Essay PreviewMore ↓
The second amendment states “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” The Founding Fathers included this in the Bill of Rights because they feared the Federal Government might oppress the population if the people did not have the means to defend themselves as a nation or individuals.
“We established however some, although not all its (self-government) important principles. The
constitutions of most of our states assert, that all power is inherent in the people; that they
exercise it by themselves, in all cases to which they think themselves competent; (as in
electing their functionaries executive and legislative, and deciding by a jury of themselves, in
all judiciary cases in which any fact is involved,) or may they act by representatives, freely and
equally chosen that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed” (Jefferson).
It is believed that The Founding Fathers thought that the society benefited from guns being in the hands of the people. This way all citizens were able to defend themselves at all times.
The government has passed many laws regarding the ownership and use of firearms. Currently the federal law states the following: The use of any firearm in a violent or drug trafficking crime is punishable by law. A person who wishes to purchase a firearm must be 18 years of age to purchase a rifle or shot gun and a person must be 21 years of age to purchase a hand gun. Regarding travel, notwithstanding any state or local law, a person shall be entitled to transport a firearm from any place where they may lawfully possess and transport such firearm if the firearm is unloaded and in the trunk.
How to Cite this Page
"The Right to Bear Arms." 123HelpMe.com. 18 Nov 2019
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- The Second Amendment and the Right to Bear Arms The Second Amendment to the Constitution gave United States citizens the right to bear arms. Although, the Second Amendment stated: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms. However, the framers could not foresee the type of violence we have in our cities today. Innocent citizens have and are being brutally killed due to this amendment. Stricter gun control laws must be enacted to receive these types of weapons.... [tags: Constituton Bill Rights Right To Bear Arms]
1235 words (3.5 pages)
- The Second Amendment Few issues incite americans more than the issue of rising crime and violence. This problem can easily be linked to the availability of guns."The debate over whether guns are a hallowed tradition and a right guaranteed by the Second Ammendment of the U.S.constitution or whether they are a fearful danger contributing to crime and violence." ("gun control") Due to the outbreak of violence in our society, some people feel that repealing the Second Ammendment would solve the problem.... [tags: Constituton Bill Rights Right To Bear Arms]
1557 words (4.4 pages)
- The United States Constitution says that U.S. Citizens have the right to bear arms. Even though this guarantee was written with no constraints, there are now laws that limit certain aspects of gun ownership. The reasons for gun control fall under the flag of public safety. Though there are many safety reasons why private ownership of firearms should be banned, these arguments are outweighed not only by the need for protection, but because the limitation of ownership rights could become dangerous to personal freedom.... [tags: 2nd Amendment Constitution The Right To Bear Arms]
2373 words (6.8 pages)
- We All Have a Right to Bear Arms The preamble of the United States Constitution clearly states its objective: to establish justice, insure domestic tranquillity, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity The bill of rights is the set of amendments to the constitution intended to secure these objectives for the individual citizens of the United States. The second amendment states: A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.... [tags: Constituton Bill Rights Right To Bear Arms]
1428 words (4.1 pages)
- “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the securing of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” Those are the words of the seconds amendment to the Constitution of the United States. These words were written by the man who laid the foundation of our government today. As a constitutional right our government has no right to take away our right to concealed carry. The government may mean good by doing this, but will this really help, or only create more problems.... [tags: Anti Gun Control Essays]
609 words (1.7 pages)
- The Right to Bear Arms People argue the right of the Second Amendment all the time. Some people think that guns should not be a given right and that we do not deserve to own them. Most liberals think that outlawing guns will lower the crime rate in America. My question to you is when was the last time a gun that was involved in a crime was legally purchased by the person committing the crime. In most cases, a robbery or crime is committed with a stolen gun. Stolen weapons are harder to trace to the criminal.... [tags: Firearm, Gun politics in the United States]
895 words (2.6 pages)
- Do you know what the second amendment is. Or do you just know the simplest definition. The second amendment is simply defined as the right to bear arms. In further definition, the right to bear arms gives you the right to own a gun but restrains where you can take it and what type it is. First, one of the rights that is restricted is who can own a firearm. The Lewis V. The United States case is related to this restricted right because it is involved with gun ownership. Lewis was accused of a brake light entering with the intent of misdemeanor.... [tags: Fourth Ammendment to the US Constitution]
559 words (1.6 pages)
- The Right to Bear Arms The United States holds five percent of the world’s population, yet thirty-one percent of the world’s public mass shootings (Christensen). Yes, legislation for stricter gun laws is discussed after each devastating shooting; however, the Second Amendment prevents any effective legislation from being passed. Eventually, the talk of new laws diminishes, leaving the number of mass shootings in America tremendously high. Because of the right to bear arms, gun laws remain loose, and American citizens continue to be murdered; therefore, Congress needs to amend the Second Amendment to restrict the right to bear arms and enable stricter gun laws to be passed.... [tags: Firearm, United States]
859 words (2.5 pages)
- The memorable Benjamin Franklin once said, “Those who surrender freedom for security will not have, nor do they deserve, either one.” The right to bear arms is a right given to us by our founding fathers in the second amendment of our Bill of Rights. With acts of terrorism threatening nations worldwide, security becomes a factor of essence in the laws of a country. Some people call for the restriction of guns and gun-related products in order to promote security by disarming the people. Others have called for quite the opposite, arm your people by giving them the liberty to protect themselves so they can help first before the government can.... [tags: Firearm, Gun]
983 words (2.8 pages)
- The Second Amendment And The Right To Bear Arms Throughout the years there has been an ongoing debate over the Second Amendment and how it should be interpreted. The issue that is being debated is whether our government has the right to regulate guns. The answer of who has which rights lies within how one interprets the Second Amendment. With this being the case, one must also think about what circumstances the Framers were under when this Amendment was written. There are two major sides to this debate, one being the collective side, which feels that the right was given for collective purposes only.... [tags: Gun Bear Arms Control Essays Debate]
2184 words (6.2 pages)
The rational given for most modern gun control legislation is “Crime Control.” The Brady Bill is one example. The Brady Bill is named after James Brady, who was shot by John Hinckley during an assassination attempt on President Regan in 1981. Supporters of the Brady Bill used that incident to gain support for their gun control legislation, claiming it would reduce crime and save lives. The fact is that the background check and waiting period included in the Brady Bill would not have prevented John Hinckley from legally purchasing the handgun used in the incident. Records show that “a police background was run on Hinckley four days before he purchased the revolver he used to shoot President Reagan and Jim Brady. The check shoed he had no felony convictions in any jurisdiction. Neither had Hinckley any public record of mental illness” (“Guns” 51).
An even greater shortcoming of the Brady Bill is that is only affects legal transaction. By definition, a criminal is someone who breaks the law. Criminals have many ways to obtain weapons without going through the process mandated by the Brady Bill, which states that anyone wanting to purchase a firearm must wait five days for a background check to be completed. Two obvious examples are theft and black market purchases. According to studies “only one firearm of every six used in crime is obtained legally” (Thomas). Since the passage of the Brady Bill, only four felons have been apprehended trying to purchase a firearm (National Institute of Justice).
The Brady Bill is not effective in fighting crime, but is does affect crime victims. The five-day waiting period during which the police conduct the background check is also supposed to serve as a “cooling off” period to prevent crimes of passion. Fortunately, this five-day wait is waived in states like Virginia which have an instant background check system in place. The following article is an example of how waiting periods affect the victims of crime:
Marine Cpl. Rayna Ross of Woodridge, Virginia, might be dead if a waiting period had been in effect. Instead, the instant check system in place in Virginia allowed her to purchase a firearm and defend her life against a former boyfriend three days after she purchased the pistol. The man, a marine under orders to stay away from Ross because of previous assaults and threats, broke through a door and rushed in her bedroom with a bayonet. Ross fired twice, mortally wounding him. The shooting was ruled to be a case of self- defense. (Armed Citizen)
Violence in America seems to go back and forth from better to worse all the time. One day crime rates are up and then the next they are down and America is becoming safer. In 2005, 11,346 persons were killed by firearm violence 477,040 persons were victims of a crime committed with a firearm. (National Institute of Justice) Surprisingly, a lot of gun violence in America is related to self defense. Between 1987 and 1990 it was found that guns were used in defense during a crime incident 64,615 times annually. This equates to two times out of 1,000 incidents (0.2%) that occurred in this time frame. For violent crimes (assault, robbery and rape) guns were used 0.83% of the time in self-defense. In 20% of the self defense incidents, the guns were used by police officers (Wikipedia).
Statistics show that people who are attacked by a criminal are safer if they use a weapon
to resist their attacker than if they do not resist. In addition, those who resist with a gun
are less likely to be injured than those who use a less effective weapon, such as a knife
(Quigley 14). Resisting crime with a gun does not always mean shooting the criminal.
Statistics show that in true life instances of self-defense with firearms, firing the gun was
necessary only one third to one half of the time (13), the rest of the time the mere
presence of a gun was enough to scare away the attacker.
Gun violence will never go away; Americans will be dealing with gun crimes for a long time to come. Americans must try to remember the facts. The Founding Fathers of this country won freedom with firearms. After they won independence the Founding Fathers included the right to keep and bear arms in the Constitution to ensure that the freedom they fought for would last. Throughout the history of this country firearms have been used to defend that freedom from both foreign
aggressors and from violent criminal aggressors. (Quigley) Americans own and use firearms for
many reasons, such as; hunting, organized sports competitions, informal recreational uses,
and for protection. If Americans no longer have the constitutional right to bear arms because of stricter gun laws, this will not save lives.
"Armed Citizen." American Rifleman (1993).
"Federal Gun Laws." 2008. National Rifle Association of America. 2 October 2008
"Guns, Bias and the Evening News." American Rifleman (2005): 50-51.
Jefferson, Thomas. "Memorial Edition." Lipsome and Berg. L , 1824.
National Institute of Justice. 16 June 2008. 28 September 2008
Quigley, Paxton. Armed and Female . New York: St. Martins, 2001.
Thomas, Andrew Peyton. Crime and the Sacking of America: The roots of chaos. Washington: 1994.
Wikipedia. January 2008. 27 September 2008