Applying to a Ph.D. program is a dream come true for me. Not knowing anyone in my family getting a college degree motivated me to achieve an academic degree from a university. My experience in my undergraduate years and masters program has been a great journey, but I am hungry for much more. As a criminology and criminal Justice major I feel a great need to get a graduate level education to become a figure in Criminology that can make a positive impact in our society and the world. Looking into your program I believe this would be a great fit for me. My favorite part of your program that caught my eye was the research that has come from faculty and students from the University that I would like to work with. I would like to work with the professors such as (…) who have conducted research I really appreciate. Working with these professors would be something that I can only dream of at this moment. My interest and concern with the criminal justice system started at an early age around the first time I walked into a state prison to visit my father. This was a scary and foreign experience for a child the age of 8 years old. I was able to experience first-hand what the effects on children are with incarcerated …show more content…
Learning of theories and research policy implications is a crucial task our society needs. I am very interested in being the one who conducts such studies. I have also studied international relations and I am very interested in taking my studies abroad to learn cross-culturally aspects of crime and various policies’. Norway’s Justice System fascinates me, I got interested in their justice system after researching about their policies and effectiveness in rehabilitation and doing a half hour presentations on it. These presentations included Bastoy prison and many statistics that related Norway’s Crime and recidivism to
WARD, K., LONGAKER, A. J., WILLIAMS, J., NAYLOR, A., ROSE, C. A. & SIMPSON, C. G. 2013. Incarceration Within American and Nordic Prisons: Comparison of National and International Policies. ENGAGE-The International Journal of Research and Practice in Student Engagement, 1, 36-47.
After examining the websites for the New York State Department of Corrections (NYSDOC), the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ), and Kriminalomsorgen (Norwegian Correctional Services), we are given a comprehensive overview of the many similarities that each organization shares. For instance, despite the “tough on crime” approach, rehabilitation remains an integral component for all three organizations. It is important to note that although Norway places a greater emphasis on rehabilitation, each department shares similar visions, goals, and values. However, each organization also possesses a variety of opposing punishment guidelines and security procedures. An example of one of these well-known differences in sentencing is the fact that Texas still imposes capital punishment. Of course, New York does not support the death penalty, and Norway’s maximum sentence is far more merciful than either Texas or New York. As we continue, we will further examine the mutual aspects that each department has in common, the ...
Criminal profiling, first undertaken within the nineteen-seventies, has been used throughout thousands of police investigations from bureaus all over the globe, currently some question their practicality in police investigations. This essay argues the utility of offender profiling in police investigations. Police Investigations utilize Offender and Criminal Profiling methods because it narrows the field of investigation, needs diminutive physical evidence to begin investigations and uses victimology to predict future actions of the offender.
Throughout history, it has become very clear that the tough on crime model just does not work. As stated by Drago & Galbiati et al. In their article: Prison Conditions and Recidivism, although it is...
For decades, prison has been signified as an unspeakably horrifying place for those who have done harm to our society. Nevertheless, in today 's society, shows like Wentworth, orange is the new black and prison break illustrate prison in an entertaining way. A way that is so detached from reality. However, in the article "Norway 's Ideal Prison," by Piers Hernu, he clearly reveals and gives us a vivid picture of what prison life is like in Bastoy, the home of Norway only prison. On the other hand, "The Prisoners Dilemma," by Stephan Chapman argues how in Islamic countries criminals are being cruelly handled and how flawed the American penal system is and needs to be adjusted. Even though there are many similarities in both articles on what
In Western cultures imprisonment is the universal method of punishing criminals (Chapman 571). According to criminologists locking up criminals may not even be an effective form of punishment. First, the prison sentences do not serve as an example to deter future criminals, which is indicated, in the increased rates of criminal behavior over the years. Secondly, prisons may protect the average citizen from crimes but the violence is then diverted to prison workers and other inmates. Finally, inmates are locked together which impedes their rehabilitation and exposes them too more criminal
This form of justice emphasizes the philosophy that everyone deserves a second chance. The largely successful Norwegian prison system emphasizes the need to not treat criminals cruelly. Oftentimes, those who commit crimes have been bred in environments that have led them to where they are; sometimes they’ve been subject to childhood abuse. In cases like the Jassi Sidhu case, it would seem rehabilitation is a far off concept. The individuals that conspired to murder Jassi Sidhu have been bred to think a certain way their entire lives and changing that would not be an easy task. However if we punish individuals without attempting to help them better themselves, we as a society have reached a dead end, as Judge John Reilly said,” If we only punish wrongdoing with no attempt to fix the underlying causes, we only damage the web of our society.”
Critical criminology, also known as radical criminology dates back to the concepts of Marxism. Despite the fact that Fredric Engels and Karl Marx were the founders of contemporary radical criminology, none of them gave explicit focus to crime. William Bonger (1876-1940), a Dutch criminologist was a more direct founder of this concept. It gained popularity during the early 1970s when it tried to explain the causes of contemporary social mayhem. He used economic explanations were used by critical criminology to analyze social behavior by arguing that social and economic inequalities were the main reason behind criminal behavior (Henry & Lainer, 1998). This view reduces the focus on individual criminals and elaborates that the existing crime is as a result of the capitalist system. Just like the conflict school of thought, it asserts that law is biased since it favors the ruling or the upper class and that the legal system that governs the state is meant to maintain the status quo of the ruling class. Critical criminologist are of the view that political, corporate and environmental crime are not only underreported but also inadequately punished by the existing criminal legal system.
Rather than capital punishment, “Swedish prison systems gradually gained a reputation as a relatively open system with liberal policies for visitors & furloughs,” (von Hofer p. 171), “the breakthrough of imprisonment in Sweden occurred in the first half of the nineteenth century, during the period from 1810-1840 the number of prisoners quadrupled,”(Nilsson, R. (2003). The point Sweden was trying to make in the early days of the prison system was that social control is a necessity for the overall safety of society. The responsibility of Sweden’s prisons relies on the National Prison Board, which has made reforms and adjustments to the daily operations of prisons since they became centralized. Swedish prisons changed dramatically during the nineteenth century and, “the new disciplinary techniques had become formalized in a minutely worked-out system of rules, comprising every part and every phase of the activities inside the prisons. The nineteenth century prison broke the connection between the criminal and society,” (Nilsson, R.
Conscious efforts to critique existing approaches to questions of crime and justice, demystify concepts and issues that are laden with political and ideological baggage, situate debates about crime control within a socio-historical context, and facilitate the imagination and exploration of alternative ways of thinking and acting in relation to crime and justice. (p. 3).
The United States prison system is devoted to justice by hammering out retribution to those who violate the rules of the law. Though this is indeed the just and correct thing to do, crime should be and is followed by punishment, but what then? After serving their time, inmates are returned to the streets knowing only the torment of life. It seems the Scandinavian prison system has tried to change that, and has succeeded with the rehabilitation of inmates by putting rehabilitation over retribution, in order to directly address recidivism. By supporting the philosophy of ‘gentle justice’, the United States may not be able to remove crime entirely but it can definitely cut down on recidivism, and inmates who return to a life of crime. This investigation of the facets of prison life in the United States and Scandinavia is to show how the United States can give social stability by cutting down on crime rates, save money in the long run, and morally and ethically make a difference in the lives of troubled men and...
Classical Criminology is credited with initiating the shift away from rather barbaric forms of torture. In classical criminology, the naturalistic approach of social thinkers had challenged the way of the spiritualistic approach. During this time, the spiritualistic approach was the base for all policies in Europe. This means that every crime had as spiritual meaning for which it was committed. St. Thomas Aquinas, a contributor to the topic, argued that people had a natural tendency to be good rather than evil. He also argued that because they committed a crime it did not just hurt other, it would hurt them.
This essay will examine the early approaches of criminology which aided in its development using the theories of Beccaria (theory of freewill) and Lombroso (biological theory), and will compare the arguments for rehabilitation and for treatment. An answer to what Criminology could be is that it is the scientific/theoretical study of crime and criminals which incorporates into its study both individuals, society and organisations. Criminology came about at the end of the 1700s from society’s need to understand crime in the social world. The purpose of Criminology is to give us an insight into the criminal mind/world. Criminology incorporates other social sciences such as psychology, history
Critical perspectives on discipline, social control, and punishment are studied within the field of critical criminology. It assumed that human beings are both determined and determining creatures (Bohm and Vogel, 2011). In the process, they create institutions that they are capable of changing the structure (Bohm and Vogel, 2011). Critical Criminology assumes that society is based on conflicts between competing interests groups. The root of criminology can be traced back to the mid-seventeenth century. It gives homage to Cesare Beccaria, an Italian jurist and author of On Crimes and Punishments, and Jeremy Bentham a conflict criminologist who wrote Theoretical Criminology. Bentham argued that crime is an outcome of political conflicts between
Social harmony has become a powerful and popular indicator to asset a population’s quality of life. So much so, people’s attitude toward crime rates has shifted from a lukewarm state to a profoundly sensitive level. Accordingly, the public’s increasing fears have translated into more and more restrictive policies to punish crimes. Therefore, crime prevention is considered as a strategic approach to lessen the probability of criminal behaviors in a political community, and to maintain social-control following the heated debates on civilians’ safety.