Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Methods used to conduct research
Methods used to conduct research
Methods used to conduct research
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
1) Research (McMillan, 2012, pp. 5)
a. Research is the process in which data in collected and then observed and explained.
b. Research is an important foundation in everyone’s life not just my work. It will be useful to my field because it helps me gain some background knowledge on new techniques that other people have tried and gives me insight on maybe things that aren’t as successful with students who have disabilities which I can then stay away from.
2) Scientific (McMillan, 2012, pp. 5)
a. Scientific approach is someone being as neutral as they humanly can be. They must follow the code of ethics and not without any information and all their data must be supported by something that can be tested or researched.
b. This is important to be because I know that no one can be completely objective but to be able to follow the scientific approach as closely as possible
…show more content…
7)
a. Empirical research is something that you can use your 5 senses to experience it is physically there and can be observed.
b. This is an important type of research because it delivers facts that can be shared with the students. These facts are learned and can be tested with in the class over and over again so the students may become interested in research themselves. It is an easier type of research to introduce to students that will give observable results and feedback.
4) Theory (McMillan, 2012, pp. 7)
a. Theory research explains relationships between things that are often not seen. Most of these relationships are intrinsic or based of feelings and thoughts.
b. This type of research is important in my field because if I am doing studies on different teaching styles I will be able to observe classroom participation, and classwork completion.
5) Generalizability (McMillan, 2012, pp. 10)
a. Generalizability is being able to use the information that is collected in one research and seeing if you would be able to apply the findings/results with other groups of
Esterberg’s discussion of the connection between theory and data says that in order to carry out qualitative research you need to use inductive reason. Deductive reasoning is the opposite approach inductive reasoning which correlates with quantitative research. When looking at deductive research you begin with creating a theory that you want to test by creating a hypothesis and picking a sample to study. Looking at inductive reasoning you begin with analyzing the world around you and strategize different characteristics to form a theory. To me theory means reasoning’s to test something to find answers. I believe it helps us understand the world around us better but making correlations between two different things.
A theory can lead to the development of a model which provides a visual representation and explanation of the scientists’ understanding. A model can assist in predicting what could happen if a particular incident occurs. An example of a model is the Niels Bohr model of the atom.
Willis, J. (2008). Research-based strategies to ignite student learning: Insights from a neurologist and classroom teacher. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development.
There are many definitions to theory. According to Akers (2009) “theories are tentative answers to the commonly asked questions about events and behavior” (Akers, (2009, p. 1). Theory is a set of interconnect statements that explain how two or more things are related in two casual fashions, based upon a confirmed hypotheses and established multiple times by disconnected groups of researchers.
Having satisfied this researchers then make epistemological assumptions surrounding the subject matter. They must decide on the type of evidence to be collected, considering which evidence will deliver optimum validity. They must decide which stance to take during research, objective or neutral, considering which would be possible or even favourable. They must then think about how this can be best achieved. Should the research be classified as 'scientific' or 'unscientific' and what determines this?
The scientific method is the analyzation of evidence, to examine a case from every angle possible, to not give up on an investigation until all of the angles are covered and to not allow personal emotions create a bias in their mind (Osterburg 2010). A scientific method example would be when an investigator arrives to a crime scene, they would first search the area for clues and see if something doesn’t seem right. Next they would have to search for different forms of evidence, most important would be trace evidence because it can provide DNA evidence which can also link a suspect to the crime. There are many more ways evidence and other clues can be harvested from a crime scene but it is up to the investigator to use their knowledge and help find the person responsible for the crime
Research is defined as systematic investigation in order to establish facts and reach new conclusions (OUP, 2014). The biopsychosocial model has already been described.
Research kids-based learning, in my opinion, would create value with the school system because even though the foundations are the same, the way we learn is consistently evolving daily. Under unit three it is stated that some lawmakers have a "strong sense of obligation to give children a good start in life many citizens see the un-benign neglect of children as a crisis" (Medina, 2008, p. 192). The validity of the research kids-based learning is very significant to the educational system, furthermore, it helps create better learning situations for everyone that needs it. The research that is conducted on how the students learn is significant because it is important to know if the present system work moreover updated with the time periods.
Traditional research has broad topic, in contrast to action research that has a specific topic in a specific classroom, school or school district. This paper addressed both traditional and action research, their features and their influence on education. Within the paper there were comparisons between quantitative, qualitative, and action research and how they may be used within the school setting. As a result, educators and researcher can conduct research that may be used to make efficient and effective decisions to make positive changes.
Basic research is mainly concerned with generalizations and the formulation of theory. It is driven by curiosity or interest in a subject. The main motivation is to expand man’s knowledge, not to create or invent something. Many scientists believe that basic research
In chapter one quantitative research and qualitative research is discussed. Quantitative research is collecting data that is in forms of numbers or is converted into numbers. This type of research would be conducted through tests rating scores, etc. There are four different types of studies that could result in quantitative research. Descriptive studies is when it enables researchers to draw conclusions about the current state of affairs regarding issues, but not about correlation or cause –and- effect relationship. This describes a situation that gives information about characteristics of students, teachers, and schools (Ellis, 2013, p. 6). Correlational studies is research that explores possible associations among two or more variables.
Research philosophy, refers to the development of knowledge adopted by the researchers in their research (Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill, 2009). In other words, it is the theory that used to direct the researcher for conducting the procedure of research design, research strategy, questionnaire design and sampling (Malhotra, 2009). It is very important to have a clear understanding of the research philosophy so that we could examine the assumptions about the way we view the world, which are contained in the research philosophy we choose, knowing that whether they are appropriate or not (Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill, 2009). According to Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill (2009), three major ways of thinking about research philosophy are examined: ontology, epistemology and axiology. Each of them carries significant differences which will have an impact on the way we consider the research procedures. Ontology, “is concerned with nature of reality”, while epistemology “concerns what constitutes acceptable knowledge in a field of study and axiology “studies judgements about value” (Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill, 2009, p110, p112, p116). This study is intent on creating some “facts” from objective evaluations which are made by the subjects. Therefore, epistemology will be chosen for this study as the way of thinking about the research philosophy.
The first dimension, which is relevant to our study, is that of empirical versus non-empirical studies. Empirical studies involve observing and measuring reality, thereby confirming knowledge through direct experience. Non-empirical (theoretical) studies involve developing and exploring theories that account for given data.
The Importance and Appropriateness of Utilizing Different Methodologies for Research. Introduction The process of research entails the logical as well as systematic search for useful data and information with regard to a specific topic (Jha, 2008). It is also comprised of the investigation of the best, most cost effective and appropriate solutions to both social and scientific issues, following an objective and logical analysis. Jha, (2008) defines research as the search for knowledge and the discovery of the truth. During this process, the data can be gathered from a wide pool of sources among them interviews, books, nature among others.The data can then be analyzed with the appropriate data analysis tools, so as to report the findings