Why Projects Fail in A380

1281 Words3 Pages

Introduction
In June 1994, Airbus announced its plan to develop its own very large airliner, designated the A3XX (Bowen, 1994). Airbus refined its plan, focusing on a 15–20% reduction in working expenses over the existing Boeing 747-400 (Harrison, 1996). To begin with, Airbus entered commercial service in October 2007 with Singapore Airlines. By December 2013, Airbus has received 304 firm orders and delivered 123 aircrafts (Airbus, 2014b). The Emirates has the most A380s on firm order - 140 in total (Topham, 2013).

The objectives of Airbus Company are to create a consortium of existing companies (France, Germany, Spain, UK). Transform this company into advanced association fit for contending and capable of competing with American companies. The significant structural sections of the A380 are built in France, Germany, Spain, and United Kingdom (Moralws, 2006). Suppliers (General Electric (America), Rolls-Royce (UK), United Technologies (America) provides their components (Babka, 2006).

This report aims to give the reflection about my group work. This report also provides an analysis and evaluation of “Why project fails in Airbus – A380” which might impact the company policies and performance. Also evaluate the impact of classical mistakes in such failure on the company from my group work. This report not only shows analysis and evaluation of the advantages of “Why projects fail in A380”, but also shows the advantages of working in a group; however, the problems occurred will be mentioned.

Finally, the paper is briefly about the benefits that I have drawn from the Understanding Business and Management Research Methods module and group process.
Benefits from group work
Working in a group also has many benefits because multiple ...

... middle of paper ...

...ear Kosice on Nov 7th 2012.
Solution 2:
Due to the engine problems, Rolls Royce has provided software that would shut down a Trent 900 engine to prevent a repeat occurrence of accidents. By using the software provided by Rolls-Royce, the ATSB said that it was pleased because it increases the exhaust gas temperature to prevent engine shut down. This problem happened because the damage in HPT stage-2 nozzle distress. They solved the problem by replacing new components.
Issue 3:
The Engine Alliance and Rolls Royce state that there should be the improvement in fuel consumption for the Airbus A380.
Solution 3:
The target of the improvement is to lower the fuel consumption by 10 per cent. They are studying to apply a new engine to the plane by using the engine from the General Electric-Pratt & Whitney. This project should be complete and ready to be delivered around 2016.

Open Document