Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Merits and demerits of democracy
Merits and demerits of democracy
Merits and demerits of democracy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Merits and demerits of democracy
Research Summaries
Log 3
RESEARCH QUESTION: Are democracies the best form of government for developing countries to prosper?
CITATION
Casas, Jose, Pardo and Schwartz, Pedro. “Public Choice and the Challenges of Democracy.” Edward Elgar Publishing, 2007.
SUMMARY
In this book, Casas and Schwartz explain that democracy is not the best of form of governance that developing countries should have. The authors explain that some countries have been able to achieve developmental success without being accountable to the democratic institutions. According to the text, Singapore has been able to achieve successful development under autocracy governance system. The government of Singapore developed paternalistic restrictions on the behavior of individuals in order to implement social control. The government also used the industrial policy such as directed credit in order to guide and control investment. The paternalistic regulation was very extensive in Singapore because the government could restrain individuals from making personal choices. However, the government used social control mainly to emphasize self-discipline and education. The book explains that high economic growth was also achieved in South Korea and Taiwan, which used to practice autocracy governance more than democracy. High economic growth occurred in China because of income inequality and regional diversity, rather than competing political parties of diversity. Autocracy has advantage over democracy because majority of the voters would reject policies that result in growth but do not distribute benefits equally. Therefore, the government will be able to pursue such policies in autocracy governance.
RELEVANCE...
... middle of paper ...
...rce is relevant to my research question because it explains that democracy is an important factor necessary to realize change in the Arab countries. According to the author, democracy can develop self-sufficient social contract that can serve the interests of citizens effectively. The book is useful to many people, especially the students pursuing in political science because it contains information concerning the political issues affecting the Arab countries. The book has raised awareness in me concerning the significant effect of technology as a change agent. The author has supported his argument by reviewing various academic sources, thus making the information credible. However, the book also has a weakness because the author has not carried out study to determine the relationship between democracy and the effective use of the four dynamics in bringing change.
Schiller, W. J., Geer, J. G., & Segal, J. A. (2013). Gateways to democracy: introduction to American government, the essentials. (2nd ed.). Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth ;.
Print Shea, Daniel M. Living Democracy. Boston: Pearson Learning Solutions, 2013. Print. Weglyn, Mich. :.
Berry, Jeffrey. Goldman, Jerry (2008). The Challenge of Democracy (9th ed.). Boston; New York: Houghton Mifflin Company. Linder, Doug (2007).
Heath, Joseph. "The democracy deficit in Canada." University of Toronto. homes.chass.utoronto.ca/~jheath/democracy.pdf (accessed October 17, 2013).
Dye, T. R., Zeigler, H., & Schubert, L. (2012). The Irony of Democracy (15th ed.).
Landy, Marc and Sidney M. Milkis. American Government: Balancing Democracy and Rights. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2004.
Larry Johnston (2008) Politics: An Introduction to the Modern Democratic State, Third Edition, Chapters 2, 3, 7, 8 and 9.
Kyi Suu San Aung. "The Quest of Democracy." Reading The World: Ideas That Matter, edited
Hoffman, J. & Graham, P. (2009), Introduction to Political Theory, 2nd Edition: London: Pearson Education Limited.
Landy, Marc and Sidney M. Milkis. American Government: Balancing Democracy and Rights. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2004.
As the Arab Spring enters its second year, major uprisings and revolts have occurred all over the Middle East, pushing for an end to the corrupt autocratic rule and an expansion of civil liberties and political rights. Most recently, images from Syria have emerged, depicting the government’s use of force to suppress the voice of its people. One might ask, “Is this the beginning of a revolution? Is the country on the path to democracy?” To assess this question and examine the future trends in the region, one must look back on the country’s somewhat tumultuous history, the relationship between the citizens and the state, and the political economy.
There have been enormous efforts to spread democracy as a political system throughout the world by the developed democratic countries and the international development organizations including the World Bank. By the late 1990s the United States alone spent over a half billion dollars to promote democratic expansion throughout the world (Diamond, 2003). These were done considering that the democratic system leads towards development. As a result in the late 20th century we saw a huge political transformation towards democracy. During the last few decades a huge number of countries adopted democracy as their political system. However, it retain a big question how far democracy is successful in bringing development of a country? At this stage, some people also criticizes the effort of democratization arguing that it is done without considering the context of a country, sometimes democracy is not ideal for all countries and it is an effort to extinct diversity of political system. In studying the literature regarding the debate, we found a paradoxical relationship between democracy and development. Some argue that democracy has failed to ensure expected outcomes in terms of development. While others confronted that democracy has a considerable impact on development. Another group of people argue that form of political system actually does not have any impact on development process. On the verge of these debates, some development institutions and academics throw light on why democracy is not working properly, and what measure should be taken to make it more successful in bringing effective development of developing countries. Consequently, this writing is an effort of revisiting the different views about impact of democra...
Wiarda H. J. and Skelley E. M., 2005, Dilemmas of Democracy in Latin America: Crises and Opportunity, Rowman and Littlefield Publishers Inc
A memorable expression said by President Abraham Lincoln reads, “Democracy is government of the people, by the people, and for the people”. Democracy, is a derived from the Greek term "demos" which means people. It is a successful, system of government that vests power to the public or majority. Adopted by the United States in 1776, a democratic government has six basic characteristics: (i) established/elected sovereignty (where power and civic responsibility are exercised either directly by the public or their freely agreed elected representative(s)), (ii) majority rule(vs minority), (iii) (protects one’s own and reside with) human rights, (iv) regular free and fair elections to citizens (upon a certain age), (v) responsibility of
Throughout history different types of instrumental regimes have been in tact so civilizations remained structured and cohesive. As humanity advanced, governments obligingly followed. Although there have been hiccups from the ancient times to modern day, one type of government, democracy, has proven to be the most effective and adaptive. As quoted by Winston Churchill, democracy is the best form of government that has existed. This is true because the heart of democracy is reliant, dependent, and thrives on the populaces desires; which gives them the ability for maintaining the right to choose, over time it adjusts and fixes itself to engulf the prominent troubling issues, and people have the right of electing the person they deem appropriate and can denounce them once they no longer appease them. In this paper, the benefits of democracy are outlined, compared to autocratic communism, and finally the flaws of democracy are illustrated.