Themes In Wendell Berry's 'The Pleasures Of Eating'

1015 Words3 Pages

Recognizing and escaping the food industry’s trap How to flee the trap. In “The Eco-Gastronomic Mirror: Narcissism and Death at the Dinner Table” by Jordan Shapiro and “The Pleasures of Eating” by Wendell Berry the reader is introduced to both authors’ views on the relationship between humans, food and nature. In Berry’s essay, he argues, that people should try to eat healthier instead of processed foods made solely by the manufacturers. He seems to be trying to reach out to the general masses. However, Shapiro prefers to view the human relationship with food psychologically. Shapiro talks about his time in the kitchen from when he was a young trainee through to his maturity. Shapiro may be trying to get his point across to food eaters everywhere.
In the introduction, the reader is given an immediate feel of the essay is about and is already clear on the purpose of the article which is to guide the reader to “Eat responsibly”. The writer avoids any errors of fact and any misinterpretation or misrepresentation of any facts. In compliance with the essay the title “The Pleasures of Eating” relays the thoughts of the author as he suggests that the true “Pleasure of Eating” is in the process, from personally growing the food to preparing it and knowing fully well the hard work and preparation needed to put the food on the table. The discussion does not stray from the topic at hand rather it stays focused talking about important information with apposite points. The points in this essay where each given their own merit by neither over nor underemphasizing any of them. Undeniably the author assumes that most people access their information about food from commercials and do not actually put in any effort to know what goes into their food, though people do at least try to take a stand by seeking out organic food products nevertheless they are deceived as the government agencies set in place to aid them instead works against them with lax guidelines. The essayist observes the interactions between the
He aspires to logically persuade his audience about the insanity of the way in which food is processed and stored. He comments on the ways by which the imperfections in the food are masked in the kitchen. The author reiterates his experience at the hands of older male chefs and the things he saw and felt while training in the kitchen. He endeavors to debunk the myth that cooking in a large kitchen is anything but noisy and infernal, as portrayed by movies such as “Ratatouille (2007)”. The essayist intends to draw his audience’s attention to the fact that eating is an interaction with the natural world. The writer discloses a story about his son to illustrate the degradation of the definition of food in society today. He prefers to reason with his audience purely through logic. He strives to make his audience see that they both literally and metaphorically digest the planet through

Open Document