Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Utilitarianism theory
Privacy in the workplace ethics
The theory of utilitarianism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Utilitarianism theory
Do employees have the right to expect privacy in the workplace? The answer to this question has become a controversial topic when it comes to employers keeping an eye on their employees. In fact, the monitoring of employees has brought forth concerns among a variety of groups. From managers of businesses to employees and privacy advocates, each has its own reasons for or against employee monitoring. Employee monitoring is the act of tracking the actions of employees to ensure they are using equipment properly and being productive while on the clock. Because the use of technology is prevalent in the workplace, employee monitoring has become a common practice to prevent fraud, theft, or dishonesty. While employees feel monitoring is an invasion of privacy, employers have the right to monitor their employees so long as it is legal and ethical. In fact, employers must monitor their employees to guarantee productivity, greater organizational security, and lessen the liability employers face for employee actions.
Companies are monitoring employees to ensure productivity. Organizations are fully aware that employees are engaging in non-job related activities such as Internet surfing while on the job. In fact, of employees that have been surveyed, “60.7% said they visit websites or surf for personal use at work” (Martin & Freeman, 2003). These behaviors can be destructive for the organization. Time spent on company equipment for personal use is time spent away from company business and tend to decrease company revenue. It is the company’s responsibility to take the necessary steps to guarantee employees are working while at work (Pheifer, 2013). It is for this reason that 77.7% of all businesses are conducting some sort of su...
... middle of paper ...
... using company equipment. It is important to realize that businesses must keep their best interest as well as that of their stakeholders in mind. By monitoring their employees, an organization is conducting business under the Profit Maximization and Utilitarian Theories which “suggest that employers take the course of action that produces the greatest good for the greatest number of relevant stakeholders” (Mujtaba, n.d.). Essentially, employee monitoring provides companies with the opportunity to guarantee productivity of employees, plan for an increase in organizational security, and lessen the liability employees create. In order to encourage ethical behavior of all involved and to prevent legal ramifications associated with monitoring of employees, a Code of Ethics and an Acceptable Use Policy must be signed by all employees and kept on file by the company.
For example, when they go to the gym, they like to monitor their heart rate. The emotions that arose in me while I read this article is that bosses should not have the control to monitor their employees and it should be the highest in the company you are, you should be monitored. They have more power in the company so, then they mess up it has more of an effect on the company. I think that the more important you are in the company the more you should be monitored. This changed my perspective on why do we have devices that allow other people to know where we are and how we are feeling when it should be for our benefit and not
The Social Contract Theory would apply in preservation of ethics in the workplace as it considers an action to be good if it is accepted by collective group of rational people and is therefore considered binding (Nielsen, 2013). The Social Contract theory would be used to collectively determine whether GPS tracking of employees is ethical. Employees and employers would be required to collectively agree on the benefits of tracking such as increased productivity, efficiency, cost reduction and better accountability all of which would translate to more profits for the company and bonuses for the employees. The employees would consent to GPS tracking and monitoring during office hours while the employer would be required to forego tracking and monitoring during lunch breaks and outside working hours, otherwise the employer would be in violation of the collective agreement. Employees would also be required to abide by their duties and responsibilities during working hours to avoid violation of the agreement. The Social contract theory would also include consequences in the instance of violation for both the employer and employee
Privacy can be defined as an individual condition characterized by exclusion from publicity. Right to Privacy is the absence of unauthorised interference with a person’s seclusion of himself or his property from the public. Being the essence of dignity , it reflects autonomy over the intimacies of personal identity. The protection of privacy is considered a fundamental human right, indispensable to the protection of liberty and democratic institutions. Privacy could be regarded as a natural right , which provides foundation for the legal right.Thus , this right is protected under various laws and it is constitutionally protected in most
Terms and Laws have gradually change overtime dealing with different situations and economic troubles in the world in general. So then dealing with these issues the workplace has become more complex with little or no rights to privacy. Privacy briefly explained is a person’s right to choose whether or not to withhold information they feel is dear to them. If this something will not hurt the business, or its party members then it should be kept private. All employees always should have rights to privacy in the workplace. Five main points dealing with privacy in public/private structured businesses are background checks, respect of off duty activities/leisure, drug testing, workplace search, and monitoring of workplace activity. Coming to a conclusion on privacy, are there any limits to which employers have limitations to intrusion, dominance on the employee’s behavior, and properties.
The evolution of the Internet started from the department of defense's project, and rapidly distributed to world wide. With the rise of the Internet age comes with the benefits and the concerns. Because of the easeness to communicate information and displaying data, the first amendment needs to be applied to this communication channel. How are we using and communicating information without offending and harm others? Since the evolution of the Internet, there has been acts from Congress to regulate the use the Internet such as the Communications Decency Act in 1996 and the Child Online Protection Act in 1998. These acts aim to forbid Internet users from displaying offensive speech to users or exposing children of indecent materials. The Internet raises other issues that people might have. The biggest and most debatable topic is the privacy issue. Is the Internet a safe place to protect personal information such as financial information, medical data, etc…? Some people who are computer literate or at least with some experience in software and technology would not trust to release the information on the web or at random sites . As a matter of fact, any unknown or small vendor on the web would have difficulty getting many customers to do business online. Big vendors such as Amazon would want to secure their network infrastructure to protect the users information, so that their server would not be hacked. However, even this style of protecting personal information is not enough. The users demand further protection such as ensuring their information is not being sold to other vendors for misuse, or spam the users mailbox with soliticing.
30 Privacy Rights Clearinghouse (2002) Employee Monitoring: Is There Privacy in the Workplace? . (6/3/2004)
Sometimes there is no middle ground. Monitoring of employees at the workplace, either you side with the employees or you believe management owns the network and should call the shots. The purpose of this paper is to tackle whether monitoring an employee is an invasion of privacy. How new technology has made monitoring of employees by employers possible. The unfairness of computerized monitoring software used to watch employees. The employers desire to ensure that the times they are paying for to be spent in their service is indeed being spent that way. Why not to monitor employees, as well as tips on balancing privacy rights of employees at the job.
One type of surveillance is employee monitoring. Many employers monitor their workers’ activities for one reason or another. Companies monitor employees using many methods. They may use access panels that requires employees to identify themselves to control entry to various area in the building, allowing them to create a log of employee movements. They may also use software to monitor attendance and work hours. Additionally, many programs allows companies to monitor activities performed on work computers, inspect employee emails, log keystrokes, etc. An emerging methods of employee monitor also include social network and search engine monitoring. Employers can find out who their employees are associated with, as well as other potentially incriminating information. (Ciocchetti)
During the past decade, the internet has revolutionized and changed the way organizations do business by offering rapid communication systems and enhanced information access and innovation of technological advancements have created a brave new workplace. Further, the internet enables organizations to decrease expenses, reduce product life cycle time, market goods and services more efficiently (Anandarajan et al, 2000). However, with these kinds of benefits, the internet provides employees with a technique
An example of the pros and cons of privacy in the work place while during the hiring process is in 2012, a company in Maryland decided to ask job seekers to log into personal profiles and search through wall posts. As this is becoming more of trend many creative ways to monitor the posts. Another example within this sector is the athletic program at the University of North Carolina, “Each team must identify at least one coach or administrator who is responsible for having access to and regularly monitoring the content of team member social networking sites and postings”
Ivarsson, Lars Larsson, Patrik. "Personal Internet Usage At Work: A Source Of Recovery." Journal Of Workplace Rights 16.1 (2011): 63. Advanced Placement Source. Web. 19 Apr. 2014.
Privacy is the ability to maintain what or who can access and see your personal content and information. With that, the idea of privacy is different amongst different cultures and countries, while they all differ, they share common characteristics. The act of sharing ones own personal information is decision one must make on their own. Privacy is a right that all people should have and the government has the responsibility of maintaining that right. Data such as personal emails, bank details, medical records, and passwords need to remain safe and secure to ensure privacy is not invaded.
Employee rights are very important in the workplace (Rakoczy, C. n.d.). There are some laws to protect employee rights such as safe working environment, discrimination and overtime pay rate to ensure every employee treated fairly. All employees have the right to work in a safe and healthy workplace. In some industries, they use the high-voltage of electricity, extreme temperature, the high-speed and noisy machine in their workplace which can potentially threat to employee health and safety. A safety and healthy workplace must provide reasonable daily and weekly job schedule to the employees. Therefore, when the employee follows the job schedule, they can prevent to work overload because of a systematic system applied by the company.
In job settings, distractions caused by cell phones and internet surfing have a negative impact on overall productivity Employees fail to provide quality customer service and are unable to complete their daily assignments (Laroya). This has a negative impact on the overall economy. This lack of productivity has forced businesses to change the way that they operate. People are being replaced with machines because of their lackadaisical approach to personal interaction and communications (Nilles). The end result of this decreased productivity presents a negative impact on our overall economy.
For every technological introduction or advancement, there are consequences which come with it. This excludes not those that come with introduction of management information systems in companies. The modern society is entirely depended on information systems. Failure of these systems, today, can be declared as end of humanity. Worse enough is that there is a generational shift whereby future generations will not live without information systems that manage information. However, latest evaluations of the impact of management information systems have proven that there are chances, which are very high, of ethics being abused at the work place. Both the employees and the employers, are guarded by certain cord of ethics which aim at regulating the dignity of everybody at working place; and how far one party can be influential on the other especially on matters pertaining privacy. Profit making goals should not, by any means, overlook the importance of working ethics. This paper endeavors to explore areas of major concern where working ethics are likely to be compromised or have already been compromised at the working place due to institution of management information systems. Nevertheless, this research does not underscore the importance of these systems at the working place. The aim is to expose the negative impacts that might result from misuse of management information systems. These impacts can emanate from either party that forms part of the organization. In this case, mostly, it is either from the employee or the employer.