Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ted bundy case analysis
Ted bundy case analysis
Ted bundy case analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ted bundy case analysis
Relevant is the relevance attached to or associated among a proceeding with direction. Reliable is corroboration which occupies acceptable amplitude containing creditability, which can be if confirmation would be honest and legitimate. Competent includes relevant and reliable evidence anything else that is not concluded objectionable ((Gardner & Anderson, 2013).
Additionally, find a criminal court case that contains an example of relevant, reliable or competent evidence. You can use findlaw.com or other search engines to locate a useful case. Theodore Robert Bundy vs. State of Florida.
What are the basic facts of the case? The facts of the case are On February 9, 1978, a preteen girl by the name of Kimberly Leach, age 12, was believed to have been nowhere to be found in this girl’s high school which was located in Lake City, Florida, the Leach girl's to a certain degree disintegrated embodiment was found in the woodsy locality by the Suwanee River, in Suwanee County, Florida, later about two months after finding the body of the young girl, an area and county search was conducted into finding who the criminal was (FSU, Law, 2014).
Bundy was arrested for the kidnapping and murder of Kimberly Leach, on July 21, 1978. The arraignment was to be conducted at Suwanee County, in Florida. Bundy had motioned for transition away from the setting, and asked for an opportunity, for a reduction from the district attorney. The motion for a opportunity of a reduction was denied by the district attorneys office. But the setting was changed and admitted, the litigation was reassigned to the courts in Orange County, in Orlando, Florida. Bundy was declared guilty of first-degree murder and kidnapping. The jury asked for death. Bundy was...
... middle of paper ...
...ect match of DNA of either Bundy or Leach. The appealing of hypnosis that Bundy requested was smart, especially in one of the main eye witnesses, back then they used hypnosis in most cases to help lead investigators in having witnesses testify in court. Bundy argued that it wasn’t professional so the courts ended up reviewing hypnosis and coming to the conclusion that it wasn’t of their best interest to use the main eye witness statement while hypnotized. Most of the evidence found and testimonies are reliable which eyewitnesses are mostly.
Works Cited
FSU/Library (1985-2014). Supreme Court of Florida. Theodore Robert Bundy vs. State of
Florida. Retrieved from http://www.law.fsu.edu/library/flsupct/59128/op-59128.pdf
Gardner, T., & Anderson, T. (2013). Criminal evidence. (8th ed., pp. 35-37). Mason, Ohio:
Cengage Learning. DOI: www.cengage.com
Even though the prosecution presented evidence to the court, the only clear-cut hard fact the prosecution had against Anthony was that she failed to file a report for her missing daughter Caylee and that when she finally did a month after her daughter had gone missing, she proceeded to lie profusely to the authorities on the events that took place. The prosecution focused highly on the forensic evidence of decay located in the trunk of Casey Anthony’s car. The use of a cadaver dog to search the vehicle led investigators to be able to determine that a decomposing body had been stored in the trunk of the car. The forensics department used an air sampling procedure on the trunk of Casey Anthony’s car, also indicating that human decomposition and traces of chloroform were in-fact present. Multiple witnesses described what they considered to be an overwhelming odor that came from inside the trunk as it where the prosecution believes Caylee’s decomposing body was stowed. Several items of evidence were ruled out to be the source of the odor, as experts were able to rule out the garbage bag and two chlorine containers located in the trunk as the source. The prosecution alleged that Casey Anthony used chloroform to subdue her daughter and then used duct-tape to seal the nose and mouth of Caylee shut, inevitably causing her to suffocate. Based off the
To understand the connection you need to know something about the case. Three young boys were murdered on May 5, 1993 (Leveritt 5). They were stripped of their clothing, their hands were bound and they were forced underwater in the nearby creek where they stayed until they were found the next day. Little evidence was collected the day of their discovery, what was recovered was mislabeled and handled incorrectly. The boys were laying in the open elements for 3 hours before they saw any kind of medical examiner (Leveritt 23). Later, three teenagers (Damien Echols, Jason Baldwin and Jessie Misskelley) were tried with only an inaccurate confession (that was later recanted) and uninformed tips from concerned citizens (Robertson 2). They decided to enter Alford guilty pleas after repeat accusations and little other option (Robertson 3). They became known as the “West Memphis Three.”
A pretrial plea bargain was given to Bundy, which was Bundy would plea guilty to the murders of killing Levy, Bowman and Leach. In exchange, Bundy would be sentenced to prison for a firm 75 years. He ultimately declined the offer and decided with trying to win the case, which was not a smart move by Bundy. Bundy thought the prosecutors had no evidence from the Chi Omega sorority, but what he’s about to find out ruins his life. No evidence was recovered at the Chi Omega sorority house like Bundy thought, but two crucial testimonies from sorority members played a big role. Connie Hastings believed she saw Bundy in the house that night, while Nita Neary stated that she saw him escaping the house clasping the oak firewood murder weapon. These testimonies showed that Bundy was in the house and was in the house around the same time of the murders. But with no physical evidence, Bundy could not be found guilty. What Bundy didn’t realize was that there was a piece of evidence from the sorority crime scene. While investigators examined the scene, one officer found the bite marks on Levy’s buttocks. The officer picked up a yellow marker ruler and took photographs of the bite mark. By the time the trial had started the bite mark disappeared, because the tissue around Levy’s buttocks had gone back to its normal color, size and shape. Prosecutors took the photos to forensic odontologist Dr. Richard Souviron.
On April 5, 1999, 22 year old, Aaron McKinney was found guilty of felony murder, second-degree murder, kidnapping and robbery. 21 year old, Russell Henderson pled guilty to kidnapping and felony murder and was sentenced to two consecutive life terms. Two women described as the suspects girlfriends, Chasity Vera Pasley (20) and Krista Lean Price (18) were charged as accessories after the fact of first-degree murder (The Data Lounge, Issues 2000, [on-line]).
In the town, of West Memphis, Arkansas, three eight year old boys (Chris Byers, Michael Moore, and Stevie Branch) went missing May fourth, the following day they were found bruised, mutilated, hogtied, and stripped of their clothes with signs of rape present due to the dilation of the anus. The body of Byers was found submerged in the creek about 60 yards south of Interstate 55(Crime scene or dump site?). The other two bodies was located exactly five feet in both directions of Byers body. (It was determined that Moore and Branch both died from multiple traumatic injuries to the head, torso, and extremities with drowning; while, Byers died of the multiple traumatic i...
The case begins with the murder of young Kimberly Nees, a recently graduated girl in the year 1979. Her truck was found pg no evidence of something being stolen or sexually damaging showing it was personal).
There are archetypal patterns in life. They reoccur and become familiar to people through all ages and ethnicities. Throughout history, few literary works have captivated audiences by incorporating these patterns. The epic Beowulf is one literary work that effectively incorporates timeless components. The epic poem relates the tale of Beowulf, a warrior who throughout his life overcomes evils. It has strong elements of Anglo-Saxon elements of bravery, strength and of religious tenets. Beowulf enjoys universal appeal primarily because of its elements of characterization, plot and theme that prove timeless. Beowulf’s portrayal of human nature proves eternal. The protagonist Beowulf brashly lists his accomplishments before entering battle: "But the truth is simple: no man swims in the sea as I can, no strength is a match for mine… other monsters crowded around me, continually attacking. I treated them politely, offering the edge of my razor-sharp sword," (265-294). His boasts are symbolic of his personal insecurity. Beowulf seems scared of defeat and faliure. His boastful remarks are reminders to himself of his invincibility. Because he is insecure, Beowulf is an accurate representation of human nature. The poem also discloses social behaviors through Welthow, who portrays appropriate submissiveness of a wife. Women in society and position always are hot topics for discussion in any country and time period. She is subservient to her husband and " [pours] a portion from the jeweled cup for each, till [she] had carried the mead-cup among [the guests]," (354-372). Jealousy is a accurately portrayed in the poem.
In addition, the defendant’s erratic behavior that raised suspicion could also be used to prove the burden of proof. The fact that the defendant indicated that his wife was deceased, while she was still alive, can demonstrate that the murder was planned. Moreover, the defendant’s strategic travel to San Diego after Laci’s Peterson body and fetus were discovered and the change in the defendant’s physical appearance can be used to allude to the proof of the defendant’s consciousness of guilt. Also, the items removed from the defendant’s car during the traffic stop, specifically the thousands of dollars in cash, can indicate that the defendant planned to flee the country at some point during his trip to San Diego. Lastly, the chain of events that took place during the period of the victim’s disappearance and the discovery of her body, and the defendant’s secret lover becoming a key witness, was used to strengthen the circumstantial evidence.
In the court of law, eyewitnesses are expected to present evidence based upon information they acquired visually. However, due to memory processing, presenting this information accurately is not always possible. This paper will discuss the reliability of eyewitness testimony, its use in a relevant court case, and how the reasonable person standard relates to eyewitness testimony.
The two men kidnapped his wife in Alabama and her body was found on the side of a road in Georgia. The accused plead guilty to the crime of malice murder in Georgia for the exchange of a sentence life in prison. But just after the trial the accused was tried in Alabama for the crime of murder during the kidnapping and rejected his claim of double jeopardy and was sentenced to death.
According to the Innocence Project (2006), “On September 17, 2001, Chad wrote the Innocence Project in New York, which, in 2003, enlisted pro bono counsel from Holland & Knight to file a motion for DNA testing on Tina’s fingernail scrapings.” The state had tested the DNA that was under Tina’s nail from the first case but at that time it was inadequate and could not be tested. It was not until now that we have the technology capable enough to test it. In June 2004, the test came back negative to matching both Jeremey and Chain Heins but did come from an unknown male. The state argued that it was not enough to overturn the conviction so Chad’s attorney asked the state to do some further testing and to compare the DNA from under the fingernails to the hairs that was found on Tina’s body. It was in 2005 that the Florida Department of Law Enforcement confirmed that there was a match between the DNA under Tina’s nail and the pubic hair. According to LaForgia (2006), “this particular type of DNA, the report stated, was found in only about 8 percent of Caucasian American men.” During this process there was a new piece of evidence that Chad’s attorney had learned about during the appeals process, a fingerprint. There were some accusations that the prosecutors never disclosed this information about this third fingerprint and if they did it was too late. The jurors did not even know about this fingerprint and if they did this could have changed the whole case. This fingerprint was found on several objects that included the smoke detector, a piece of glass, and the bathroom sink. It was soon discovered that this fingerprint matched with the DNA found on the bedsheets that Tina was on. This was finally enough evidence to help Chad Heins become exonerated in
"Know the Cases." Innocence Project. Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, n.d. Web. 1 Mar 2011. .
Despite a very confident and relaxed attitude, he was found guilty and sentenced to a one to fifteen jail sentence in the Utah State Prison, on June 30, 1976. Colorado investigators who were not satisfied with the outcome, decided that they gathered enough evidence to have him tried for the murder of Caryn Campbell. Eventually, charges were made against him on October 22, 1976, which led to his extradition to Colorado in April of
The relationship between law enforcement and prosecutors, which goes hand-in-hand, can’t be overlooked. Evidence of a crime that detectives and law enforcement discover is as equally important as a good trial on part of the prosecution. If detectives aren’t able to find good solid evidence – that case usually isn’t bothered in being pursued. Several years ago, in the late 80’s, there was a murder case in Southeastern Oklahoma which now serves as a tragic example to the need for honest, constitutional work in the criminal justice system. Disreputable investigative procedures, fraudulent sources, and bad evidence were the foundation of this case that shattered innocent lives.
In 1974, a man named Ted Bundy began a murderous rampage in which countless women were the victims of rape, kidnapping, and murder. The women who were targeted all shared physical similarities, and it is believed that Bundy chose his victims because they had similar physical attributes to the woman he fell in love with in college. To this day, the number of Bundy’s victims are still not certain. It took years for police to successfully have Bundy under control, and the decision at that point was to put him in the electric chair. Ted Bundy left a huge impact on the safety of many women and the families of the women affected.