Pygmalion, by George Bernard Shaw

1119 Words3 Pages

In the today’s society, people are looking for what type of emotion completes them; the emotion is love. Love is the type of emotion that is difficult to explain. When love as an emotion is lost, that person also feels lost, ultimately changes themselves complete. There are several ways in which people change and/or react to such emotions. For example, some react in anger and others react in depression. In 1912, a play written by George Bernard Shaw talked about this same nature of love. Shaw wrote the play, Pygmalion, due to said reaction. However, the reasons why are somewhat ironic.
One of the reasons why Shaw made the play was due to whether he believed in love or not. During the construction of the play, Shaw spoke of love repeatedly as he was a man who was in love when he wrote it. At that time, George Bernard Shaw was having an affair with an actress Patrick Campbell; the love he had for Patrick Campbell was very intimate or so that’s how Shaw thought it was. When it did not work out, He became very angry; Pygmalion was the result of how it did not work. At the end of the play, Shaw kept the readers guessing in controversy whether or not true love does exist.
Shaw made it suspenseful by leaving the audience with a cliff hanger which was then interpreted in a way that he did not agree with. With Shaw’s anger towards these interpretations as well as his love leaving him in despair, he revised the story to have a “sequel” in which he states the ending he truly wanted. Shaw’s interpretation of how the story should have ended left the protagonist in a depressed state. This was assumed because of the grudge he had with Patrick till his death.
I do not believe that Shaw’s interpretation was not fully correct. I also ...

... middle of paper ...

...l Pickering. Grants suits the idea of a man who is eager to learn about different things. These characters where chosen because they would be able to convey the message of love.
As I am building the scenario of the play revisited I try to not hold a basis the play itself. The whole point of reworking the play is that it should be up to the viewer to decide what should occur. The director should allow the audience to decide for themselves which love is greater. The reason why the play will be rewritten into a contemporary model where Eliza is becoming a lawyer instead of a flower girl is to preserve a story with an unexpected ending. The actors chosen to lead particular roles are so that the idea of which love is stronger truly exists. This is what I believe Shaw’s actual point of writing the play was all about. Does love truly exists or is it a hard ending for all?

Open Document