Mental Toughness Essay

1233 Words3 Pages

Jones (2002)
Jones, Hanton, & Connaughton (2002), were the first researchers to conceptualized mental toughness. They interviewed 10 international performers to gain their perspectives regarding the topic. Based on the results they defined mental toughness as:
Having the natural or developed psychological edge that enables you to (a) generally, cope better than your opponent with the many demands (competition, training, lifestyle) that sport places on a performer, and (b) specifically, be more consistent and better than your opponents in remaining determined, focused, confident, and in control under pressure. (p. 209)
This study also delineated 12 key attributes of mental toughness; (1) unshakable self-belief in ability to achieve competition …show more content…

(2004), were among the first to challenge Jones et al’s 2002 definition on grounds that the definition didn’t succintly define the construct, but rather it explaned what a mentally tough individual is capcable of. In contrast to Jones et al., they defined mental toughness as “an unshakeable perserverance and conviction toward a commmon goal despite pressure or adversity” (p. 6). The researchers argue that their definition is a better representation of mental toughness because it encompasses a larger sample (33 participants), comprised of a greater variety of sports. Furthermore, all the athletes within the sample had a gold medal or world championship, in their respective sport. Middleton et al’s work goes on to divide the construct into a specific orioentation and strategies of mental toughness. Mental toughness orientation is subdivided into four categories: (a) self-belief, (b) task familiarity, (c) motivation, and (d) goal commitment. Middleton et al. listed three separate characteristics under mental toughness strategy: (a) perserverence, (b) task-specific attention, and (c) emotion …show more content…

(p. 69).
In contrast to the definitions provided by Jones et al. (2002), and Clough et al. (2002), this definition is general in nature and identifies the significant role of values, attitudes, cognitions, and emotions, without confining the variables with subjective definitions (i.e., they acknowledge the importance of the variables but restrained from pontificating their exact role without sufficient evidence). It can be said that Gucciardi’s definition encompasses a more task-based approach, not ego-based definition, because it describes how an individual progresses towards his/her goals by examining both the outcomes and processes of mental toughness. In contrast, the definitions provided by Jones et al., Middleton et al., and Clough et al., rely on social comparison and achieving superiority over the

Open Document