Senkaku Islands Case Study

858 Words2 Pages

Over the past decades, Japan and China have been arguing over the Senkaku Islands or the Diaoyu Islands. These islands are known to be close to many shipping lines and near potential oil reserves (BBC 2014). The dispute however, goes beyond the "rightful" ownership of a few islands, it is about the principles. To the two countries, it seems as if whomever “wins” rightful ownership means that they are more powerful. By China claiming these islands, they express their dominance over Japan. By Japan claiming these islands, they stand their ground on the islands that they have inhabited for years. Although the two countries have not declared war yet, I believe they are acting under a realism approach. The Chinese government has no legal records of reserving the rights to these islands; nonetheless, China presumes they are superior in the …show more content…

The Chinese government argues that Japan stole these islands from them and it is internationally known, “The Cairo Declaration used "stolen," a word rarely seen in international legal instruments, and it was reaffirmed by the Potsdam Proclamation. This clearly defines the illegal nature of Japan 's aggression and the stealing of Chinese territory, and makes it clear to the whole world that China is the owner and Japan is the thief” (fmprc.gov.cn 2012). Although they strongly feel this way, they are not willing to start a war over this territory. They understand the possible consequences from acting on an irrational decision such as war. If they would declare a war, they would ultimately be damaging their economy and have a greater chance of losing to Japan. At the same time, however, they will not easily give up the island for it would show weakness. Thus displaying Japan being dominant to China. Because of realism, China is motivated to be on top and feels as if Diaoyu is legitimately theirs. This is why they are taunting

More about Senkaku Islands Case Study

Open Document