Psychic Phenomenon Research

933 Words2 Pages

ESP is an acronym meaning "extra-sensory perception." In 1892, a French dude named Dr. Paul Joire used the term to describe the way a person under hypnosis was able to receive information about something - apparently without using any of their known senses. ESP can also refer to the phenomenon of people communicating without any apparent vehicle.

But what IS it?

There have been a great number of attempts (made by an even greater number of stupid people) to articulate what exactly is happening when people report ESP events. Here are a few of those attempts :

*

Invisible brainwaves - Thought processes in one person's mind propagate outward and affect another's brain function, resulting in the transfer of information.

*

Universal conscience - There is a field of consciousness that everyone is tied in to. Information can be transferred using this field.

*

Pee Wee Herman - A skinny annoying white man manipulates space-time in order to exchange information between people while chanting "Connect the dots, la la la la."

Experiments to Test for the Existence of ESP

In 1882, the Society for Psychical Research was founded in London, and apparently was the first institution to specifically study events that had been called "psychic" or whatever. Many noted people from Cambridge started this society. Their wives left them shortly afterward. Today, there are many of these sorts of institutions, including numerous ones in the U.S.

Here are a few experiments that have been purported (by their practitioners) to prove the existence of psychic phenomenon:

The Rhine Experiment: First conducted at Duke University in 1930, the Rhine experiment (named after Dr. J.B. Rhine) involves a subje...

... middle of paper ...

...your checkbook to send in the $19.99 (plus shipping and handling ofcourse), ask yourself the following questions:

1. Who is this dude?

Where is he from? Who funds his lab? What are his credentials? Has he ever been arrested?

2. What does he BELIEVE?

Scientists are just people, and may not be completely objective. In the business of parapsychology, objectivity is a liability.

3. How did he prove what he is saying he proved?

Experimental controls? Double-blind? Was he high when he did the statistical analysis?

4. What do other scientists think about the experiment?

Criticisms of the study? Where results reproducable by independant laboratories?

5. Is reading this book supposed to make me rich, reverse the aging process, or increase the size of my genitals?

If the answer is "yes," clearly the claim is fraudulent.

Open Document