Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Compare and contrast between qualitative and quantitative methods in research
Compare and contrast between qualitative and quantitative methods in research
Compare and contrast between qualitative and quantitative methods in research
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
1. Introduction
“Human beings are curious by nature-they want to know more about things or objects to satisfy their curiosity” (Brynard et al, 2014:1). In that regard, methods such as qualitative and quantitative research have been used as a means of gaining information. These methods of research vary both in scope and application. Nonetheless, this essay starts by considering the nature of research as well as the dimensions that guide the choices one makes about research methods. It concludes by placing special attention on the issues of reliability, validity and interobserver agreement in qualitative and quantitative research.
1. The nature of research
Research is not merely a process of collecting information, but research is spiral, meaning that it starts with the statement of a problem, which leads to research question, which ultimately leads to a solution of the problem (Brynard et al, 2014:4). Furthermore, some have understood research as the transferring of facts from one place to another, but the nature of research extend to describing the goal, formulating a theoretical statement, considering the availability of relevant information as well as gathering data (Brynard et al, 2014:4-5). And gathering data involves the collection, organisation and interpretation of data (Brynard et al, 2014:5).
2. Dimensions of research
In order to have a better understanding of the concept of research, four dimensions of research that guides the choices one makes about research methods needs to distinguished.
2.1. Epistemological
The assumption here is that the researcher search for knowledge with the aim of arriving at results that are in close proximity with the truth as possible (Brynard et al, 2014:3).
2.2. Methological
In this dime...
... middle of paper ...
...a because independently verified reports often are more accurate than a single report.
7. Conclusion
Research has been viewed as merely a process of collecting information, or simply a transferring of facts from one place to another, but research involves collection, organisation and interpretation of data. There are several methods used for conducting research, however, for the purpose of this essay only qualitative and quantitative research methods were reviewed. Furthermore, special attention was placed on the fact that in the process of conducting research, both qualitative and quantitative researchers face the issues of reliability and validity. Nonetheless, the response to these issues is that a certain extent of reliability and validity can be reached through establishing a degree of interobserver agreement with regards to accepting the believability of data.
Qualitative research is an approach that attempts to situate an activity that locates the observer in the world by providing the study to occur in their natural setting and by attempting to make sense of, or interpret information (Denzin and Lincoln, 2005). A characteristic of qualitative research is to use a variety of empirical materials such as personal experience, interviews, and questionnaires. It is imperative to understand the task at hand and how to fully carry out the study when using a qualitative research approach in order to find out the information needed. One view of qualitative research is it involves examining individual’s experiences and documenting those experiences in detail (Jones, 2011). By documenting these observations the researcher is ensuring validity in his or her data and giving the correct creditability to those who participated in the study.
Qualitative research methods are divided into five major types of research which are: phenomenology, ethnography, case study research, grounded theory and historical research. Each of these methods are similar as they are each qualitative approaches, however, there are distinct characteristics associated with each type of research.
Research is rendered as a tool to provide people with information and used to coincide with experimentation. “Basic research aims to expand the knowledge by formulating, evaluating, or expanding a theory” (Neutens, 2014), and
Qualitative methods can be traced back to the ancient Greek historians. Herodotus, who is often called the father of history, traveled widely in the ancient world and recounted in his Histories the stories he had heard from the people he met. His successors down the ages recorded their observations of people that they encountered in their travels. These kinds of observations eventually became formalized in the discipline of anthropology. In clinical research, qualitative methods were first used in case histories, for instance, Breuer and Freud’s (1895/1955) first cases, which began the psychoanalytic tradition, and Watson and Rayner’s (1920) study of ‘‘Little Albert,’’ which helped establish the behavioral tradition. There is also a tradition of participant observation methods in mental health research, though they are more often conducted by sociologists than by psychologists. Classic examples of participant observation studies are Goffman’s (1961) Asylums and Rosenhan’s (1973) ‘‘Sane in insane places’’ study (Barker and Pistrang 2002).
Research is defined as systematic investigation in order to establish facts and reach new conclusions (OUP, 2014). The biopsychosocial model has already been described.
The term methods refers to the ways in which researchers collect data to build their argument. All empirical research, regardless of whether it is considered to be qualitative (QUAL), quantitative (QUAN), or both, as in mixed mode research (MMR), include a discussion of research methodology (Schensul, 2008b). Most qualitative research refer to the constituent components of research methodology; guiding paradigms, aspects of research design, definitions of terminology, methods of data collection, and analysis and dissemination. Theory is extremely important in providing the initial arguments for the study, framing its formative conceptual model, and guiding directions in data collection and
topic definitions, gaps in the study and sources are key essentials to conduct a literature review (Hart, 2008). Nature of Study. According to Babbie (2013) using a qualitative methodology is appropriate for a study using a case study in design. A qualitative methodology is one of the three scientific research methodologies that is used to answer questions in a study. A qualitative case study involves the exploration of one or more cases within in a bounded system. Methodology. The methodology is appropriate for this study by providing the advantage of using open-ended questions to probe responses of the participants by allowing participants to respond using their own formulated responses instead of forced solicitation of responses. (See
In public health, it is important to know how to evaluate the appropriate research methods that best addresses an issue and establish rapport with target communities or populations. To gain knowledge of this, a vignette on a community health clinic and the barriers keeping minorities from seeking healthcare services will be assess. This discussion will allow public health scholars to evaluate an appropriate qualitative research method to address questions raised in the given vignette and determine how they would establish rapport with a target community or population in order to effectively apply the appropriated research method.
Bowling describes research as the “systematic and rigorous process of enquiry which aims to describe phenomena and to develop explanatory concepts and theories” (2001, pg.1).
focused on the key qualitative research methods. For each article review, a brief description, guided by Myers (2013), and a critique, guided Pratt (2009), is provided. A summary of the five articles identifying the research method, data collection technique, data analysis approach and critique is provided in Table 1. The narrative review of each article coupled with figures and tables to organize and visualize thoughts (Pratt, 2009) follows the summary table.
In this paper, I will define quantitative and qualitative research methods and provide examples in the context of social issues which will hopefully provide insight into how this methods are properly applied.
The researcher can also gather and utilize information from various sources that he/she feels will help the research
Liamputtong, P. & Ezzy, D., 2005, Qualitative research methods, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press, South Melbourne, Victoria, pp. 12-31.
Qualitative and Quantitative study designs both can be beneficial in research design. They both provide valuable options for researchers in the field. These techniques can either be used separately in a research study or they can be combined to achieve maximum information. This paper will define the terms qualitative and quantitative; describe the similarities and differences between each; discuss how qualitative and/or quantitative research designs or techniques could be used in the evaluation of my proposed research; and discuss why linking analysis to study design is important.
After establishing the research problem and what results are wanted, it will define how it will find the answers. Research is a form of collection and interpretation of information that will form the basis of finding answers to questions. The research uses theories and methods that h...