Introduction
In nature there is a system, which operates, in such a way that there is no waste. Nutrients and metabolisms go through a cycle, going through different transformations. One simple cycle is the process of exhalation of carbon dioxide. Animals and human beings exhale carbon dioxide, which is taken in by plants, as it is an important component for its food making process called photosynthesis. Leaves that fall to the ground are naturally broken down into nutrients for the soil and fertilisers for trees. (McDonough and Braungart, 2002, Pg. 92) These relationship cycles in nature can be applied in architecture as well. Buildings as living organisms constantly change in time. It could be due to a change in use, weathering, and vandalism or by the materials that they are built with. They grow and degenerate, absorbing the unnecessary that they find in their surroundings and setting free whatever is no longer needed. (Hinte, Peeren and Jongert, 2007, Pg. 18) When we recycle buildings, there are many strategies that can be applied, reusing the facade, and incorporating materials, which remain on site and even by encapsulation. There are various approaches as each derelict building has its historical identity and complications. This essay explores typologies of derelict buildings around Manchester as case studies and explores the strategies used. Some strategies reuse materials that are found on site. There will be an analysis whereby building materials would be extracted, either for it to be restored and incorporated into the new design or totally reformed into a different material for different use. This essay looks into the similarities of biological cycles and building-recycling taking different perspective to building r...
... middle of paper ...
...". [online] HowStuffWorks. Available at: http://science.howstuffworks.com/life/evolution/evolution.htm [Accessed 1 May. 2014].
13. Webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk, (2014). [ARCHIVED CONTENT] Design process | Rostron Brow | Building for Life. [online] Available at: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110107165544/http://www.buildingforlife.org/case-studies/rostron-brow/design-process [Accessed 1 May. 2014].
14. Rose, J. (2014). In The Face Of Disaster, Pritzker Winner Shigeru Ban Designs Solutions. [online] NPR.org. Available at: http://www.npr.org/2014/03/24/292420643/pritzker-winner-shigeru-ban-designs-solutions-in-the-face-of-disaster [Accessed 1 May. 2014].
Pictures
15. Fig. 1 http://biologos.org/uploads/static-content/Figure_1.png. (2014). [image] Available at: http://biologos.org/uploads/static-content/Figure_1.png [Accessed 1 May. 2014].
Lawson, Bryan. How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified. 4th ed. Oxford: Architectural Press, 2006.
Sorkin, Michael., Mildred S. Friedman, Frank O. Gehry, Frank O.Gehry Associates. Gehry Talks: architecture + Process. New York: Universe Publishing: Distributed to the U.S trade by St. Martin’s Press, 2002.
Lawson, Bryan. How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified. NY: Architectural Press, 1980, 2007. Massachusetts: NECSI Knowledge Press, 2004.
This essay will provide a simple but informative definition of path-based design referring to the works of Aldo Van Eyck and Peter + Alison Smithson. It will discuss the positives and negatives that come from this design concept and propose reasoning behind the different ways the style has been expressed by these three architects. After the discussion the conclusion will provide a summarized definition of path based design and it’s key attributes.
The argument that should buildings get rebuild exterior and interior before they get destroyed has been progressing for Years worldwide. Restoration appears to be a solution to achieve new uses from historical buildings and make them last for many more years. In this essay I will be stating examples of historical buildings that they have been treated, reconstructed and they have increased their productivity of each individual example. Also negative aspects and views from people who were against
Our experiences in a space, shape the way we perceive architecture – the space, structure, surfaces, memory and experiences all play a role in what we may distinguish as spirit of place. The effect this has on us is what shapes our identity, which in turn will be reflected in the architecture. The same qualities can be found in objects, which may have emotional meaning; a catalyst for triggering memories that are significant to us, which differs from the unemotional account of a descendant, to which it is nothing more than a historical narrative, because they were not participant in the past experience, therefore has no connection emotionally. As time moves forward, memories become history; an unemotional, factual account of the past. Nevertheless, history can still have an impact on the way we perceive and use architecture. Uncovering historical artifacts during a renovation, or a visitor with an emotional account of a space, can redefine one’s emotional connection toward a space, expanding both the narrative of the building, enriching our personal experience and creating a sense of connection and “home. As society endures changes, our social values and experiences change with these times. Changing social values in Australia were reflected in the post war period, with economic prosperity spawning the suburban lifestyle, with new modern, forward looking architectural designs gaining popularity – A way to forget the past and focus on the progression of a new wealth. Identity is memory; it is the narrative of who we are. The story of Yallourn shows the damage that can be done when identity is removed from a community. Identity is memory. We use architecture to record our existence, our culture, our heritage. It is the tangible account of who we are, and who we were. To have this taken away from us effectively obliterates our existence – to burn the
Sustainable design seeks to reduce negative impacts on the environment, the health and comfort of building occupants, thereby improving building performance. The basic objects of sustainability are to reduce consumption of non-renewable resources, minimal waste, and create healthy, productive environments (“Sustainable Design”). Focusing primarily on the sustainable design principles, there are five, including: low-impact materials, energy efficiency, quality and durability, design for reuse and recycling, and renewability. As sustainability appears to become the necessary trend in architecture, the question concerning the cost versus outcome of “going green” really an investment or a waste of time and money comes to mind. With our research provided below, we believe the expenses may truly be with the investment in the end.
Hopkins, Graeme and Christine Goodwin. Living Architecture: Green Roofs and Walls. Collingwood, CSIRO Publishing. 2011,Print.
Last year, I was involved in designing a roof for a proposed Tate Modern extension in a project sponsored by architecture firm Ove Arup. For this, I gained a Crest 'Gold' Award but more importantly the opportunity to investigate something from a technical point of view, thus branching away from my mainly unscientific subject base.
Design has major impact with concerns to environmental qualities. This field is a direct study of the relationship between behaviouristic actions of its inhabitants. Designers constantly interact with people and communicate to solve the needs of their clients regardless of large or small scale projects. Analysis is key in combining creativity with managerial design solutions. These outside-of-the-box designers have the ability to create beautiful, safe and functional and aesthetically pleasing spaces using common factors, designing for communities as well as,
Human beings are susceptible to the force of nature. They had to make shelter for themselves. Material was one of the most basic tools to create shelter. By development of building construction, selection and use of materials also developed. The relationship between the architecture and the materials before invention of modern materials was simple and generally naturally [1]; in the past, architects always use tradition materials according their experimental skills. For choosing structural materials, they had attention to important factors such as availability (local materials) and harmony with climate and culture [2], although this way was forward with feedback. But this relationship was not continuing simply.
However, architecture is not just the future, after all, buildings are intended to be viewed, traversed and lived by us, people. Despite this, many architects today rarely think deeply about human nature, disregarding their main subject matter in favour for efficiency and an architecture of spectacle. In this there seems to be a misconception that underlies much of architecture, that is, human’s relationship with the city, the building and nature. In much of today’s architecture, people are treated with as much concern much as we treat cars, purely mechanically. The post-modern search for the ‘new’ and ‘novel’ has come to disregard the profound affect design has on our lives, impacting our senses, shaping our psyche and disposition.
Modernization of architecture in our society can be very beneficial towards meeting the new and advanced needs of a society. These changes often involve amendments and renovations to structures and infrastructure. Total investments made towards these changes help the circulation of money throughout society through this cause. Along with these changes, however, come permits and guidelines for new and improved structures to follow. These guidelines help to ensure adjustments to new structures easily adapt to the present environment and/or wildlife and that the population can adjust to these changes as well. Overall, these expenses should be supported by a society's economy, further improving economic status through this effort. Modernizing architecture
The beginnings of today's green revolution can be traced back to the environmental awareness of the 1960s and European design. New construction techniques have lead to the development of innovative materials and design concepts. Green buildings are designed, constructed and commissioned to ensure they are healthy for their occupants. Successfully designed green projects can involve an extensive array of factors, ranging from the resourceful use of materials, to careful consideration of function, climate, and location.
Nature in architecture is critical. Laugier made this clear in the 1700s with his basic, but insightful, claims in “An Essay on Architecture.” Modern architects have taken his beliefs further than he probably ever imagined with technology and the cutting-edge idea of biomimicry. After studying natures’ artistic design, architectural stature, and overall success rate on this earth, I believe that the incorporation of nature is vital to architectural design.