This chapter's main idea is that the study of economics is the study of incentives. We find a differentiation between economic incentives, social incentives and moral incentives. Incentives are described in a funny way as "means of urging people to do more of a good thing or less of a bad thing", and in this chapter we find some examples public school teachers in Chicago, sumo wrestling in Japan, take care center in Israel and Paul Feldman's bagel business of how incentives drive people and most of the time the conventional wisdom turns to be "wrong" when incentives are in place.
I definitely agree with this, while reading this I could think of several examples that take place in Mexico's daily life, and this is a clever explanation for them: Policemen corruption. It is not that policemen are bad people or that they don't have morals, it is that the monetary incentive is strong enough so that they prefer to "cheat" and profit more from corruption than what they would earn by their monthly wage.
Within this discussion it is explained that incentives sometimes lead to cheating, because "something worth having is something worth cheating for". I think the incentives placed in daily life those that we can control, let's say, in our business should be established wisely, in order ...
... middle of paper ...
...ifferent, children names are predictors of their success/failure because of its connection with his parents, and the cycle that names do through low to high socioeconomic classes. All these trends brought up by economic analysis turn interesting specially when they are supported by statistical data but they are also examined through cause/effect like the raising question: is black culture a merely reflection of the economic gap between white and black people or has it caused the gap between them?
From my point of view this findings are surprising and hard to believe but they make sense. Though I think the author gets radical about this regarding some post he has made on his website's blog about middle name Wayne characterizing criminals . I guess we can find so much strange coincidences but it is important to determine the causes of them, if there are consistent.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- "Anybody living in the United States in the early 1990s and paying even a whisper of attention to the nightly news or a daily paper could be forgiven for having been scared out of his skin... The culprit was crime. It had been rising relentlessly - a graph plotting the crime rate in any American city over recent decades looked like a ski slope in profile... Death by gunfire, intentional and otherwise, had become commonplace, So too had carjacking and crack dealing, robbery, and rape. Violent crime was a gruesome and constant companion...... [tags: Steven Levitt]
1509 words (4.3 pages)
- Analysis Freakonomics tries to turn the scalpel of the analytical and statistical methods intrinsic to Economics onto questions that the authors feel do not have definitive answers. Mostly because no one thought to ask the questions that would allow us (the world at large, not Economics students) to solve the problems that would lead to the answers, the authors feel. Because of this, Freakonomics is attended by all the problems of the so-called soft sciences. The data, and the conclusions often seem susceptible to multiple interpretations.... [tags: book analysis and review]
1287 words (3.7 pages)
- Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner’s book Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything has gained a lot of attention for its ability merge economics with pop culture. The book majorly focuses on noting that mainly entails with studying incentives. Levitt is professionally qualified to apply economics in different life incidences, which are described in the articles found in the book. The discussion below is a detailed review of this book. It would be hard to believe that a book containing information on the doctrines involved in economics would be an instant success especially in the mainstream.... [tags: Freakonomics, Steven Levitt, Stephen J. Dubner]
870 words (2.5 pages)
- The book” Freakonomics” is by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner. The title, “Freakonomics”, is a combination of two words: Freak (which means quirky, unusual, or weird) and economics, but in the sense of economic related to economic activity; the economics that consumer, families and businesses encounter every day. The title reflects the author’s name of the method of economic analysis in aspects of everyday life that normally fall outside the scope of the work of economists. The author’s success is due to the fact that this is a fun book to read, with a little dose of humor.... [tags: freakonomics, steven levitt, economics]
1120 words (3.2 pages)
- Freakonomics has been an incredibly interesting read and opens up with, what appears to the reader to be, a writing style that somehow personifies the text in a way that only the book itself can articulate. The authors, Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner, do an amazing job describing basic economic concepts and rules using intriguing and nontypical examples all while entertaining facts and figures that leave the reader with a dropped jaw. The economist, Levitt, received his bachelors degree in economics from Harvard University, his Ph.D.... [tags: Supply and demand, Economics, Freakonomics]
716 words (2 pages)
- Economics in reverse is the best way of describing the unconventional method preferred by economist, Steven D. Levitt. While most economists measure social situations and present the data as numbers and graphs Levitt takes anomalies within the data to reveal truths obscured. It’s Levitt’s sociological take on economics that has set him apart from his peers with his heavy focus on incentives, choices, and the consequences they have. Freakonomics mirrors Levitt’s method since it’s a collection of stories he has uncovered or read, and the core economic principles are hidden within each story throughout the book, sometimes even in plain sight like how there are exactly as many chapte... [tags: Freakonomics Essays]
1570 words (4.5 pages)
- Super Freakonomics is a book written to uncover hidden agendas by challenging the mind of the reader. In the book, each chapter has a new question that then is investigated into and throughout the chapter is really explained and what they believe the truth to be is revealed. When assigned this book, only 3 of the chapters were read and those chapters are “Why should suicide bombers buy life insurance?” (57), “The fix is in – and it’s cheap and simple,” (133) and “What do Al Gore and Mount Pinatubo have in common?” (165).... [tags: Freakonomics, Steven Levitt, SuperFreakonomics]
1283 words (3.7 pages)
- Chapter 1: In the novel of Freakonomics written by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner, it clearly shows how economic incentives in our society would make a usual honest person decide to commit the act of cheating. If that person comes across the thought of cheating, it usually is for a personal well being. By that I mean they are obviously doing it for an important reason because normally they would never think about committing an act that is morally wrong. The two groups in the chapter that I feel have the most similar qualities were the teachers and the sumo wrestlers.... [tags: Freakonomics, Steven Levitt, SuperFreakonomics]
1767 words (5 pages)
- The book “Freakonomics” by Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner is a dissection of anecdotes. The authors intensely dismantle ideas that are social norms, using economic and demographic data. The book has no central theme other than to “explore the hidden side of… everything.”pg.14 One chapter the subject will be on corruption in the sumo wrestling community, then another on how legalizing abortion lowers crime rates, then another on what effect parenting has on children. Chapter three explains why the popular idea that most drug dealers were rich is almost entirely false.... [tags: Freakonomics, Steven Levitt]
1106 words (3.2 pages)
- Renowned economist, Steven D. Levitt, and well-known journalist, Stephen J. Dubner, in their collaboration of the book, Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything, write in a mostly inoffensive style about extremely controversial topics. Levitt’s and Dubner’s purpose is to inform readers of frequently disputed topics from a purely economic standpoint. They use second person to directly speak to their readers, an impartial tone to show an unusual perspective, and contrast to provide both sides of an argument.... [tags: Freakonomics, Steven Levitt, Stephen J. Dubner]
1067 words (3 pages)