Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
compared window XP and Linux
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: compared window XP and Linux
The Pros and Cons of Linux versus Windows XP
This may be the perfect time to move over to Linux. Windows XP was officially retired as of April 8, 2014. Although we can continue using Windows XP, the two most important factors to consider are 1) there will no longer be security patches released by Microsoft; and 2) they are no longer supporting this product.
Additionally, if our XP machines are more than six years old, which we suspect they are, chances are they won 't support the newer Windows releases, especially 8.1, because it needs significantly more power and storage. Also, some XP applications may not work on newer versions of Windows.
That said, both Windows XP and Linux each have their own specific strengths and weaknesses. To help
…show more content…
• Portable: It can run alone or it can coexist with other operating systems, like Windows. It runs on computers from PCs to mainframes.
Cons
1. Complexity: Although some distributions, or distros, are fairly easy to use, most of them will require a great deal of technical knowledge to get them to work properly.
2. Compatibility: Linux does not have as many programs and games as Windows XP.
3. Support: Technical support is limited since there aren’t many retailers selling Linux computers. You’ll most likely need to purchase Windows computers, reformat the hard drives, and install Linux in-house.
Acquiring Linux Computers
Installing Linux is pretty easy, but if you 'd rather buy a good computer with Linux already installed, you would need to go through smaller independent Linux vendors, that generally build good machines with quality components. The typical low-budget Windows PC is specced to the micro-penny, and built with the cheapest possible components.
Which Linux Distribution?
Another Linux advantage is that there are a number of free and commercial distributions, or distros for short, versions of Linux. They all offer something
I was very interested in computers and technology as a child, both playing games and building fake parts for them. Still in elementary school, I was fascinated by these computing machines, spending hours on end working with DOS to satisfy my curiosity. Around my middle school years, Windows became graphical, and I found interest in even more computer games with even greater experiences and capabilities. Windows was the dominant operating system at the time, but I was soon to find there was a whole different world out there of operating systems. While out on vacation in Washington, DC, my Dad and I were able to meet with the local Tech Fanatics group, HackDC. It was here where I discovered Linux. Linux, an alternative to Windows, immediately grabbed my attention when I saw it in use. It appeared to me as something that only the extreme computer users even heard of. Upon my return home,
There has mostly been much debate over which is the better and most reliable computer to use. There are people who are die-hard Macintosh users, and there are people who are die-hard Window users as well, and naturally people sitting somewhere in between. The fact remains that the most home and business users own Windows-based systems because they are 50% less cheaper than a Macintosh. Windows- based computers are more practical, better software, and versatility for most people than Macintosh computers.
Such an issue may be surmountable through training and education programmes within an organization but these would add further costs to the implementation of Linux in a wholesale manner. There may also be the consideration that an existing solution, such as Windows/Office for example, may be relatively expensive but it is a known quantity in all aspects.
...nning pirated versions of Windows, whose owners tried to circumvent the (legal purchasing) system and reduce their costs. Other individuals and in emerging nations have purchased PCs with Windows “Starter” editions in which the cost of software is lower. The items mentioned here are ways Microsoft is trying to deal with the threat of Linux.
Windows based computers are more practical for many reasons. Possibly the most prevalent of these being that everybody uses them. When using computers consistency is very important. If everyone is using a certain operating system and software, it is easier to transfer, share, and use the data you create. Windows based systems are the standard in our community, and that is not due to change any time soon.
The GNU/Linux operating system will likely continue to grow in popularity throughout the decade initially with hackers and then with consumers.
When Windows XP came out in October 21, many people happily to get the newest operating system. The pro about the operating system; finally it has improved theme by it look and graphic because of the desktop navigation (looks different from it earlier operating system, Windows 200), it will detect any hardware as it will automatically search to find the driver from the internet (such as printer, flash drives, etc.) so the hardware will be able to use. The networks in Windows XP were easier because of the installation wizard to complete the use for the networking. There are some other things that I’d like to work in Windows XP, but sometimes the updates changes things and improve things in Windows XP, including updates for getting rid of viruses. The cons of Windows XP was also become more vulnerable and getting hit mostly by viruses and malware attacks (due getting updates, sometimes the update was annoying because they were forced to be downloaded and install, including have the computer to restart to finish the process). There was a few thing that was taking out of Windows XP when it was upgraded from 2000 too, such as having background changes disabled in documents (I miss those, they were cool). The infamous “Send” and “Don’t send” error report was popping up too often. Some software do have incompatibility when they was built to use for older operating system, sometimes you might have to look for the update when the automatic update can’t find them.
Linux is "open source'' software meaning, simply, that anyone can get copies of its source code files.
by far the messiest OS to ever hit the market this decade. When compared to
running an old operating system that is unable to meet the demands of our current
Recent data shows that 78% of computer users use Microsoft Windows as their primary operating system. Microsoft has also just released a new operating system known as Vista that competes primarily with Apple’s Mac OSX.
The reason for this rapid adoption is Linux’s unique ability to provide powerful functionality, security, compatibility, customization at a more cost-effective price than proprietary vendors. In its inception, there were many perceived concerns to utilizing Linux in a corporate infrastructure.
Ans: ubuntu ,fedora,linux mint, puppy linux, tinycore, MEPIS LINUX, ZORIN OS Ubuntu is the most popular linux distribution, Fedora is the fourth most popular. Fedora is based on Red Hat Linux while Ubuntu is based on Debian.
This system was meant to be free from the first time it was made and published. It happened to be that the Intel x86-based pc’s were the engaging shell for its market. Time passed and the Linux continued to develop on many new levels and what could we see now is a mere reflection of its previous success. On the basis, it has been used on more hardware platforms than other commercial systems which makes it number one server type OS. What is also connected with the fact that it is being widely used is the information of its productivity and reliability when it comes to supporting mainframe and supercomputers.
Fedora and Windows differ in the difficulty of performing task such as installing new software. When installing new software on Fedora, you have to go online and find a source for the program you want.