To use Rawls principles of justice one must first enter the original position. The original position according to Rawls is “the appropriate initial status quo which insures that the fundamental agreements reached in it are fair.” (Rawls: Justice as Fairness, From a Theory of Justice. pg. 489) What Rawls is trying to do is create a position in which a person removes themselves from all forms of bias. Potential forms of bias are race, color, gender, social status, and things such as our own theory of the good; are what need to be removed from the original position and placed outside the “Veil of Ignorance”. One would be removing bias from themselves, or stripping away the layers that could form a judgment based on something that would favor one group from another. Potential sources of bias are also known as what are not allowed behind “veil of Ignorance”. However, to make a valid and sound conclusion on something one must be knowledgeable enough to ma...
... middle of paper ...
...the bourgeoisie or rich, control the proletariat or poor. Nozick could be seen as a Marxist due to the very nature that according to his principles of justice allow for an employer to very largely profit off the hard work and dedication of an employee, who is making a much smaller profit, as long as the profit is justly acquired and held. Nozick’s theory would also remove the taxation of the rich to an equal taxation of both the poor and rich.
Nozick, Robert. "The Entitlement Thoery of Justice, from Anarch, State, and Utopia."
Philosophical Problems. By Laurence Bonjour and Ann Baker. Ed. Eric Stano. 2nd ed. New York:
Pearson, 2008. 476-482. Print.
Rawls, John. “Justice As Fairness, From A Theory Of Justice.”
Philosophical Problems. By Laurence Bonjour and Ann baker. Ed. Eric Stano. 2nd ed. New York:
Pearson, 2008. 4854-494. Print
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- John Rawls and Robert Nozick, in their writings, present their unique views on the conceived notion of a society and principles of social justice. Although their views are similar in some ways, they are also distinctly different. This difference is made clear as Rawls focuses on a scheme of basic rights, stressing a cooperative effort in society while Nozick focuses more on the individual’s right to property. In this paper I will explain both Rawls’s and Nozick’s conceptions of society and principles of social justice.... [tags: A Theory of Justice, John Rawls]
2148 words (6.1 pages)
- Sandel’s thinks that the question of distributive justice is where the principles of justice are derived from. He states that Rawls believed that these principles are best derived from a hypothetical contract and that said contract should be carried out behind the veil of ignorance. Rawls then argued that those who are self-interested behind this veil would choose these two principles of justice to structure society: the principle of fair equality of opportunity and the difference principle. The first principle explains that all jobs and positions should be open to every and any individual regardless of their wealth, level of education, etc while the second regulates inequalities, only permi... [tags: John Rawls, A Theory of Justice, Justice]
930 words (2.7 pages)
- In A Theory of Justice John Rawls presents his argument for justice and inequality. Rawls theorizes that in the original position, a hypothetical state where people reason without bias, they would agree to live in a society based on two principles of justice (Rawls 1971, 4). These two principles of justice are named the first and second principles. The first is the equal rights and liberties principle. The second is a combination of the difference principle and the fair equality of opportunity principle, or FEOP (Rawls 1971, 53).... [tags: inequalities, fair equality, principles]
1569 words (4.5 pages)
- With the issue of income inequality becoming more salient in present day politics, it has been argued that the United States is doing little to ensure equality of opportunity. Many economists today point to low levels of intergenerational social and economic mobility as evidence of these trends. Philosopher John Rawls’ second principle of justice states that inequalities can exist in society as long as they improve the general wellbeing of the least well off members of society. However, current inequalities in income and opportunities in the United States have been said to violate Rawls second principle of justice, because of their inability to provide the least well off members of society w... [tags: John Rawls, A Theory of Justice]
2144 words (6.1 pages)
- John Rawls’ Theory of Justice attempts to establish a fair and reasonable social account of social justice. To do this, he discusses two fundamental principles of justice, which if implemented into society, would guarantee a just and fair way of life. Rawls is mostly concerned with the social good (what is good and just), and his aim with the Theory of Justice is to provide a way that society could be one that is fair and just, while taking into consideration, a person’s primary goods (rights and liberties, opportunities, income and wealth, and the social bases of self-respect).... [tags: John Rawls, A Theory of Justice]
2303 words (6.6 pages)
- In John Rawls’ “Theory of Justice,” he describes important aspects of justice that are often times overlooked when trying to contain the controversy of justice. The main contribution that Rawls has to offer for equality and justice is his two principles of justice. The two principles of justice apply to the basic structure of society and govern rights and duties and attempt to help regulate the distribution of social and economic advantages. The first principle says that each person is to have an equal right to the most extensive scheme of equal basic liberties compatible with a similar scheme of liberties for others.... [tags: John Rawls, A Theory of Justice]
1229 words (3.5 pages)
- In regards to the social values of society, justice as a fairness can be comprehended differently for each person. Philosophical writer, John Rawls, makes a proposal of justice and injustice in the form of equality and inequality within social institutions. Rawls examines equality and inequality and the role of justice. Justice within liberty and opportunity, income and wealth, and the bases of self-respect. Justice as a fairness, and the conceptual tool of the “veil of ignorance” is used by Rawls to develop a theory of justice in equality and inequality.... [tags: Political philosophy, John Rawls, Justice]
1044 words (3 pages)
- John Rawls’ A Theory of Justice holds that a rational, mutually disinterested individual in the Original Position and given the task of establishing societal rules to maximise their own happiness throughout life, is liable to choose as their principles of justice a) guaranteed fundamental liberties and b) the nullification of social and economic disparities by universal equality of opportunities, which are to be of greatest benefit to the least advantaged members of society , . Rawls’ system of societal creation has both strengths and weaknesses, but is ultimately sound.... [tags: A Theory of Justice]
959 words (2.7 pages)
- John Rawls’ A Theory of Justice holds that rational, mutually disinterested individuals, in the Original Position and given the task of establishing societal rules to maximise their own happiness throughout life, are liable to choose as principles of societal justice a) guaranteed fundamental liberties and b) the nullification of social and economic disparities by universal equality of opportunities, which are to be of greatest benefit to the least advantaged members of society , . Rawls’ system of societal cbfgdbre for the maintenance of fundamental liberties, equality of opportunity and support for the disadvantaged is exercised.... [tags: A Theory of Justice]
786 words (2.2 pages)
- Rawls' Concept Of Justice As Political: A Defense Against Critics ABSTRACT: Rawls' theory of justice as fairness involves a central contention that principles of justice essential to the structure of a constitutional democracy must be viewed as political in contrast to more comprehensive moral, philosophical or religious doctrines. The concept of justice is not its being true to an antecedent moral order and given to us, but its being congruent with our self-understanding within the history of justice as political is not a mere modus vivendi, for it embodies an overlapping consensus that does have a moral basis.... [tags: Philosophy Philosophical Rawls Essays]
2208 words (6.3 pages)