of care. If allowed to die, these burdens can be alleviated. And finally, physicians should have the legal freedom to treat their patients to the end even if it means assisting them to commit suicide. Therefore, all states should legalize physician assisted suicide permitting mentally competent patients who are terminally ill or suffering incurable unrelenting pain to choose when to die thereby ending their pain and suffering, releasing the financial and emotional burden to them and their families, and allowing physicians to follow the Hippocratic oath to care for their patients and to take a life if necessary.
In physician assisted suicide, after a request from a patient, a doctor prescribes a lethal dose of medication, making the means of death available but not participating in it. The patient then chooses whether or not to take the medication. But some patients may not kill themselves at all if they know the legal option of help from a doctor will be available if the day comes that they wan...
... middle of paper ...
...an Diego: Greenhaven Press.
Hedberg, K., & Tolle, S. (2002). Physician-assisted suicide and changes in care of the dying: The Oregon perspective. Assisted Suicide (pp. 7-9). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Oregon Death with Dignity Annual Reports. (n.d.). Oregon.gov Home Page. Retrieved July 25, 2010, from http://www.oregon.gov/DHS/ph/pas/ar-index.shtml
Palmore, E. (2001). The terminally ill should have access to assisted suicide. Terminal Illness (pp. 154-163). San Diego: Greenhaven Press.
Rogatz, P. (2003). The arguments of those opposed to assisted suicide are flawed. Suicide (pp. 119-127). San Diego: Greenhaven Press.
Steinbrook, R. (2008). Physician-Assisted Death -- From Oregon to Washington State. The New England Journal of Medicine, 359(24), 2513-5. Retrieved July 24, 2010, from ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source. (Document ID: 1611103091).
The discussion of physician-assisted suicide is frequently focused around the ethical implications. The confusion commonly surfaces from the simple question, what is physician-assisted suicide? Physician-assisted suicide can be defined as a circumstance in which a medical physician provides a lethal dose of medication to a patient with a fatal illness. In this case, the patient has given consent, as well as direction, to the physician to ethically aid in their death (Introduction to Physician-Assisted Suicide: At Issue,
“On October 27, 1997 Oregon enacted the Death with Dignity Act which allows terminally-ill Oregonians to end their lives through the voluntary self-administration of lethal medications, expressly prescribed by a physician for that purpose.” (The Oregon Health Authority, 2010). Physician assisted suicide can be constructed to have reasonable laws which still protect against its abuse and the value of human life. Recent Oregon and U.K. laws show that you can craft reasonable laws that prevent abuse and still protect the value of human life. When one thinks of suicide, we think of a person who takes their own life.
In 1994, Oregon passed the Death with Dignity Act. This law states that Oregon residents, who have been diagnosed with a life ending disease and have less than six months to live, may obtain a lethal medicine prescribed by a physician, which would end their life when and where they chose to do so. This law or act requires the collection of data from patients and physicians and publishes it in an annual r...
America is a champion of the freedom of choice. Citizens have the right to choose their religion, their political affiliation, and make personal decisions about nearly every facet of their daily lives. Despite all of these opportunities, one choice society commonly ignores is that of deciding how one’s life will end. Death seems like a highly unpredictable, uncontrollable occurrence, but for the past 17 years, citizens of Oregon have had one additional option not offered to most Americans in the deciding of their end-of-life treatment. Oregon’s Death With Dignity Act (DWDA), passed in 1994, allows qualified, terminally-ill Oregon patients to end their lives through the use of a doctor-prescribed, self-administered, lethal prescription (Office of Disease Prevention and Epidemiology, n.d.). The nationally controversial act has faced injunctions, an opposing measure, and has traveled to the Supreme Court, however it still remains in effect today.
distant cousin of euthanasia, in which a person wishes to commit suicide. feels unable to perform the act alone because of a physical disability or lack of knowledge about the most effective means. An individual who assists a suicide victim in accomplishing that goal may or may not be held responsible for. the death, depending on local laws. There is a distinct difference between euthanasia and assisted suicide. This paper targets euthanasia; pros and cons. not to be assisted in suicide. & nbsp; Thesis Argument That Euthanasia Should Be Accepted & nbsp;
There are only three states that allow physician-assisted suicide: Washington, Oregon, and Montana. Oregon became the first by enacting the Death with Dignity Act which allows terminally-ill patients to end their lives through the voluntary self-administration of lethal medications, expressly prescribed by a physician for that purpose. (Oregon.gov) In November of 2008 Washington became the second and in December of the same year Montana agreed and became the third. A poll was given to Oregon physicians in 1999, nurses, and social workers in 2001. The majority of physicians 51% supported the death with dignity act, 48% of nurses were in favor, and 72% of social workers were in support. (Miller) These polls clearly show that the majority of voters are in support of Physician assisted suicide.
In conclusion, all should firmly believe that physician assisted suicide should not be legalized in any state. Although it is legalized in Oregon it is not wise for any other state to follow that example. By now, all should strongly believe the growing public support for PAS still remains a very dangerous trend. The role of our physician is that of a healer, not a killer. It must be understood that in some cases the only way to relieve someone from their pain is to let them go. On the contrary, each human life has an
Markoff, Steven. “State by-State Guide to Physician Assisted Suicide” ProCon.org. 13 December 2013, 30 March 2014.
The approach of physician-assisted suicide respects an individual’s need for personal dignity. It does not force the terminally ill patient to linger hopelessly, and helplessly, often at great cost to their psyche. It drive’s people mad knowing they are going to die in a short period of time, suffering while they wait in a hospital bed.
"Legalized Physician-Assisted Suicide in Oregon ñ The Second Year." Amy D. Sullivan, Katrina Hedberg, David W. Fleming. The New England Journal of Medicine. February 24, 2000. v.342, n.8
Cotton, Paul. "Medicine's Position Is Both Pivotal And Precarious In Assisted Suicide Debate." The Journal of the American Association 1 Feb. 1995: 363-64.
Thesis Statement: Physician assisted suicide or euthanasia may offer an accelerated and pain relieved alternative to end someone’s suffering, therefore people should not be denied the right to die especially when faced with terminal illnesses.
Physician-assisted suicide refers to the physician acting indirectly in the death of the patient -- providing the means for death.
So what options are out there? You are a terminally ill patient drowning in debt and unable to pay the bills. But, you have a choice to stop the treatments that have no significant effect on you, or do you keep suffering? So let’s say you decide to end this agony, you know the inevitable is coming, but you want to take charge of your own death. Although the state you live in does not support your decision and only gives the option of lying in your death bed on life support. This research paper examines, if assisted suicide should be allowed in all states? Within this essay, will be points about why someone would choose to end their life, what states have legalized assisted suicide, pros and cons, and why this topic should be more talked about. Evidence will be gathered from, written sources. Sources that will likely be scholarly-reviewed journals, magazine articles and other articles from a religious viewpoint along with a doctor, family, and the patient’s viewpoint. The public should be more informed of the pros and cons to assisted suicide and which one has the greatest benefit for the patient and their families.
It has been argued that it should be made legal for patients to have doctor-assisted suicide, or mercy-killing, which is the term used to describe ending life through the voluntary self-administration of lethal medication, expressly prescribed by a physician for that purpose (DHS-Internet). By approximately a two-to-one ratio, most adults in the US agree that it should be this way. “When read a brief description of the Oregon proposition, allowing physician-assisted suicide for patients who are thought to have less than six months to live, a 61% to 34% majority said that they would favor such a law in their state”(Harris # 2). However, I myself feel, that it shouldn’t be approved for several reasons: this matter does not belong upon human beings to decide; physicians and family members, rather than patients are likely to be the real decision makers; terminally ill patients are not sufficiently conscious to make end-of-life decisions.