Prosecutorial Discretion and Law Execution

1305 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: discretionary powers in the united states criminal justice system

Prosecutorial Discretion
Whitebread and Slogobin state that the job of executing the law at the federal and state levels rests with the prosecution. This means that the prosecutor makes the decisions about the charges. Prosecutorial discretion means that the prosecutor decides whether someone should be charged for a crime and what that individual should be charged with (Whitebread & Slogobin, 2000). The Bordenkircher v. Hayes (1978) case established some guidelines for using prosecutorial discretion. This case basically states as long as the prosecutor has probable cause to charge someone and what to file against them is at his discretion. Amongst the responsibilities of the prosecutor is the ability to decide how to bring the charges, such as, joinder of charges or joinder of parties. I will be discussing the choices that prosecutors must make when prosecuting a crime (Whitebread & Slogobin, 2000).
Sometimes the prosecutor will make the decision to forego prosecution. This could be done through a plea bargain or through dismissal of the charges. Plea bargains are agreements between the defendant and the prosecution, where the defendant agrees to plead guilty in exchange for a lesser sentence. There are some that feel that plea bargains don’t serve the interest of the Criminal Justice System because it is overburdening it (Whitebread & Slogobin, 2000).
A dismissal usually occurs when the prosecution does not have sufficient evidence to obtain a conviction; 75% of all cases result in dismissal by the prosecution. Many times there is enough evidence to place an individual on trial, but it would be a waste of time and resources to try a case you can’t win. Dismissing charges has its limitations and restrictions, so tha...

... middle of paper ...

...nce is sought because there is rarely a benefit for the defendant in this situation. However, joinder of defendants can be highly prejudicial due to reasons such as: a confession by one defendant can show guilt for both defendants, a testimony by a defendant that clears the codefendant may not be introduced into evidence, both defendants are convicted out of confusion of charges or evidence, or one defendant is convicted because of association with the codefendant (Whitebread & Slogobin, 2000).

Works Cited
Bordenkircher v. Hayes, 434 US 357 (1978)
Town of Newton v. Rumery, 480 US 386 (1987)
Oyler v. Boles, 368 US 448 (1962)
Wayte v. United States, 470 US 598
Falls v. Town of Dyer, Indiana, 875 F.2d 146 (7th Cir.1989)
United States v. Robinson, 311 F.Supp. 1063 (W.D.Mo.1969)
Whitebread, C. H. & Slobogin, C. (2000). Criminal procedure. New York: Foundation Press.

Show More
Related

  • R V. Rogerson And Mcnamara Case Analysis

    611 Words  | 2 Pages

    The conviction of guilty offenders when adhering to the guidelines of the NSW criminal trial process is not difficult based on the presumption of innocence. However, due to features of the criminal trial process, established by the adversarial system of trial, cases can often involve copious amounts of time and money, particularly evident in the case of R vs Rogerson and McNamara where factors such as time and money are demonstrated to be in excess. In addition, characteristics of the adversarial system such as plea bargaining has the power to hinder convictions due to the accused having the authority to hire experienced and expensive lawyers to argue their case, hence maintaining their innocence.

    Read More

  • The Casey Anthony Trial: The Trial Of O. J. Simpson

    1077 Words  | 3 Pages

    Jurors will thoroughly inspect and weigh over the evidence provided, and process any and all possible scenarios through the elements of crime. If the evidence does not support the prosecutor 's argument and the elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt, the jury must pronounce the defendant not guilty. If questionable or irrelevant evidence is included in the criminal proceeding, it is the duty of the prosecutor or defendant 's counsel to object and insist that the evidence be excluded by the presiding

    Read More

  • Contradictions In The Job Of The Prosecutor Case Study

    986 Words  | 2 Pages

    Therefore, under these ethical standards, prosecutors cannot file charges if there is not enough evidence to support a conviction, they also do not file if it is not in the public interest to do so. This is what makes the possibilities limitless; however, three key factors also play a part in determining which cases to prosecute. If prosecutors follow these three factors in determining cases then the contradiction of limitless discretion and high ethical standards should be remedied for others. These are factors that should be followed are as followed: the seriousness and nature of the offense, the offender’s culpability, and the likelihood of being able to obtain a conviction at a trial. “Ethical conduct, then, must be the core of the prosecutor’s role in the criminal justice system” (Hemmens, Brody, & Spohn, 2013). Therefore, even though prosecutors have almost limitless discretion in their decisions, they still must

    Read More

  • Dual Court System Q&A

    1218 Words  | 3 Pages

    pleas may be choose for the punishment likely to be associated with them rather than for their accuracy in describing the criminal offense in which the defendant was involved. For instance, a charge of indecent liberties, for example, in which the defendant is accused of sexual

    Read More

  • Pros and Cons of Plea Bargaining

    2400 Words  | 5 Pages

    An agreement made in a criminal case between a prosecutor and its defendant, before reaching a trial is a plea bargain. The prosecutor offers an opportunity to the defendant to plead guilty. By agreeing to plead guilty to a crime the defendant would in exchange get a prosecutor’s promise to convince the judge to reduce the sentence. It is really impossible to predict what a jury is going to decide in a trial. I personally think that plea bargaining is being used as an easy way out; instead of having the person who committed the crime pay for what they did by serving the whole time. By managing a plea bargain the terms can sometimes be used to include pondering on how it works and who it can help.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Aneta Luboch A Mental Patient's Handbook

    1416 Words  | 3 Pages

    With the only evidence the police had being a shaky account of what happened that night, a story filled with holes from a woman who still seemed to be suffering from trauma of it all, they had no choice but to drop the charges. They knew the likelihood of him being found guilty in a court law was even less that the likelihood of the existence of demons.

    Read More

  • Interpreting the Constitution: Plea Bargain Controversies

    790 Words  | 2 Pages

    During this process both parties have to compromise; the prosecutors will lower the charges and will suggest a minimum sentence to the judge if the defendant pleas guilty to the lesser charge. On the The Criminal Justice System: Part III Courts, there is a difference between the publics perspective and the reality. The publics view on the criminal justice system is a picture that is been painted by the media as a fight between police and robbers, and the court is the bottle feel. Many have the misconception that prosecutors and defense attorneys are enemies and that dislike each other. The reality is that both prosecutor and the defense attorney work together everyday to solve cases. Plea deals is an example of the collaboration between both parties to arrive to a happy median. As stated on the book is estimated that over 90% of cases end up in a plea deal. This mass production of plea deals helps the court system to stay clear, the prosecutor to close more cases and the defense attorney to work faster, but what happens with the person who’s life is being agreed on? Every so often people plea guilty to crimes they did not commit, because they are convinced is the fastest, easiest and more inexpensive way to get out. In other cases, offenders just agreed on the deal because it offered them a lesser sentence. Either way, plea

    Read More

  • Examples Of Prosecutorial Misconduct

    708 Words  | 2 Pages

    Prosecutorial misconduct is when a prosecutor wrongfully convicts a defendant based on information he or she may keep concealed from a judge and/or jury. Ask the average citizen, and they are totally unaware that such a thing ever happens. The public is often persuaded to believe that all prosecutors are honorable people who are committed to ethics, justice, and upholding the law. But prosecutorial misconduct and misdeeds happen, and they occur more frequently than anyone would imagine. Judge Konzinski, stated to the Washington Post, “Prosecutorial misconduct is a particularly difficult problem to deal with because so much of what prosecutors do is secret. If a prosecutor fails to disclose exculpatory evidence to the defense, who is to know? Or if a prosecutor delays disclosure of evidence helpful to the defense until the defendant has accepted an unfavorable plea bargain, no one will be the wiser.” No wonder society is naive to the prosecutorial misconduct that transpire

    Read More

  • Prosecutorial Misconduct Essay

    714 Words  | 2 Pages

    When it comes to the vague ethics rules and finding effective ways to create a set of clearer ethical standards, legalistic approaches should be taken. Legalistic approaches began in the early 1900’s with the first set of ethics rules, the 1908 Canons. The 1908 Canons stated the primary duty of a prosecutor is to seek justice. The 1908 Canons method failed due to the lack of clarity concerning in depth what the prosecutor’s ethical obligations were. Another remarkable approach was the 1969 Model Rules, which made operational progress in defining the ethical duties of a prosecutor which established a set of rules, but yet and still failed to address the ethical obligation of seeking justice (American Bar Association, 1983). If these legalistic approaches continue to advance and make suitable amount of progress, less failure will occur and eventually the goal of seeking justice will be reached. An effective method to alleviate the vast discretionary authority with little to no transparency would be to use a prosecutor’s handbook (Joy 2006). Both the American Bar Association Prosecution Function Standards and National District Attorneys Association make recommendation of using a prosecutor’s handbook. These written standards bring more awareness to prosecutors allowing them to know the limits of their authority and provides guidance on how to properly exercise discretion. At the last point, inadequate remedies which create incentive to prosecutorial misconduct rather than deter it can be solved by reformation (Caldwell, 2013). Within trial courts, when a prosecutor has fraudulently obtained evidence, the trial court does have to option to exclude the evidence in which has been affected by misconduct. This approach typically does not result in anything further than a verbal reprimand. There are no types of

    Read More

  • Juvenile Intake Process

    1161 Words  | 3 Pages

    The attorney’s office of the prosecutor is usually the one’s who decide whether charges should

    Read More

  • Should Plea Bargaining be Abolished?

    2271 Words  | 5 Pages

    A plea bargain can be defined as, “a negotiation between the defendant and his attorney on one side and the prosecutor on the other, in which the defendant agrees to plead “guilty” or “no contest” to some crimes, in return for reduction of the severity of the charges, dismissal of some of the charges, the prosecutor’s willingness to recommend a particular sentence or some other benefit to the defendant. Sometimes one element of the bargain is that the defendant reveal information such as location of stolen goods, names of others participating in the crime or admission of other crimes. The judge must agree to the result of the plea bargain before accepting the plea. If he does not, then the bargain is cancelled.”

    Read More

  • Role Of Discretion In The Criminal Justice System

    1729 Words  | 4 Pages

    This day in age discretion is an enormous deal in the scope of criminal justice, whether more discretion is being granted, or more is being taken away from the system as a whole, it is a massive topic to be discussed. Discretion is defined as the power or right to decide or act according to one’s own judgement in a given situation (“Discretion” n.d). Today I am going to tell you about discretion in three different ways, firstly I will explain the use of discretion in policing, then I will explain how discretion is used or not used in courts and sentencing, and finally I will tell you why I feel discretion is an necessary part of our criminal justice system here in the United States of America.

    Read More

  • The Issue of Pretrial Publicity

    1935 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...T. M. (1997). Can the jury disregard that information? The use of suspicion to reduce the prejudicial effects of retrial publicity and inadmissible testimony. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(11), 1215-1226.

    Read More

  • Robert Taliento Case Study

    711 Words  | 2 Pages

    Holhan, 294 U.S. 103 (1935). In Napue, the court had held that the same result occurs when the State although not soliciting false evidence allows it to go uncorrected when it appears. In Brady, the Supreme Court had held that irrespective of the good faith or bad faith of the prosecution, suppression of material exculpatory evidence required a new trial.

    Read More

  • The Criminal Justice Process

    1302 Words  | 3 Pages

    Both the federal government and states have authority to prosecute for criminal behavior in the United States. Each has their own criminal statutes, court systems, prosecutors, and police agencies to help deter crime. These criminal statutes control how suspects are investigated charged and tried. The court system institutes rules and policies that consist of their own structures and procedures within each state. Prosecutors are the most powerful and influential representatives of the court system. Sometimes a case can begin in a lower court then work its way up to a higher court depending on the crime. The law enforcers are made up of small town police officials and go all the way up to large federal agencies.

    Read More

More about Prosecutorial Discretion and Law Execution

Open Document