Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Review on organizational theories
organization theory perspectives
organizational theory multiple perspectives
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Review on organizational theories
This paper is part of the project required for Organization Theory (OT). The author of this paper will briefly review the three OT perspectives, identify and introduce a company to be studied, select two of three OT perspectives for analyzing the targeted company, discuss the methodological differences between the two selected perspectives, and reveal the major variables that contribute to the effectiveness of the targeted organization. This paper serves as a frame work for the final project (term paper) of OT course.
Review of Organization Theory Perspectives
There are three predominant perspectives in the study of Organization Theory (OT): modern, symbolic interpretive, and postmodern. Each of these perspectives comes with its own concepts and methodologies.
Modernists believe that organizations are objectively real entities operating in a real world. “When well-designed and managed they are systems of decision and action driven by norms of rationality, efficiency and effectiveness for stated purposes” (Hatch & Cunliffe, 2006, p. 14). Symbolic-interpretivists assert that “we cannot know an external or objective existence apart from our subjective awareness of it” (Hatch & Cunliffe, 2006, p. 14). They think organization are continually constructed and reconstructed by their members through symbolically mediated interaction. “Organizations are socially constructed realities where meanings promote and are promoted by understanding of the self and others that occurs within the organizational context” (Hatch & Cunliffe, 2006, p. 14). Postmodernists think organizations are sites for enacting power relations, oppression, irrationality, communicative distortion, or arenas of fun and playful irony. “Organizations are texts produced b...
... middle of paper ...
...rn, Symbolic, and Postmodern Perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.
Keller, R. T. (1994). Technology-information processing fit and the performance of R&D project groupts: A test of contingency theory. Academy of Management Journal, 37(1), 167-246.
SAIC. (2009). SAIC annual report Retrieved November 20, 2010, from http://www.annualreports.com/HostedData/AnnualReports/PDFArchive/sai2009.pdf
SAIC. (n.d.). About SAIC Retrieved November 20, 2010 from http://www.saic.com/about/
Scribd. (n.d.). Organizational effectiveness Retrieved January 28, 2011, from http://www.scribd.com/doc/22576423/ORGANIZATIONAL-EFFECTIVENESS
Smith, M., Busi, M., Ball, P., & Meer, R. V. D. (2008). Factors influencing an organisation’s ability to manage innovation: A structured literature review and conceptual model. International Journal of Innovation Management, 12(4), 655-676.
organization: it goes beyond that. It is a concept, a people's movement, an idea. The concept of
Bolman, L. G. & Deal, T. E. (2013). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (2013). Reframing Organizations (5th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Boje, D. M. , Luhman, J. T. , and Cunliffe, A. L. “ A Dialectic Perspective on the Organization
A society of organizations is one in which organizations enter our lives as influential forces in a great many ways — in how we work, what we eat, how we get educated and cured of our illnesses, how we get entertained, and how our ideas are shaped’ (Henry Mintzberg 1989)
Each organizational element relates to one another. They have a building block effect where each element depends on the one before it in order to exist. The "organizational efforts (inputs and processes) contribute to organizational results (products and outputs) and these contribute to societal consequences and payoffs (outcomes)" (Strategic Planning in Education, 23).
Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (2008). Reframing organizations. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.
Gibson, J.L., Ivancevich, J.M., Donnelly, J.H., & Konopaske, R. (2009). Organizations: Behaviors, structure, processes (13th ed.) New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Most organizations fall under one of three organizational designs: simple structure, bureaucracy and matrix structure. The organizational design of a company suggests who makes executive decisions and how they are enforced. The organizational design is typically decided based on the size of the company and market place.
Organizations can be configured in many different ways. Their overall classifications can be summarized by characteristics of complexity within the system, the level of formalization, and the centralization of decision-making power. The structure of each organization is influenced by many factors. Such factors include; the goods and services provided, the overall individuality of the staff providing the service and producing the products. The overall beliefs and values of the individuals performing the services that are being delivered, the technology that is utilized to help deliver the services and aid in product production, as well as the needs, desires, and generalized characteristics of the consumer population that requires or demand the product or service. (Yoder-Wise, 2007, p. 145) The organization will have different operating priorities based on its ownership. The main goal behind most business is to make money. The private owned institution strives to make its shareholders money, while a non-profit institution reinvests all of its revenue back into the orga...
Organisational theorists, depending on their school of thought, hold differing conceptions of organisational culture. Most theorists attempt to use a variety of metaphors, or images, to bound, frame, and differentiate that category of experience referred to as an “organisation” (Smircich, 1983). The most common comparisons made of organisations
When studying organizational theory, two different belief systems help to determine which theory stream that each individual person follows. These are a person’s ontological beliefs or epistemological beliefs. It is important to recognize how both Ontology and Epistemology apply to organizational theory, and for each person to decide where they fit inside these branches.
Jones, G. R. (2010). Organizational theory, design, and change. 6th Ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall
According to Hatch and Cunliffe (2006), there are three major perspectives about the study of organization theory (OT): modern, symbolic interpretive, and postmodern. Each of these perspectives comes with its own assumptions and methodologies. Hatch and Cunliffe provided an introduction text about the concepts and characteristics of the three OT perspectives. Tsoukas and Knudsen also compiled a comprehensive handbook summarizing all facets of the meta-theoretical perspectives. In this post the writer will discuss the basic concepts of three perspectives, present Hatch and Cunliffe’s reasons why a multiple perspectives approach to organization theory is important, and compare Tsoukas and Knudsen’s introduction to the Hatch and Cunliffe introduction in their books.
Organizations must operate within structures that allow them to perform at their best within their given environments. According to theorists T. Burns and G.M Stalker (1961), organizations require structures that will allow them to adapt and react to changes in the environment (Mechanistic vs Organic Structures, 2009). Toyota Company’s corporate structure is spelt out as one where the management team and employees conduct operations and make decisions through a system of checks and balances.