1. What is the definition of an "ex post facto" law and why are they unfair? Ex post facto is a law that retroactively changes the lawful results of activities that were conferred, or connections that existed, before the authorization of the law. It is out of line since it might criminalize activities that were lawful when perpetrated; it might exasperate a wrongdoing by bringing it into a more extreme class than it was in when it was carried out; it might change the discipline recommended for a wrongdoing, as by including new punishments or broadening sentences; or it might modify the tenets of confirmation so as to make conviction for a wrongdoing likelier than it would have been the point at which the deed was carried out.
2. Compare and contrast tort and criminal law. What are some types of behavior that would be covered by both types of law? In criminal law, the indictment is by the legislature. Disciplines might be fines (paid to the administration) or the correctional facility. In tort law, the offended party who brings the claim is the individual who was specifically harmed and the discipline is normally installment of harms to the individual harmed. A few demonstrations of conduct that would be secured by both sorts of laws are whether some individual physically hit another person and intended to bring about damage on them that would make them confront both criminal allegations furthermore need to confront a claim if that individual sues them.
3. Compare over breadth and vagueness. Give an example of how a legislative body could violate each doctrine. The over breadth doctrine is essentially worried with facial difficulties to laws under the First Amendment. American courts have perceived a few special cases to the disco...
... middle of paper ...
...h the defendant is unaware of this when the attempt is made and the second impossibility is an act that is considered legally impossible to commit and is considered a valid defense for a person who is being prosecuted for a criminal attempt.
5. Discuss the four types of participant liability under the Common Law and give examples. The four types of participant liability under the common law are principal in the first degree, principal in the second degree, accessory before the fact, and accessory after the fat the actualities make the planned wrongdoing difficult to perpetrate in spite of the fact that the litigant is ignorant of this when the endeavor is made and the second inconceivability is a demonstration that is considered lawfully difficult to carry out and is viewed as a legitimate safeguard for a man who is being arraigned for a criminal endeavor
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- The Absence of the Concept of Transferred Malice in Irish Tort Law Introduction The title of this assignment, which i propose that i shall be revisiting for the purposes of this tort project is that: “the concept of transferred malice is not accepted in Irish tort law” In dealing with this topic I will inevitably be looking at what a battery is, what is transferred malice, cases in other jurisdictions which have accepted the concept of transferred malice in tort law, transferred malice in crime and why it is accepted in criminal law, and finally my arguments as to why I believe it should be adopted into our jurisdiction.... [tags: Tort Law]
1887 words (5.4 pages)
- In this essay I will endeavour to outline what the intended purpose of tort law is in the Irish legal system and how it has come about over centuries. I will include a brief outline of the meaning of tort law and the different kinds of Tort, I will also include a brief summary of the sister laws of tort, that being criminal and contract law. The word tort is the equivalent of the French word that means ‘wrong’. This word ‘tort’ was derived from the Latin word ‘tortum’, translated this means twisted, crooked or wrong.... [tags: legal issues, english law, normans]
2424 words (6.9 pages)
- In today’s health care, there are laws set in place to protect the well-being and best interest of the patient. These laws range from tort laws, criminal laws, and contract laws. Although each of these laws are set in place to protect the patient to a certain degree of wrongdoing on the physicians and medical facilities part, they can be distinguished by which one affects health care professionals directly compared to indirectly. In this paper, I will discuss the Tort Law, the law that most directly influences Health Care Professionals.... [tags: Medical Ethics ]
1260 words (3.6 pages)
- Introduction Employment law is a body which governs the relationship between employers and employees. It involves application of tort and contract doctrines with a number of statutory regulations (Covington, 2009).This issues include the rights to negotiate and organize collective bargaining agreements, protection from harsh working conditions,safety and health issues. Why is it important to have employment law in the workplace. Employment law plays a significant role in ensuring that the rights and interest of both the employees and employer are met successfully (Braithwaite& Drahos, 2000).... [tags: Employment, Law, Trade union, Business]
937 words (2.7 pages)
- Roles and Functions of Law in Business and Society Introduction William O. Douglas said, "Common sense often makes good law." Well that is what laws essentially are, rules and regulations that make sure common sense is followed. One could even say that laws are enforced ethics. Laws serve several roles and functions in business and society, and this paper will discuss those roles and functions. What is law. According to Reference.com (2007), law is defined as: "rules of conduct of any organized society, however simple or small, that are enforced by threat of punishment if they are violated.... [tags: Business Law]
897 words (2.6 pages)
- HEALTH AND SAFETY Control of substances hazardous to health (COSHH,2002) – One of the most hazardous substances around would be chlorine for when you are going swimming and the chlorine substance would cause a irritation to the eyes. They use chlorine at the swimming baths to make sure the water is clean for all the customers to use. The safety issues that they could face would be COSSH which is an important substance what goes into swimming pools which contains different chemicals. Manual handling operations regulations (1992) – a man handling sport that would put you most in danger would be a sport such as weightlifting.... [tags: Tort, Law, Negligence, Common law]
708 words (2 pages)
- A police officer, Colin Allcars (Allcars), is suing Harry’s Ammo World (HAW) for his medical expenses, personal injuries, pain and suffering. HAW sold a rifle to Dakota D. West without checking West’s background for felonies or drug use. Federal law prevents the sale of firearms to anyone with a felony or to anyone that uses illegal drugs. Dakota had been convicted of a felony and was also a user of marijuana. Two months after the sale Dakota’s brother took the rifle and took hostages. When the police were trying to subdue and arrest Dakota’s brother he shot and wounded Colin AllCars.... [tags: Tort, Negligence, Law, Tort law]
1873 words (5.4 pages)
- According to In Brief helping with life’s legal issues, “trespass to the person is an element of tort law which covers wrongs done to an individual. [And] can exist even if the victim suffers no physical harm…There are three main wrongs which fall under the umbrella of trespass to the person: assault, battery and false imprisonment. They are intentional torts, meaning they cannot be committed by accident, therefore, they are civil wrongs and not criminal wrongs.” As stated by Winflield and Jolowiz on Tort 14th Ed., page 58, defines Battery as: “the intentional and direct application of force to another person.” As well, such application of force should be without the consent of the victim a... [tags: Contract, Tort, Common law, Tort law]
887 words (2.5 pages)
- Since the Arms Act became law, only a few cases have had the opportunity to be heard by a jury. In Alaska, a jury found that a gun dealer was not liable for wrongful death arising out of a third party criminal actor’s conduct; the petitioner appealed up to the Supreme Court of Alaska, which affirmed. Then, Milwaukee police officers wounded by guns sold by a negligent dealer brought two suits and were able to settle respectively for $1 million after trial, and $250,000 just before trial. The fact that so few of these claims are heard by juries is contrary to the public interest.... [tags: Law, Supreme Court of the United States, Tort]
1402 words (4 pages)
- ... Although most of the contracts are done verbally but there are some requirements of how should a contract be maintain valid in which the most important two are Firstly there should be acceptance of offer by both the parties and secondly there must be something in exchange like the goods, services or promise. Here, the question arises that does a contract needs to be written. Written agreement of the Contract is a wise decision to made, some of the state laws requires written agreement of contract for certain dealings.... [tags: legal system, case study]
1672 words (4.8 pages)