Knowledge And Quick Wit In wars

1027 Words3 Pages

In the last 3500 years, only 230 years were without war and there was peace. The war is a conflict that has excessive violent resistance. People lived a lot of wars in history with a lot of casualties and military loss. They sacrificed themselves to save their families, countries, religions and nations. Sometimes, they could win the battles sometimes, could not. They tried many tactics, strategies and varieties of ways to win wars. While they were trying new and novus tactics, they used their knowledge and quick wit. Furthermore, quick wit and knowledge assisted more than swords to win wars in the past. In wars, quick wit and knowledge are more significant than the sword in terms of casualties and military needs.
First of all, quick wit and knowledge help to decrease the number of casualties. In history, people won the wars with their quick wit and knowledge. If people had been trying to win wars just with their concrete forces, they would not to be able to stop or reduce the number of casualties. The Battle of Thermopylae is an exceptional instance. The Battle of Thermopylae was between the Greek city-states and the Persian Empire. Fitzgerald reports, the Greek City-States were against to the Persian Empire with 23.800 soldiers to 3.470.000 soldiers so Persian Empire won the war (Fitzgerald, The Battle of Thermopylae Facts). Besides, the Persian Empire was continuing to slay more people. Consequently, the Greek City-States had to cease the Persian Empire. The Greek City-States used their quick wit and knowledge and they built a defense block at the narrowest pass of The Thermopylae. Lazenby states, "From a strategic point of view, by defending Thermopylae, the Greeks were making the best possible use of their forces " (248–253)....

... middle of paper ...

...and knowledge decrease the number of casualties and military needs in wars than swords are able to do. As has been mentioned, The Battle of Thermopylae, the Gallipoli Campaign, the Armistice of Mudros, the Conquest of Istanbul and the Battle of Mycale demonstrate knowledge and quick wit’s advantages in history. Quick wit and knowledge are solutions for conflicts. If people do not expect an army’s victory because of, their less military strength, quick wit and knowledge can save people and military strength. When people want to use strategy, they need quick wit. When they need to make the right decision, they need knowledge. If people do not use their quick wit and knowledge when swords cannot avail, they cannot reach their goal or get out of their predicaments. Hence, people resolve their problems by using knowledge and quick wit, not by using swords in their lives.

Open Document