The greatest leak in history provided the nation an idea of what is actually behind the headlines. The truth. We are now able to know that the soldiers have been through conditions that are harsher than what we have seen in the media. Evidence from live footage, the ‘Collateral Murder’, clearly reveals the façade of our society, allowing us to feel more empathy and respect for these brave men. Reactions to this were also seen through Twitter, where the use of hashtags related to the Iraq War logs was trending worldwide, and individual perceptions were communicated showing their pessimistic view about the truth. Also some views seen through tweets are shown to be disappointed by our society, which therefore the leakage weren’t better for the world as it builds an untrustworthy image towards their government. In my view I would agree with the leakage being better as for the future we could shape out perception on how war should be conducted.
However, the leakage wasn’t better for the world, as it can be used as a weapon against both the US and Iraq. Dr. Toby Dodge, a political scientist mentioned that ‘far too many Iraqi’s civilians a...
... middle of paper ...
... change our lives. Although, legally, Manning had fulfilled the Espionage Act, exposing government secrets. Ethically the court and government must follow the law to put him in jail. It could be viewed that this action was not ‘better for the world’ as it may encourage bad influence to hackers who would want to be seen as a ‘hero’, which therefore a similar incident may occur again. These two views are very challenging to determine what was better for the world, yet ethics may be applied here that Manning had to be put into jail.
The Iraq War logs may or may not have ‘change the world for the better’, which is depended on a diverse range of perception. Through my view, the argument clearly states that the leakage surely was better for the world as it allows the public to know the truth. The truth can be harsh, nonetheless it is the reality and we must accept it.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- The Iraq War was a protracted armed conflict that began with the 2003 invasion of Iraq by a US-led coalition. The US wanted to destroy Saddam Hussein’s regime and bring democracy. To addition to that, US and its allies believed that Iraq had secret stocks of chemical and nuclear weapons, hence Iraq was a threat to the world (Axford 2010). In March 2003, US air bombed Baghdad and Saddam escaped Iraq. The invasion disarmed the government of Saddam Hussein. President Bush in March 2003 gave a premature speech, that tyrant of Iraq has fallen and US has freed its people.... [tags: Iraq War, Iraq, 2003 invasion of Iraq]
1565 words (4.5 pages)
- The Iraq War which started in 2003, and last until 2011 has in a sense been restarted. Which means in the past thirteen years American troops have been involved in operations in Iraq for all but three. The cost of the Iraq War has sky rocketed into the trillions, and the loss of lives into the Thousands, and the effects of the Iraq War will be felt for a long time. Entering Iraq has caused Americans to set a precedents about our policy and moral standing, that we greatly shape our future endeavors and policies towards foreign nations.... [tags: Iraq War, 2003 invasion of Iraq, Iraq]
2013 words (5.8 pages)
- Evaluating The War in Iraq Is the war in Iraq right. Is this not a form of terrorism?, to have U.S. troops stationed in Iraq for six year now. How about pushing our system of government onto another country, isn’t that a form of terrorism. Isn’t this wrong of the US and our fellow Americans to still believe that we’re doing the right thing, when we’ve never received a straight answer as to why we’re even in another country fighting. These are all questions we should be asking, and the answer should be, that it’s morally wrong of the U.S.... [tags: War, Iraq]
526 words (1.5 pages)
- 1. There was very little evidence and the United States acted prematurely. The evidence itself is confusing and somewhat misleading. As we look on the invasion many Americans were very enthusiastic about going to war with Iraq. However, we’re not trying to think about why we were not there or trying to justify other than speculate the following reasons. Did Iraq have weapons of mass destruction or was the United States to find about their military power. Possibly, the United States was trying to eliminate Saddam and his regime to promote democracy and peace.... [tags: war, Iraq, USA, ]
467 words (1.3 pages)
- Countries engage in war for reasons that may often seem to have simple solutions. At first glance, reasons for war can seem petty or pompous. In fact however, the steps to war often are complex and deep, shrouded in history, cultural clashes and religious disputes. The Iran-Iraq war of the 1980’s for instance locked the two nations in conflict for nearly eight years, costing nearly half a million Iraqi and Iranian soldiers, and an equivalent number of civilians their lives, with no real resolution to the dispute.... [tags: Iran, Iraq, Iran–Iraq War, Saddam Hussein]
2353 words (6.7 pages)
- The History of Two Nations at War Iran and Iraq’s relations have been hostile since the Iran-Iraq war, also known as the first Persian Gulf War. The war lasted from September 1980 to August 1988, making it the 20th century 's longest conventional war. Saddam, who was the 5th president of Iraq, was so amused with the continuous battles that he made it a point to have the Iraqi 25-dinar note display the Battle of al-Qadisiyyah on its currency. For nearly nine years, both countries suffered millions of casualties and lost countless amounts of dollars in destruction (Karsh, 2002).... [tags: Iran, Iraq, Iran–Iraq War, Saddam Hussein]
1017 words (2.9 pages)
- The Iran-Iraq War: The Iran-Iraq War occurred from 22 September 1980 to 20 August 1988. The conflict was a conventional war fought by two different states: the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Iraqi Republic. Notably, two key non-state actors participated in the war: Iran 's government found allies in the oppressed Iraqi Kurdish ethnic group, who fought in conjunction with Iranian offensives. Iraq aligned itself with the Mujaheddin of Iran, who opposed the Iranian government. The conflict took place along the Iran-Iraq border, in South-West Asia.... [tags: Iran, Iraq, Iran–Iraq War, Saddam Hussein]
1063 words (3 pages)
- Pick up any newspaper or point your web browser to any major or minor news publication and questions like these will be all over them. A lot of Americans feel that the War on Terror and our presence in Iraq has lasted too long. Are they correct. Should we pull out and call it quits. Should we have another repeat of the Vietnam War. Believe it or not, that's how a lot of people view this war, as another Vietnam. They feel that we are out there, putting the American nose into something that shouldn't be picked.... [tags: Argumentative Persuasive Iraq War Terror]
1659 words (4.7 pages)
- The Whole Truth about the Iraq War For my first peace paper I went to the Ritz East movie theater on September 30th to watch the movie "Uncovered: The Whole Truth about the Iraq War." This is a movie whose mission was to reveal the lies that have been told to the American people by the Bush Administration. The majority of the audience seemed to me to be democrats or at least people who opposed the war in Iraq and the Bush Administration.... [tags: Film Movie Iraq War]
1267 words (3.6 pages)
- The Iraq war has been a very sensitive and divisive issue in today's society. Although we can not ignore the cloud around this administration when it comes to potential incentives that going to war presented, (such as oil for profits and retaliation to Saddam Hussein for the Gulf War and treatment of President Bush Sr.), I will look beyond these potential motives to explain why the U.S. involvement in the Iraq War was unjust simply because it doesn't fall into any of the four functions of force authored by Robert J.... [tags: US History Iraq War]
1471 words (4.2 pages)